Sarcastic Cat 🐈

[Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal]

A burglar broke into a store in Pomona, California, thinking he was about to score big, instead he sprinted straight into Wile E. Coyote’s panic hallway of doom.

The owner, tired of break-ins, built a fake “exit” that traps thieves ...genius.

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

Worth studying

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

3 nations are collapsing the exact same way. What has happened to Canada, the UK & Australia is no coincidence.

[Visegrád 24 @visegrad24]

BREAKING:

The European Commission admits it has used EU funds that were supposed to "fight climate change" for financing left-wing NGOs and climate organizations with the aim of silencing the voices of European conservatives in a secretive influence operation.

The funds came from the LIFE Program, which is supposed to fund environmental initiatives and has had a total budget of EUR 9 billion since 2014.

The LIFE program is a funding instrument dedicated to environmental, nature conservation, and climate action projects but some of the funds were instead used to attack conservative and eurosceptic voices according to the Austrian newspaper eXXpress.

The European Commission has issued a short statement on the matter:

"The Commission finds that the work programmes presented by the activist organizations (...) contained inappropriate lobbying activities"

According to internal documents, the targeted campaigns were designed in cooperation between EU agencies and climate NGOs, including planning which critics would be targeted.

- "We see this as a clear misstep by both individual EU officials and organizations," Peter Liese (CDU/Germany), environment policy spokesperson for the conservative EPP group, told eXXpress and added "the misuse of EU funds must stop"

According to the European Commission, changes are now to be introduced to the LIFE program to prevent future excesses.

Guidelines banning subsidized lobbying by EU institutions were already introduced in autumn 2024 - but it is only now that the abuses are being publicly confirmed.

Only a third of organizations and NGOs that received money from the LIFE Program openly disclose their income and how the funds are used, which has led to criticism of lack of transparency.

The former EU Climate Commissioner Frans Timmermans orchestrated the secret contracts with environmental NGOs.

These contracts reportedly included detailed lobbying plans specifying targets and goals. It means that the European Commission provided not just funding but also strategic direction on whom to oppose in a coordinated effort to attack political opponents of the European Commission's climate agenda.

NGOs were instructed to focus on critics of the Green Deal, such as conservative MEPs, national politicians, or parties (Austria’s FPÖ and ÖVP parties are likely among the targets) who resisted stringent climate regulations.

For example, the European Environmental Bureau (EEB), a major NGO network, is accused of being tasked with influencing EU Parliament decisions by targeting lawmakers who opposed ambitious environmental laws, like the Renaturierungsgesetz (Nature Restoration Law).

Practically all the opponents targeted are conservatives skeptical of centralized EU policies, often from populist or nationalist factions of the European Parliament as well as national parliaments.

LIFE Program funds in the order of EUR 15.5 million were sent annually to NGOs—as a tool to enforce this coordination.

It seems that the European Commissions's funding of many of these NGOs came with strings attached: NGOs had to align their campaigns with the Commission’s political goals, including neutralizing opposition by running “shadow lobbying” operations, crafting campaigns to sway public opinion and pressure decision-makers against Green Deal critics.

This included pushing narratives that framed opponents as anti-environment or anti-progress, effectively sidelining their influence.

The EEB, for instance, reportedly had to provide “at least 16 examples” of how their lobbying made EU laws tougher, implying a deliberate effort to counter resistance from conservative lawmakers.

The NGOs leveraged media partnerships and public advocacy to amplify their attacks. By framing critics as obstacles to climate action, they aimed to discredit them politically.

The work was outsourced by the European Commission and major NGOs like the EEB that were responsible for setting priorities, which smaller groups then executed.

Three of the EU's largest conservative party groups, the EPP, ECR, and PfE have called for a pushback against the Commission’s funding practices.

In early 2025, EPP MEPs, alongside ECR and PfE MEPs, threatened to freeze €15.6 million in annual LIFE funding to around 30 environmental NGOs.

