@KimptonNye That’s really cool. So it’s not exactly Humeanism per se that dissolves the measurement problem, rather it’s the conception of laws as some sort of useful summary/description/overlay on the ontology.
@KimptonNye Maybe not completely confused (it always makes sense to look for better systems), but Humeans should take seriously the possibility that the best system will use the concept of measurement.
@seanmcarroll I have had this thought about other debates, that they secretly turn on one's position re: eternalism/presentism. But I think I would be a one-boxer even if I thought presentism were true. Being vaguely Humean about causation seems enough.
@AgnesCallard Yes. This is how I always know exactly what time it is. After looking at a clock, my credences about the current time distribute themselves symmetrically around the actual time.
Battle of the Dorst Brothers(@Chris_Dorst). Only one winner.
And that winner is LEAP, the nonprofit my sister-in-law runs for education/college prep for underprivileged youths!
If you feel like donating, any bit is appreciated!
@GoFundMeCharity: https://t.co/swD0gTsGVM
@fitelson This seems quite important. If it's just one state that decides things, I can imagine the Republican legislature there doing something untoward with the selection of electors. But I can't see that happening if multiple states all have to go along.