@P2Sgt@mcjaynald_s@Pro_LifeBaby@davidfholt 1952 vs 2000. Do you think all these people and their families switched states?? Or did the party platforms switch? Which makes more sense to you?
@CoachCHutch9@js9inningsmedia The foul line extends vertically. If any part of ball was over the edge of line, it is fair, even if bottom of ball is in contact with foul territory.
@e_toale76808@cmb0130@TalkinBaseball_ How in your opinion was it wrong when the rule was clearly applied correctly? You may not like the way the rule is written, but it was applied correctly by the umpiring crew.
@hasbybets@BobHenryRob@TalkinBaseball_ Because the foul line extends vertically by rule. So any part of the ball being over the edge of the line makes a ball a fair ball, even if bottom of ball is touching foul territory.
@san_domo93888@zackplascencia9@TalkinBaseball_ The foul line extends vertically by rule. So any part of the ball being over the foul line on a ground ball, even if the bottom of ball is touching foul territory is considered a fair ball.
@e_toale76808@cmb0130@TalkinBaseball_ The foul line extends vertically by rule. So if the edge of the ball is over any part of the line, it is a fair ball, even if bottom of ball is touching foul territory.