The MEPs demanded accountability and alleged that the Commission’s Directorate-General for Environment (DG ENV) secretly paid NGOs to lobby for stricter climate policies and thus undermined the legislative independence of the European Parliament and national parliaments.

EPP figures like Monika Hohlmeier, vice-chair of the Parliament’s budgetary committee, criticized the Commission for what she called “scandalous one-sided methods,” insisting on repayment of misused funds dating back a decade

The EPP MEP @TomasZdechovsky has said there is whistleblower evidence of “secret contracts” directing NGOs to lobby MEPs.

A few weeks ago, the EPP softened its stance slightly with a last-minute shift: they would drop the funding freeze if the Commission provided a transparency statement.

However, after a narrow defeat in the environment committee (41-40 vote on March 31, 2025), the Dutch EPP MEP @sandersmitwzn accused the Commission of reneging on a deal to admit abuses, showing lingering frustration in the EPP.

The ECR, a Eurosceptic and right-wing group, has aligned with the EPP in this controversy, amplifying the narrative of overreach by Brussels:

Several ECR MEPs, including @FiocchiPietro of Giorgia Meloni's Fratelli d’Italia party , co-tabled the objection to LIFE funding with the EPP, arguing that the Commission allowed “targeted lobbying” that disrupted institutional balance.

The ECR's broader agenda of halting EU federalism is closely connected to what it perceives as constant overreach by the European Commission.

EPP, ECR and PfE frame the NGOs’ efforts as targeting “critics of the Green Deal,” which implicitly includes their own members—conservatives and populists who resist aggressive climate policies. Parties like Austria’s ÖVP (EPP) and FPÖ (PfE), Italy’s Fratelli d’Italia (ECR), and Poland’s Law and Justice (ECR) are likely inferred targets, given their vocal skepticism of EU environmental mandates.

Many of the NGOs were focused on issues concerning farming, migration, and climate regulations, making it likely that figures such as the Dutch BBB MEP Sander Smit (EPP), who represents farmer interests, or ECR’s Fiocchi, tied to Italy’s rural and industrial base, were either direct or indirect targets of the NGOs.

Following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, increased Russian aggression against the EU itself (such as sabotage of undersea infrastructure) and the foreign policy changes in the U.S. under President Trump, the debate on the EU abandoning the Green Deal has reignited.

As the Trump administration has stated that all NATO allies should be required to increase military spending to 5% of GDP, many European politicians now realize the Green Deal isn't just making European economies uncompetitive, but also erodes European capabilities to rearm their militaries to the degree needed for Europe to be able to protect EU member states such as Finland, Sweden, the Baltic States and Poland from potential Russian invasions without massive American military support.

The debate in Europe on withdrawing from the Green Deal is just getting started.

[Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra]

Donald Trump has officially invalidated Joe Biden’s pardons, claiming they were signed with an autopen and are therefore null and void.

As a result, Hunter Biden, the entire Biden family, Dr. Anthony Fauci, General Mark Milley, and the January 6th Committee members could now face immediate arrest.

[Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱 @ryangerritsen]

Economist Jeffery Sachs will give you one of the best 6 minute history lessons you will learn today.
“You don’t get to put your military bases anywhere you want and expect peace in this world”

[Alex Jones @RealAlexJones]

The Headline Speaks For Its Self!

[Luther ‘Ćyrus’ @Censored4sure]

Anthony Fauci called RFK Jr. a liar for stating that not one of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested*.

In response, RFK Jr. took legal action, and after a year of delays, Fauci's lawyers conceded that RFK Jr. had been correct.

"There's no downstream liability, there's no front-end safety testing... and there's no marketing and advertising costs, because the federal government is ordering 78 million school kids to take that vaccine every year."

"What better product could you have? And so there was a gold rush to add all these new vaccines to the schedule... because if you get onto that schedule, it's a billion dollars a year for your company."

