They purposely made the signature verification laughably weak, and then flooded mailboxes with ballots that don't belong. Anyone who wants to fill them out can and there's no way they're going to get caught. That's true whether they're illegal aliens, or legitimate voters that have more ballots than they should.
@WarlordDilley Representatives from CA shouldn't be on any committees and to the extent possible should be removed from positions of power until their election laws are changed to ensure vote integrity.
When you remove voter ID requirements and rely heavily on mail-in ballots, you’ve effectively stripped away two of the biggest safeguards against election fraud. That’s not a coincidence—it’s a choice.
Raman ‘defeating’ Pratt is the latest example—but it won’t be the last.
Even if one of them narc’ed, a homeless drug addict’s testimony is unreliable.
What’s even more sinister is that the NGOs could be registering them to vote to an address the NGO has control over, and then returns the ballots without them even knowing.
No witnesses.
If California’s voter rolls are accurate, why is Sacramento fighting a federal audit?
I carried legislation (TWICE) to help remove deceased voters from the rolls. Democrats killed it in committee.
Now CA is spending taxpayer dollars trying to block a review of those same voter rolls.
Transparency shouldn’t be controversial.
If there’s nothing to hide, why fight so hard to stop Californians from getting answers?
The Save America Act isn't going to pass. Fine.
The simplest remedy for California's third-world elections is to simply refuse to seat any members of their House caucus who weren't ahead on Election Day.
No new legislation needed. No Senate consent needed.
If Nithya drops out then Spencer Pratt moves forward. There should be intense public pressure to make her do so. She conceded because she knew she lost and this fraud of an election should not be accepted.
This has to stop now.
If we ran the California election requiring ID, paper ballots, in person voting, and ink your thumb so you can only vote once we all know the results would be dramatically different.
The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department used helicopters to fly in ballots from vote centers across the region
“They're picking up ballots from 8 cities including Lancaster, Santa Clarita, Palmdale, Lakewood, Santa Monica, Van Nuys, Pomona, and Torrance. Once they arrive, the ballots are securely transferred inside where election workers are receiving and processing millions of ballots”
The reason they do this is because LA is huge, over 4,700 miles big
There are 5.8 million registered voters that has a single Ballot Processing Center in the City of Industry
All ballots from vote centers across the vast county are brought here for counting after polls close. Driving from remote areas like the Antelope Valley, Lancaster, Palmdale takes hours, so helicopters get ballots in faster, reducing delays in reporting and minimizing time ballots sit in transit
What I find interesting is this seems like the perfect opportunity to introduce as many mail in ballots as needed without any questions
This also use one processing center. This means they wouldn’t have to coordinate rigging elections across multiple offices. If could be one easy to control operation at this one facility
We need a federal audit of California elections
If there’s no fraud, great. But I think we all know there’s massive fraud
Sitting down?
There are at least 165 NGOs in California that handle $100 million per year dedicated to voter registration and elections.
Helping Democrats steal elections and American taxpayers are paying for it.
Not a single penny of taxpayer money should go to NGOs.
Sick.
California is single-handedly and severely undermining confidence in America’s electoral process.
From that rigged “Gavin Newscum Recall Election,” up to now—it’s clear that the cheat is built in.
It’s a national security issue at this point.
California Is Blocking a Federal Audit of Its Voter Rolls
California allows first-time voters to register using forms of ID that most Americans would find surprising, including:
-Gym membership card
-Employer ID card
-Credit or debit card
-Prescription drug label
-Insurance card (California provides free health coverage to undocumented immigrants)
Full list: https://t.co/BvfviJsYG8
This is permitted when a voter fails to provide a Social Security number or driver’s license at registration. Our office believes this policy deserves a closer look.
We also have serious concerns about how California maintains its voter rolls. There are open questions about whether the state is promptly removing deceased voters, people who have moved, and individuals convicted of disqualifying felonies.
On top of that, California allows third parties to collect and turn in ballots on voters’ behalf (a practice known as ballot harvesting) with few restrictions. This makes it difficult to track who actually received, completed, and submitted each ballot.
For over a year, the Department of Justice has been trying to audit California’s voter rolls. Federal law gives the Attorney General the authority to review state voter files and confirm that only eligible U.S. citizens are voting in federal elections.
@AAGDhillon sent California a letter explaining our legal authority. California refused to comply, claiming state privacy laws block the review, an argument that does not hold up because those laws don’t apply to the federal government in this context. We’ve sued California in federal court, and the case is before the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.
If California genuinely wants voters to trust its elections, it should open its records, not fight to keep them closed.
What are they afraid of?