@baroncoleman
Your opening yesterday deserves to be heard far beyond your audience.
It had the rarest kind of precision - the sort that doesn’t try to impress, yet leaves almost nowhere to hide.
I sat with a weight in my chest long after it ended. Rewatched it more times than I’m comfortable admitting.
I cut this short video so that precision can travel further. I also encourage everyone to watch the full opening on your YouTube channel.
Maybe this message finds someone else at exactly the right time.
Thank you. You’re right that attention feeds him. The multi-year harassment of that woman and the rest of the CharlesXII record was horrible!! Charlie still gave him a chance, though - and while Charlie was alive, Neff stayed largely quiet. That restraint vanished the day Charlie was gone.
@steveallert84@BlakeSNeff Charlie isn’t here anymore. That’s the point. The version of Blake we’re seeing now is the one that only came out after Charlie was gone
@GBaddie21144@TPUSA@tpusafaith@TPAction Exactly!! An organization that claims Christian values doesn’t get to look the other way when one of its public faces has a documented history of this s..t
@gypsyheart4God@BlakeSNeff He’s not just weak.
He’s the kind of weak that only feels powerful when he’s anonymous, degrading women, and calling for people to be lined up against a wall.
Now hehas a platform and still can’t hide what he is.
An Open Letter to TPUSA Leadership
There is a particular kind of institutional failure that only becomes visible after the founder is gone.
Turning Point USA once operated under a standard that treated the public square as a place for argument, facts, and the deliberate invitation of opposing voices. That standard was Charlie Kirk’s. The version that now platforms Blake Neff as one of its most visible public faces has abandoned it.
Neff arrived with a well-documented record. For years he posted as CharlesXII on AutoAdmit, producing sustained racial contempt, sexual degradation, and casual dehumanization that forced his resignation from Fox News in 2020. Charlie Kirk knew this history and still gave him a second chance. My assumption is that, in return, Neff remained largely silent on X. The restraint reflected the culture Charlie enforced: public voices were expected to argue rather than annihilate.
That filter ended on 10 September 2025. Within days Neff created an account on X and tweeted for the first time. The framing was careful: he had been “doxxed and fired,” Charlie had rescued him, and now it was his duty to help people remember him. Once the man who had restrained him was gone, the old language returned- the same racial contempt and pleasure in reducing opponents, especially women and Black women, to something less than human. “Vile witch.” “Coonspiracyslop.” The register was not new. It was simply no longer contained.
There is a particular energy in Neff’s recent posts. Not the energy of someone making a political argument, but the energy of someone who enjoys the act of contempt itself. The cruelty appears to be the point. That is the through-line from the CharlesXII years to the present.
Charlie once put it clearly: “You can tell a lot by who’s willing to have a conversation and who is not willing. Usually the people that are the ones protesting and not talking, are on the wrong side of history.”
He built an organization on the first side of that line. The current leadership has chosen the second. Contempt has replaced conversation. And the organization does not merely tolerate the change; it amplifies one of the men driving it.
Charlie would have shut this down. That is the simplest and most important fact. While he was alive, Neff stayed within certain lines. The lines vanished the moment Charlie did. This was never about whether Blake could grow. It was about whether anyone was still present who required him to.
Understanding that Blake Neff is still CharlesXII requires facing the full weight of that continuity. The record already answers whether he is a bigot. The more interesting question is institutional.
Charlie Kirk built an organization around argument. He debated hostile audiences. He insisted that ideas should survive scrutiny rather than insults. Whether you agreed with him or not, he understood the difference between defeating an argument and feeding off contempt.
Which leaves the questions that now write themselves.
Why did the leadership decide that a man with this documented history was suitable to become a primary public face after the founder’s death?
How does an organization that once measured itself by Charlie’s standard of argument now tolerate a style that substitutes sneer for substance and still claims to speak in his name?
No serious organization elevates someone like this without consequence. The choice reveals the priorities. And those priorities are no longer the standard Charlie set.
@RealCandaceO@baroncoleman@IanCarrollShow@JohnMappin@CarriePrejean1
We don’t know know. But we KNOW enough to ask WHY Gary “Not So Tactical” Melton’s timeline looks like this.👇
✅ 2014 - Paramount Tactical Solutions is founded.
✅ 2017 - Registered for federal contracting.
🎥 Between Sept. 11-23, 2025 - Gary publishes his CRUCIAL ANALYSIS video on YouTube, repeatedly insisting:
“THERE IS NO WAY a .30-06 round DIDN’T go through Charlie’s neck.”
❌ Up through Sept. 23, 2025 - There is not a SINGLE publicly reported federal contract award to Paramount Tactical Solutions!
🤔 Now comes the interesting part.
💰 Sept. 24, 2025 - U.S. Army contract: $39,474
💰 Sept. 28, 2025 - U.S. Army contract: $ 151,050
🗑️ Around that same time, Gary deletes the entire CRUCIAL ANALYSIS video and scrubs his X feed of this position.
🔄 Then the self-proclaimed ballistics expert suddenly abandons his own “THERE IS NO WAY a .30-06 round DIDN’T go through Charlie’s neck.” conclusion.
So what changed, Gary @paramounttactcl ?
Because the ballistics certainly didn’t.
Did your paycheck? 🤡💸💸
@baroncoleman@researcherdaisy@dailyfreddo@RealCandaceO@danksterintel@realhonestash@IanCarrollShow@TransSplendor@NihiloX@AnaEscobarShow