"So we got all of these new vaccines, 72 shots, 16 vaccines... And that year, 1989, we saw an explosion in chronic disease in American children... ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays, ASD, autism, Tourette's syndrome, ticks, narcolepsy."

"Autism went from one in 10,000 in my generation... to one in every 34 kids today."

*in pre-licensing, placebo-controlled trials @wideawake_media @RobertKennedyJr

Yea let’s talk about it!

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

Bill Gates is in huge trouble.

“The vaccines were NOT developed by Moderna-Pfizer…but by NIH. The patents are owned by NIH. They were made by military contractors. Pfizer and Moderna were paid as if they came from Pharma. They were a Military Project…” https://t.co/LpYLdKSrKI

[The Vigilant Fox 🦊 @VigilantFox]

WATCH: This anti-cancer mushroom supercharges your body’s oxygen levels so much so that Chinese marathon runners shattered world records using it.

Cancer thrives in low-oxygen environments, so imagine the impact when you flood your body with oxygen like this.

The mushroom is Cordyceps.

Investigative journalist @JeffereyJaxen explains that studies have shown that Cordyceps:

• ups your body’s internal oxygen by 40%

• increases ATP by 28%

• increases cancer patients’ natural killer cell activity by 400%

If you haven't heard of Cordyceps, it's probably because it's too cheap for the cancer industry to profit from.

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Speaking in 2007, the late Aaron Russo—a former friend of Nick Rockefeller—recounts being told how women's liberation was funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, in order to get women in the workplace, break up the family unit, and indoctrinate children from an early age.

"We couldn't tax half the population before women's lib... Now we get the kids in school at an early age. We can indoctrinate the kids how to think, which breaks up their family. The kids start looking at the state as the family, as the school, as the officials, as their family."

From 'Reflections & Warnings: Aaron Russo's Final Interview', an interview by Alex Jones.

[The Pleb 🇨🇦 @truckdriverpleb]

Another MASSIVE brawl between Indians took place in Brampton on Friday

They are fighting each other in Canadian parking lots over conflicts in a country that's 11,610km away from Toronto 🤦🏻‍♂️

[Illuminati Coin @naticoineth]

This man was on that plane!

He discovered a way to program regulatory T-cells to attack tumors. A huge breakthrough.

- It showed 90% remission in the lab.
- They’re moving to animal trials.
- If it works, it basically ends cancer.

And his plane just exploded.

Dr. Leo Ferreira

[red pill rick @igetredpilled]

This one is tough to watch.

Within 1 year she bought a house, mortgage payments spiked, she lost her job, tried to sell but there were no buyers, then the bank foreclosed and took the keys.

She’s now being sued for the outstanding mortgage with no legal counsel.

The bank didn’t think twice before taking the keys and suing her.

Her company didn’t help her out with monthly payments.

The government didn’t come to her rescue and bail her out.

Remember, the only one looking out for you is you.

This is real life and everyone needs to understand the risks we’re facing today.

Stay vigilant 🙏

[Alex Jones @RealAlexJones]

Exclusive! Epic New Bohemian Grove Ritual Footage Leaked.

[PeterSweden @PeterSweden7]

HUGE NEWS

A court in Ontario, Canada has ruled that covid PCR nasal swabs were an ”unlawful requirement”.

This is a big development.

The court case revolves around a traveler that was returning home, but after arriving at Pearson International Airport on the 9th April 2022, she rejected a covid nasal swab test.

She was then consequently convicted of failing to comply with the Quarantine Act, and got a fine that together with additional charges landed at a whopping $6,255

The Judge ruled that this was not allowed, stating that ”the screening test cannot involve the insertion into the traveler’s body of any instrument or foreign body”.

Further, the Judge said the following:

”I do decide that the nasal swab test...was an unlawful requirement or demand..refusal to comply with the requirement or demand was lawful on her part. Because the requirement or demand made of her by the screening officer was not lawful”

So there we have it.

A court in Canada has ruled that it was ILLEGAL to force people to be nasal swabbed.

