@sunlorrie Has anyone here read the decision? The law would have sent an 18 year old with a picture of a 17 year old he didn’t even ask for to jail for a year. The law needs to be rewritten and 1 year is not enough: SC is right, but bad optics
@MichelleLA1981 They made the point that this would mean an 18 year old who had a photo of a 17 year old he might not even have asked for would be put in jail for a year under the law. It needs to be rewritten to apply to real child pornographers and if so one year minimum isn’t enough
@TorontoStar Fanning the flames of the perpetually disgruntled and dividing us against each other for political gains, personal ambition ahead of the country. We are under attack and we need wartime unity. Hoping PP matures after his defeat and constructively fills his opposition role.
@PierrePoilievre You realize that by pandering to the perpetually disgruntled if you are elected they will turn on you too after a brief honeymoon. The people you are trying to appeal to are not real adults who take responsibility for their own lives, they are blamers, target: who is in power?
@acoyne The comments below are very worrying. There is no way Comey is calling for assassination. He’s just say ditch Trump. It really doesn’t matter what 86 definition might have once meant. To normal people it means get rid of. Not kill.