No, every single piece of evidence suggests he was INVOLVED in the murder of Charlie. Nothing directly links that gun to the bullet in his neck. No video of him taking the shot and no ballistic evidence linking the bullet. I cant speak for others but I have never denied that. I certainly don't think he is an innocent man but the vague information from the autopsy is really what caused this. If they could simply demonstrate the angle of attack/entry and clarify if it was the bullet core that impacted his spine, this would be cleared up in 5 minutes.
See this is the issue I'm having. I always thought that they claimed that it fragged before the spine and that a fragment hit his spine. Those are 2 very different things. If the bullet itself straight hit the spine, at the right angle it is possible for there not to be an exit wound. The angle makes all the difference in the world. But the idea that it was shallow attack angle and 3 inches of straight flesh would stop the round is just silly. I give up. We need to see the autopsy and learn these angles. Until then its all speculation really.
DO you have the original autopsy report or any information regarding the angle of attack? Did the report ever say where on the spine the bullet stopped? Was it the main body of the bullet in his spine? Did the spine break? I've been looking everywhere and cant find any reliable info. I've been basing my opinion on the idea that the bullet only had to travel 2-3 inches. Then fragments hit his spine. Not the main core. If this is wrong and the angle was higher and his spine was shattered, that changes things ALOT and could make the story plausible after all. JUST RELEASE THE AUTOPSY mr government and all this would be cleared up very quickly.
Anyone have a copy of the actual autopsy report ? I think most of us talking in good faith are arguing past each other and going off different information. I need to know what the angle of attack was along with the length of the wound channel before it was stopped by the spine of steel. From what I remember Tyler was not elevated much. That would mean a very short distance to his spine. I also don't recall them saying the bullet hit his collarbone . Any ifo would be appreciated.
I don't recall them saying that the built broke his spine and fragged. I'm also not finding the report itself so I don't know what the angle of impact was. The shooter being at an "elevated position" is relative to how "elevated" Charlie was. Judging by the pictures the angle wasn't very steep. Regardless if the bullet had to travel more than 6-8 inches to reach his spine it is plausible to not have an exit wound but I would certainly expect for the spine to be shattered. Would be nice to know how long the wound track is. Makes all the difference in the world. Unless Mr misfit has more information than the rest of us he is making a lot of assumptions to make this work.
@FenixAmmunition Then why don't you make a video of a correct one. Yes its not a 1 to 1. There is a difference in the fluid dynamics BUT its a hell of a lot closer than any other videos people are posting.
Again, you aren't wrong but when I heard him he was simply using it as an example of a directional explosion. It doesn't matter how and what is used. You are arguing semantics over the point being made. Which was yes you could create a device that could "shoot" something into his neck. Listen the dude gets on my nerves to but just calling a spade a spade.
I don't disagree with the first part and I have said from the beginning that a sub sonic load could MAYBE explain it. 2 issues with it being a sub. First they would know by the headstamp what load it had and how old the ammo is. Nothing they have presented says that it was a sub round. But lets say he tampered with it and hand loaded. Now you are shooting a sub sonic at 140 yards. Now your accuracy is greatly reduced to about 4 MOA. Not great when trying to assassinate someone. But again, they haven't claimed it was a sub sonic load and the headstamp doesn't suggest it either. Now the bullet type. Yes it is a "soft point" but it is a JACKED soft point. There is a BIG difference. Normal lead soft points are designed to immediately expand and fragment. If this was the bullet they have shown, it would make sense. But its not. They are claiming a JACKETED soft point. Which means that it is STILL designed to penetrate about 4-6 inches THEN expand. Its for hunting large animals. Charlie was shot in t he neck. 3 inches of meat tops. No mention of it even hitting his spine outside of fragments. That round in just muscle and flesh would have zipped right through his neck. If it had impacted his spine, there is a chance it stays in his body but it would have shattered his spined and that's where the fragments would be. Thats not what they have told us.
People in the crowd and twitter posts saying that Charlie was going to be murdered that day. People in the crowd celebrating and claiming responsibility in an attempt to confuse cops. I could go on BUT if the Ballistics made sense and the recovery of the rifle and the stories about his get away made sense. I wouldn't be saying a word. The bottom line is that none of those things make sense. I also find it very convenient that the split on this issue somehow relates to how most people feel about Israel. If you are pro-Israel Tyler did it end of story. The trannies are to blame. If you think something is wrong with the story those same people insist that you are now a jew hater and think everything Candice says is fact. That forced paradigm alone should tell you something. For the record. I think half of what Canadice has come up with regarding Erika was dumb. I think some of her sources are extremely suspect. What I do know is I have weapons experience. I know people with more than me. Not 1 of us thinks the story makes sense from a ballistics stand point and I challenge you to find 1 that does. The only nonsense I hear on twitter are people spreading videos about SAND penetration and calling it evidence. Its just dumb.
Well here is a bullet lesson for you: Straight from Co-pilot AI
Soft Point Bullets Without a Jacket
A soft point bullet without a jacket is essentially a plain lead bullet with a soft lead tip exposed at the nose. Unlike jacketed soft points, it has no copper or other metal casing, so the entire bullet is made of lead, with the tip left open to allow expansion on impact Wikipedia.
How They Work
Construction: The bullet is a solid lead core with the lead tip exposed. When it strikes a target, the softer lead deforms and expands, creating a larger wound channel than a full lead round Wikipedia.
Expansion: The exposed lead tip initiates deformation, which can cause the bullet to mushroom or fragment, increasing tissue damage TheGunZone.
Penetration: Because thereβs no jacket to hold the bullet together, expansion can be more pronounced, but penetration is generally less than with jacketed bullets.
Get it now. Jacket soft points STILL penetrate. The just penetrate less than full FMJ then expand. They are also designed to not fragment like anormal PLAIN soft point.