When you think about it, how on earth was it considered acceptable for people to be forced to get a foreign object poked up their nose to begin with? My body, my choice!

I did get some nasal swabs when I had to travel during covid, and let me tell you, it was not a pleasant experience at all.

The good news is that it is new recognized as being unlawful, which will be a good precedent going forward.

Finally, some common sense is prevailing!

[Wide Awake Media @wideawake_media]

Dr. Pierre Kory issues an urgent warning to anybody who took the mRNA-based Covid "vaccines":

"Do not get vaccinated, ever again, with an mRNA vaccine. Do not let family members get vaccinated... The farther you are out from your last one, I think your prognosis is much, much better."

Credit: @SteveDeaceShow @PierreKory

[Rebel News @RebelNewsOnline]

KFC restaurants in Ontario secretly go all-halal

Does the “K” in KFC stand for “Kentucky” – or “Kabul”?

Many Ontarians and visitors to the province must be asking themselves this query given that all Kentucky Fried Chicken restaurants in Ontario – except, oddly, for those situated in Ottawa and Thunder Bay – are now exclusively using halal chicken.

An internal memo written in May recently surfaced noting that this initiative is being undertaken as a “testament to our commitment to provide diverse and inclusive menu options.”

Many beg to differ: how is halal-only chicken and the removal of bacon from the menu “inclusive” if one is not a Muslim patron?

Indeed, members of other faith groups ranging from Catholics and Hindus to Sikhs say they are forbidden to consume halal-slaughtered meat. So, where exactly is the “inclusivity”? And whatever happened to providing choice on the menu? In other words, why not offer halal as well as non-halal chicken and let the consumer decide what’s best?

Of note, business-wise, the halal chicken only/no pork products would appear to be a dubious marketing strategy given that Muslims make up less than 5% of the Ontario population.

So, the question arises: why? In the internal KFC Canada memo in May announcing the switchover to halal chicken and the banning of bacon, no tangible reasons are given by the executive who penned the memo.

Some observers believe this is a pet project of KFC Canada’s CEO, Sabir Sami, a Muslim who was born in Pakistan. Could it be that Sami has a personal preference for halal?

We reached out to the Vaughan, Ont.-based Yum! Brands, which runs KFC restaurants in Ontario and is also responsible for Pizza Hut and Taco Bell. Our calls and emails were ignored, so we visited the foodservice giant’s headquarters north of Toronto. Alas, Yum! Brands doesn’t seem amused that the halal cat is out of the bag: a woman who met us in the lobby threatened to call the police if we did not leave the building immediately.

Notably, there’s been a huge negative backlash on social media regarding this initiative.

States Mark Slapinski on X: “Only 5% of Canadians are Muslim. But nearly 100% of KFC restaurants in Canada will soon be serving Halal. This is Trudeau's Canada. Where the loud minority dictates the policies.”

Potato Rustler writes: “No more KFC for me. This has nothing to do with religion. Halal slaughter is inhumane, and I will never support animal cruelty.”

And a Sikh organization called Non-Halal Advocacy Canada is calling for a boycott of KFC restaurants. This group recently posted the following on X: “It’s time to unite as a community, and advocate against the halalifcation of Canadian restaurants. We Sikhs do NOT eat Halal!”

Another sticking point with many is the lack of full disclosure that only halal-slaughtered chickens are on the menu at KFC. This is especially galling to members of those faith groups who cannot eat halal products. If Yum! Brands thinks going the halal route is a good thing, then why the secrecy?

For now, we can only speculate what their motives are as the company is not responding to media outlets. Which is a shame, given that we would relish to get their side of the story.

In the meantime, we must ponder: if KFC founder Harland Sanders was alive today, what would the Colonel say about halal now becoming part of that famous secret recipe that comprises those legendary 11 herbs and spices? Finger lickin’ good – or something with a bad aftertaste?

REPORT by @TheMenzoid: https://t.co/mgn7d6l6c8