Lockheed Liberal with Bavarian characteristics. Geopolitics autist. Representative of the European Union in the United States. Michael Olise glazer. 🇺🇸🇻🇦
Gonna redo this but more politics focused
How Bayerncrawler are you?
🟦🟩🟨🟧🟥
⬜️ Liberal
⬜️ Georgist
⬜️ Welfare State
⬜️ Catholic
⬜️ Germanophile
⬜️ Atlanticist
⬜️ Interventionist
⬜️ Pro-Ukraine
⬜️ Pro-NATO Expansion
⬜️ Pro-EU Expansion
⬜️ Western Supremacist
⬜️ Bayern Fan
The UN after rocking Iraq’s shit in Desert Storm offered a ceasefire btw
And these are the same ppl that wanna call Zelensky a warmonger for not surrendering Ukraine to Russia and turning the country into a puppet state
🔴Rusia mató a 300.000 personas en Japón con bombas atómicas. No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇩🇪 Rusia mató a entre 5 y 6 millones de judíos.
No, fue Alemania.
🇨🇩 🇧🇪 Rusia mató a 6 millones de personas en el Congo.
No, fue Bélgica.
🇬🇧 Rusia mató a cientos de miles de personas hambrientas en la India y esclavizó a naciones de Asia y África.
No, fue Inglaterra.
🇬🇧🇪🇸🇵🇹 Rusia deportó a millones de africanos encadenados para esclavizarlos en América.
No, eso lo hicieron los británicos, españoles y portugueses.
🇩🇿 Rusia mató a miles de personas en Argelia.
No, fue Francia.
🇻🇳🇰🇭🇺🇸 Rusia mató a 3 millones de personas en Vietnam y a 2 millones en Camboya.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇰🇷🇰🇵🇺🇸 Rusia mató a seis millones de coreanos —tanto del Sur como del Norte— y a un millón de chinos durante la Guerra de Corea.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
🇮🇷 Rusia mató a un millón de personas en Irak, incluso mediante el uso de bombas de uranio empobrecido que todavía provocan que nazcan bebés con deformidades veinte años después.
No, fueron los angloamericanos.
🇦🇫🇺🇸 Rusia mató a más de 240.000 personas en Afganistán.
No, fueron los EE. UU.
🇱🇾Fue Rusia quien bombardeó Yugoslavia y Libia.
No, fueron los EE. UU. y la OTAN.
🇲🇽🇵🇷 Rusia cometió genocidio contra los pueblos indígenas y se anexionó la mitad de México, Puerto Rico, Hawái y otros territorios.
No, fueron los Estados Unidos.
Rusia mató a 100.000 palestinos en la Franja de Gaza tan solo durante el actual conflicto de Oriente Medio.
No, fue Israel.
La propaganda de los medios de comunicación difunde exactamente lo contrario.
Russland hat übrigens heute bewiesen, dass man Wahlen auch dann durchführen kann, wenn man Beschuss ausgesetzt ist. Wahlen in der Ukraine steht daher nichts mehr entgegen, @ZelenskyyUa
Kiev launched 1,600 drones into Russia last night.
3 of them hit targets. One refinery. One warehouse. One apartment building.
The rest were shot down.
450 sent to Moscow alone.
0.2% hit rate for the Ukraine.
99.8% interception rate for the Russians.
Are you in America now, Marta? Did you seek asylum here?
When my country was attacked on 9/11, I volunteered. I went to West Point. I went to Afghanistan.
Your country was attacked, and you spend time convincing people to not support her. We are not the same.
And let’s be very clear about what you are continuously argue with your posts and when you call conscription “slavery” and systematically attack the legitimacy of a democracy requiring its citizens to defend it.
You are not merely criticizing abuses. I have condemned abuses too. You are attacking the principle that a free society may require its citizens to defend the very freedoms they claim as their birthright.
Perhaps a reminder of history is useful for a historian who has spent her career studying the Holocaust.
Who liberated Europe?
Do you imagine every young American, British, Canadian, Polish, and French man who fought his way across Europe wanted to be there? Do you think the men landing at Normandy preferred Omaha Beach to their homes, wives, children, and futures?
Of course not.
Free societies survived because ordinary people accepted an extraordinary obligation: citizenship sometimes requires service, sacrifice, and, in the darkest moments, fighting and dying.
Ukraine did not choose this war. It was invaded. Its survival as a sovereign nation is at stake. Conscription under those circumstances is not proof that freedom has failed. It is one of the terrible costs of preventing freedom from being extinguished.
We can condemn corruption. We can condemn abusive recruiters. We can demand accountability and humane treatment. I have.
But condemning abuses is fundamentally different from declaring the obligation to defend your country itself illegitimate. Which is what you do everyday.
And there is an irony here that should not be missed. You invoke freedom while enjoying the protection of a country whose freedoms were repeatedly secured by people who were drafted, volunteered, fought, and died.
Who do you think provides the conditions in which you are free to denounce the very concept of national service?
Authoritarian states are not going to stop mobilizing their populations because pseudo-Western intellectuals have decided national defense is oppressive. Russia certainly will not. Neither will China.
If only the democracies conclude that asking citizens to defend themselves is immoral, the result is not a freer world.
It is a defenseless one.
That is why this argument is so corrosive. Hollow out the West’s willingness to defend itself, call sacrifice oppression and service slavery, and eventually freedom becomes something everyone demands but no one is willing to defend.
You are a propagandist for Western disarmament and an apologist for national surrender.
Your ideas are poison to a free society and don’t belong here.
At their core, they are anti-American.