@tdsfixer@spencerpratt Kara is a writer. She is not that smart. Always angling for a board seat or to consult for Meta. But no one wants her for any operating or advising role.
“Harry will reportedly extend an invitation to the Invictus Games to King Charles, in what is seen as a major olive branch from the estranged royal, who wishes for a PUBLIC REUNION with his father.”
He’s finally saying the quiet part out loud: he doesn’t want a real relationship - he wants to use his dad to prop up his brand.
Harry and Meghan’s only real value was always their royal connection. Without it, almost nothing they touch succeeds. Their only two hits: a documentary about their time inside the family and Harry’s tabloid book attacking it. Everything else has flopped.
They’re growing increasingly desperate. The money has dried up, they’re facing a huge bill from Harry’s latest court loss, and another lawsuit with Sentebale and Dr. Sophie Chandauka is already on the horizon.https://t.co/aJhWr5VijC
The cultural irony of AI safety: Chinese models can audit code and find vulnerabilities; Western models put guardrails around the same work because they cannot reliably determine whether the user is maintaining the code or hunting for a zero-day to exploit. Kimi as a preview.
@according2_taz Meghan was never in Portugal.
The country only referenced it after the date for publicity. Even Costa Terra is practically bankrupt and needs the press.
🚨 BREAKING: The invasion of Spain is ONGOING as traffic in Morocco leading up to the border is now gridlocked for over TEN MILES
Police estimate 20,000 ILLEGAL AFRICANS have crossed today alone.
Before today, the population of Ceuta was only 80,000.
Spain is falling.
h/t @visegrad24
No one's disputing the 1.16m reach, but if you think that's is a win, you're missing the real point. Reach = clicked on for 60 seconds to grab a screenshot. When your actual average audience plummets down to 738k, a 36% drop-off, that shows what a joke the 1.16 was. The industry runs on the 738k number.
Diana was buried on a private island, at her private ancestral home, precisely to avoid the kind of ghoulish exploitation Meghan Markle seems to have engaged in here. Nothing and no one is sacred to this desperate and vile woman.
https://t.co/aab4IY1LcA
No one's disputing the 1.16m, but if you think that's is a win, you're missing the real point. Reach = clicked on for 60 seconds to grab a screenshot. When your actual average audience plummets down to 738k, a 36% drop-off, that shows what a joke the 1.16 was. The industry runs on the 738k number.
Just don't use a chatbot if you're looking for official proof. Look at any article with a wider range of numbers like the TV Tonight from July 27:
Cites the episode pulling 738k national viewers, tying its 2026 season high, not setting a 17-year record. It lost to the Commonwealth Games (964k) and tied Lego Masters (733k). The 1.16M and all-time top 3 claims are completely made up.
The 17-year record claim is complete fiction. MasterChef pulled 3 to 4 million viewers per episode back in 2010.
That 1.16M is total reach is a metric that was driven by controversy. The actual metric that measures people who stayed and watched the show is Average Audience, which was 738,000. Social media noise got people to look for 60 seconds, but didn't stick, which is why the episode still lost the night to the Commonwealth Games (964k avg).
That statement is completely inaccurate. In MasterChef’s 17-year history, almost every Sunday finale and major special during the first 10+ seasons pulled over 2M to 5M viewers (the Season 2 Sunday finale hit 5.7M national peak).
The ~0.7M average audience for Meghan’s episode is just a normal, solid Sunday for 2026. Nowhere near the top 3 all-time.
@unreMARKLEble Average audience is the metric TV networks and advertisers actually care about. MasterChef Sundays averaged ~0.7M all season, and Meghan’s episode was no different at ~0.7M. Quoting "total reach" shows they know it was a flop.