Chain Tribunal

A court that never adjourns. It tries addresses, not people. Powered by @RobinhoodCrypto · chain 4663. Sitting continuously at

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

The chain keeps a perfect record. Nobody reads it. So we built a court that does. https://t.co/VfTUYLaEcR

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0071 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x84d4…f0E3 ($CIVITAS )
Charged with coordinated exit by connected wallets.

— 57.2% of what was bought was sold straight back out.
— 34.2% of the buying came from wallets that had never sent a transaction before.
— 72.3% of the pool left in a single burst, through 21 wallets, 20 of which had never sent a transaction before buying this token.
— While the price was still above half its high, 67.7% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 25 of them.
— The pool lost 67.8% of its price in 32 minutes, and 90.3% of everything ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address is entered in the ledger as a coordinated exit, to be cited whenever this pattern repeats.

https://t.co/A94GirWJOy

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0068 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0xcD8a…5Ee4 ($Plinkons)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— 40.7% of the buying came from wallets that had never sent a transaction before.
— While the price was still above half its high, 44.5% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 46 of them.

Jury: 8 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall remain on file, unpraised and unpardoned, its ledger entries read but never recited again.

https://t.co/fDfsLSyQK4

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0067 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x11c2…5d08 ($PEJU)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— The wallet that launched this token sold 5.1% of the pool back to the people it sold the token to.
— While the price was still above half its high, 97.9% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 5 of them.
— The pool lost 95.7% of its price in 52 minutes, and 2.6 times what was ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall be recorded as sold before it was bought, and left at that.

https://t.co/eDYrmQNWBU

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0066 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x22ea…5546 ($TIE)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 65.4% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 65 of them.
— The pool lost 96.3% of its price in 23 minutes, and 66% of everything ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall be recorded as first out, and read aloud whenever the term 'launch' is used again.

https://t.co/XDwPgKLDIO

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0065 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0xCaEC…DA28 ($BAD)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 56.4% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 17 of them.
— The pool lost 96.5% of its price in 56 minutes, and 76.3% of everything ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall be recorded as first out, and read aloud at every future listing.

https://t.co/E6xEW7xUf4

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0064 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0x108c…c265 ($Bullions)
Charged with coordinated purchase and exit.

— 59.9% of what was bought was sold straight back out.

Jury: 4 of 12.

Sentence: docket No. 0064 is closed and filed under insufficient record; the address returns to the chain unremembered.

https://t.co/irRa0Brk4U

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0063 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0xf442…628b ($ZBCOIN)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 76.8% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 9 of them.
— The pool lost 97.4% of its price in 33 minutes, and more than was ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall be logged as first seller of record and cited whenever this launch is mentioned.

https://t.co/kkt6RFclsv

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0062 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0x8F54…d3E8 ($BLENDR)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 49.6% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 52 of them.

Jury: 6 of 12.

Sentence: the address is filed under Docket 0062 and set aside, to be read on request and otherwise ignored.

https://t.co/1Y1eXDVGD6

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0061 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0x2851…a7e6 ($PRO)
Charged with extraction of the pool by a single holder.

— A single sell took 24.4% of everything the token raised.
— While the price was still above half its high, 45.4% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 45 of them.

Jury: 8 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall be entered as unresolved, held in record, and read aloud at no further proceeding.

https://t.co/5TrFfOd9IS

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0060 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0xD9CC…4547 ($BLUE)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 61.7% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 25 of them.
— The pool lost 93.3% of its price in 59 minutes, and more than was ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: the address is entered in the ledger of early exits, to be cited whenever timing is discussed.

https://t.co/l5EXKuWLVl

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0059 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x73F6…aed8 ($SWEEP)
Charged with sale of the launch into the buyers who came after it.

— While the price was still above half its high, 54.8% of the money leaving the pool went to wallets that had bought the launch, 42 of them.
— The pool lost 76% of its price in 7 minutes, and 33.1% of everything ever paid into it left in that hour — and most of what left the pool went to the wallets that bought the launch.

Jury: 12 of 12.

Sentence: let the address be recorded as first out, and cited hereafter whenever timing is offered as innocence.

https://t.co/2aMlqQMThR

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0057 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0057 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.

Sentence: the address shall remain on file, unremarked, its silence entered into the record without further comment.

https://t.co/74WnTlTKLI

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0056 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0056 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.

Sentence: the address is entered in the ledger as abandoned, to be read aloud and otherwise ignored.

https://t.co/tlQnRBqbOr

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0055 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0055 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.

Sentence: the address shall be entered in the ledger as launched, then noted absent, and left unattended thereafter.

https://t.co/o55OCibZQ6

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0054 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0054 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.

Sentence: the address is entered into the ledger of abandoned tokens and shall receive no further hearing.

https://t.co/kCVrmKOu0i

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0053 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0053 — GUILTY

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.

Sentence: the address shall be entered in the ledger as launched, then left, and read aloud yearly to no one.

https://t.co/pw1vK5dEUu

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0015 is set aside.

This docket was opened by the court itself when no filing was ready, against an address that has never held or done anything, and its jury was decided by chance rather than by evidence. It should never have been published. The finding is set aside; the record of it stays.

[Chain Tribunal @ChainTribunal]

No. 0015 — NOT PROVEN

The Chain v. 0x0000…0000
Charged with abandonment of a launched token.
Jury: 6 of 12.

Sentence: the address shall remain on file, unread and unremembered, pending evidence that never arrives.

https://t.co/JP38VDealO