Accurate. It lines up with latency we see.
This is also HL’s own doing. They force all orders to go through their public API.
You can set up your own read only mode to get faster data but as far as I know (someone please correct me if I’m wrong and point me to it) you cannot submit orders directly over the protocol.
So you are at the mercy of their public API servers which are notoriously slow and perhaps under invested in. It also gets worse during extreme volatility which is fun, too!
Lighter doesn’t have the same liquidity but it’s significantly better latency
@perkinscr97 This…it’s the largest blocker to a functioning market.
Banking regulatory capital is a sneaky way to block an asset because unless you were forced to take numerous yearly banking reg cap modules in a bank it makes the average persons eyes glaze over.
Conspiracy theory time…what if Tradfi firms are selling the shit out of crypto right now in order to whip Coinbase and the crypto community on the whole into line to accept the CLARITY act
Asked about the CLARITY Act on @SquawkStreet today. Leaders like @Sen_Alsobrooks and @RubenGallego are the reason it's moving but the crypto crowd needs to get in line and stop the whining and push it right now.
Crypto is helpful to under-served communities and now is the time to get this done.
The hard part about trying to build businesses in crypto isn't that the price volatility is crazy, it's that the price volatility makes it practically impossible to do business planning...every time you think, "this market is maturing, let's plan for the future"...you get met with 6 months of brutal hell where nobody does any business and you just have to cock-roach to survive
Funny to think about the second and third order effects of regulation on financial markets:
> Jane Street, HRT, and XTX all exist today as "Non Bank Financial Institutions" because of Dodd Frank (IMHO)
> The prevailing wisdom was that trading revenues were "low quality earnings" and that proprietary trading was too risky for banks.
> This meant that Banks started over-indexing on fee-based revenues
> They missed out that a high quality systematic trading desk is a lot more stable revenue than wall street analysts gave them credit for.
> Now Jane Street, HRT, and XTX are absolutely crushing it and at the leading edge of AI and systematic trading.
@dev0xx_@ChipotleTweets I love this...I'll exact my revenge one way or another. Their AI bot responded to me as well, so I'm sure I ate up at least 4oz of chicken worth of compute credits for them to play defense on my original post.
Just ordered @ChipotleTweets for the first time in years…it’s 2x the price and literally half the food.
This is just sad. Did you guys get acquired by a third-tier PE firm recently?
Massively talking my own book here...but with Jane Street, XTX, and HRT making record profits and unleashing AI resources that make the frontier labs jealous...I think it's time the market take a deeper look at the revenue quality of systematic trading shops.
Even if you don't believe @fundstrat or @dunleavy89 about how the institutions are coming and ETH will likely capture a metric ton of institutional RWA value.
Then bank on boomers sending a few points of their stack towards "Dino Coins" on a BTFD trade.
Vibe right now —
Crypto twitter: “after 15 years, this might be the year it’s over for [new recent reason]”
Financial advisor I’m with at happy hour in Florida: “saw price is down, it’s time to buy right? It’s amazing to finally have access.”
Somehow the roles have flipped upside down in 2026.
It's interesting to me that despite the narratives around ETH...it really just trades like an interest rates product. If you look at it through that lense then this all makes total sense.
@VivekVentures One could argue that the EF’s pool of ETH going down to ~16bps of supply is actually a REALLY good thing for a credibly neutral global financial settlement layer…last time I checked decentralization was sort of the point, right?
Didn't say I was fading Hyperliquid? This is more of a statement that as crypto grows up these fantastic products are going to have to face deeper and more well funded competition, and that I would like to see Hyperliquid retain more of its earnings so they can reinvest it back into winning. Token buybacks are short sighted IMHO.
This. I love HL, but this is the exact scenario in which HYPE holders maybe wished the money spent on token buybacks was held in reserves for the lobbying it will take to make sure they win this battle
CFTC approves perps and HYPE moons which proves that crypto traders have absolutely no concept of second-order effects. If anything Hyperliquid will lose it's regulatory arbitrage advantage to licensed players like Coinbase and others which offer a secure controlled environment.
They do...and that is the correct thing. But I'm afraid they are going to be bringing a knife to a gun fight. Coinbase, NYSE, CME, JP Morgan all have much bigger lobbying arsenals.
I love HYPE, love Hyperliquid...I just am being an old curmudgeon who thinks that this is going to be a big fight and I want to make sure they are armed properly.