@Edeaulx So then right now you need to demand that movies depicting anyone dying from gun violence are BANNED. Any movie that depicts crime should be ILLEGAL. Because surely you agree that murder is not a “human right”?
This is beyond belief! You need to demand it now!
@Aameridoll@grok we are not, we are talking about how the arguments used to ban CSAM were predicted and now used to ban things that are not CSAM. Just as they will be used to ban things like “depicting homosexual relationships” or “portraying abortion as ‘healthcare’” when my side wins. :)
@Fertilizering@depressolesbo They did not “have to get purged”. The site changed their policy to no longer allow uploads from independent users. That made up 75% of their total hosted content. You are trying to imply 75% of it all was illegal and “had to be purged”
@raine_lantern They host televised, fancy annual awards shows for every category of person involved in producing porn. And the people accept those awards. Does this sound like the actions of someone forcibly raped and filmed?
You are simply making things up
@nonlinear_james@M_Kesselfieber The irony of your snide claim is that, if true, it means that “believing all women” has mathematically a 100% rate of falsely incarcerating innocent men
@DanManyika@Farida_N No, because the payments were not a stimulus check. The government was literally declaring that something formerly sold industrially like “18-wheelers” was illegal to use now. The payment wasn’t to thank the farmers, it was to avoid committing “theft” in historical narratives
@jjhendricksx@internetkyler@Boopa1219 They did not. If they had, they wouldn’t have stopped the streak of inventing with rap, and then created nothing else but more rap for a century. A genre built on sampling existing music into loops and “rhyming real good” is not where a race of music prodigies decide to finish
@Aameridoll@grok This is because I believe in free speech. It is a human right to express yourself to others, and a survival imperative for the human race that no one be given authority to declare speech can be punished when “harmful” (I.e. risky to people who cannot be seen as ‘wrong’ ever)
@DanManyika@Farida_N But you also believe that slavery was the only reason for industry existing (“built on the backs of slaves”). If the government suddenly crushed all food/civil production on disputed morals, despite the former total legality of owning slaves, the nation would collapse into war
@freeznutz@wode_maya So the people “stealing” your intelligent books of “facts” are themselves just demonstrating intelligence. Would you prefer they didn’t read at all to avoid learning “facts”? I doubt this, but it’s your own claim.
@untinakie@Aameridoll@grok What a claim. Most porn now is created by independent female OnlyFans performers, who brag about “easy money”. The nature has also changed dramatically, from classic “series of sex acts” to rampant “pretend to fuck dogs or be in kindergarten.” Women drove this, enthusiastically.
@TheCatFromMars@DOmowale so you were there? You saw the things that the abolitionists luridly claimed? The claims that made people morally obligated to abolish and condemn the exact practice the authors wanted abolished, the people they wanted condemned, while leveraging “my version wasn’t as bad.”
@SavvyWroteThat This is why your boogeyman of “racism” has zero power anymore. You want it to be an aura around blacks that literally means anything you want, so you can declare that everything you dislike is racism but only for you. Nobody cares about being called racist anymore.
@DanManyika@Farida_N That was not a consolidation prize or a reward. It was a choice to peacefully provide some financial authenticity (like a gun “buyback”) without forcing a civil war as suddenly every working farm and factory lost the units of labour they had paid for.
@VonMelena11751@WomenReadWomen How different is that really from how someone views Tom Cruise while watching Mission Impossible? No one is seriously thinking of an actor as “human” while watching them act. They’re thinking of them as a character, an object in a story.
@Petersbrooking@LolsysL@LoinDuTribu I’m probably not going to bring him up in conversation if that’s what you mean. He lived and died with zero significance, like most people. But he was black so you had to saddle him with first “genius” and now “sanctity”. And you do this not from naivety but from selfishness.