We dropped Rust and our tests got 10x faster. Now one skill keeps agents from slowing them back down
The skill: /ruthless-bottleneck-destroyer
Name says it all
Install:
npx skills@latest add CheckPickerUpper/skills
To try it without installing anything:
npx skills@latest use CheckPickerUpper/skills@ruthless-bottleneck-destroyer
Or checkout the skill link in the bio
@phlndrws My favourite YouTube channel you always have such an elegant way of using analogies. and breaking down these huge complex concepts
Genuinely a skill In this era
@quakewang@rednafi I’d be very bullish on Zig. if the founder wasn’t so against AI. I can’t trust Zig. to move with the future if it’s stuck in that mindset
A big Chinese lab reached out to me asking for help distilling Fable into their model. I said no.
I told them to use the millions of books that have no copyright instead. Offered to help pick them and to help train the model a different way. They only wanted distillation, which tells you a lot about the mindset there.
I've worked deep in this field and distillation is real. I wasn't convinced at one point. What I saw changed my mind completely.
I'm the biggest supporter of open source. I'm for releasing weights and for the freedom to research and build, because humanity only grows when knowledge gets shared. But let's be logical.
Nobody will convince me that labs shipping a model every month or less, each one a big leap, now can't ship a better one after three months.
Kimi K3.1 Pro isn't a big leap over Kimi K3 and it's been about 100 days.
DeepSeek still can't put out a respectable Pro model.
Zai used to release their strongest model in under two months. It's been three with nothing.
All I hear about Qwen 4 Max is that it's a letdown.
Kimi K3.1 Pro and DeepSeek Flash both show traces of Astra distillation. The leak showed Moonshot used it, and so did DeepSeek.
If this isn't the effect of Anthropic blocking distillation then what is it?
Chinese labs need to get serious about using the talented researchers they have and give their models an identity. Right now their models at their best are a cheaper alternative. I want them out of that box. I want to see what makes them different.
Anthropic has crossed lines too, no argument there. They destroyed millions of books, human knowledge that was in people's hands, and kept it for themselves. I'll never forgive them for that.
But Chinese labs rely on distillation more than they rely on better data.
I didn't work with them. Transparency and honesty matter to me, like you've known since I started here.
@kimmonismus Have you used a google model? The last 2 I used were absolutely benchmaxxed slop so idk if they’re waiting because in reality and in practice it’s too slop to drop
@NithinMKurien I have a huge bias towards languages that KISS, OG go and its philosophy make it the best for me to each their own
Kotlin isn’t too shabby but doesn’t excite me and I’m not as familiar with it so I’d rather spend the time tussling with Odin
Some programs don’t mind the occasional Za Warudo, and I’d take that over stop the world compile times any day of the week and twice on Sundays
Also Odin is for when u need the speed
I need someone to articulate why Rust is better when so many of the rewrites don’t even use safe Rust throughout
And compile times become worse with multiple agents
Yet we are still hand waved as if the compiler isn’t literally the biggest bottleneck in the entire language, and worse yet, it’s read as the new language for AI
AI doesn’t need to use the washroom wall rust compiles, so we’re literally stuck waiting, or you get the privilege of splitting crates for fear of compiling for years or managing kache blaze sscache all in a futile attempt to get what languages beside rust get for free
Genuinely, why not just use another language? This is coming from someone who loved Rust, but I had to quit coping about it
The one good thing about Rust is that rewriting from Rust is so easy because the biggest blocker to most rewrites is: coping about the amount of time it would take to do so, and the sunkcost fallacy.
but you can never have the sunk cost fallacy when debatjng this issue becsuss long-term you will always be spending more time compiling than if you just rewrote whatever rust project in a proper language once.
Ask me how i know..
@Jawwwn I love the idea “you have to attack both”
I love Karp because to everyone he seems like such a contradiction, but that’s only if you presuppose that everything has to be binary. Let’s wealth tax and fight waste
Let’s Protect Civil Liberties and Fight Terrorism
Go makes sense, but why C ??? I see everyone saying C++is something to be used now.
Admittedly, I haven't written a single line of C++ code. Ever since I watched that "C++ is the worst language of all time video", I never had a use case and now it just seems like it's everything I hate about languages. Two billion ways to do things and a million and one ways to shoot your leg off
@rednafi@VicVijayakumar To play Devil's Advocate (And definitely not because I'm debating whether or not to write rewrite one of my apps in Go or another language.)
What do you say to people who say: "But its 1 type system for the whole app, isnt this a benefit thats worthwhile"
@kimmonismus The gap just keeps getting bigger and bigger, I'm trying to play devil's advocate for using ChatGPT, but I genuinely starting to see zero use case