Daniel could not get rid of the fact that his parents are Iranians who belong to the Shia sect. They raised him well so that he could practice Shia Taqiyya (which is showing the opposite of what one conceals).
He says, 'I am a Sunni,' but all his actions revolve around supporting Iran, the Shias, and the Houthis, and he exploits the name of Palestine just as Iran does, while the Houthis demand the destruction of Mecca.
Daniel, you are the filthiest and dirtiest person after Abraha al-Ashram.
These Houthis, their ancestors wanted to destroy the Kaaba with Abraha al-Ashram, and now, from the very same place, they are trying to strike Mecca with the support, applause, and blessing of the dirty Shia Daniel. Look at them and their appearances—qat and drug addicts, child rapists and murderers.
Look, you can almost see the curse of God on their faces
This is what happens when we debate a Shia (donkey). You invent a scenario in your head and talk about it.
The first time, I only asked you two simple questions, and you claimed in your reply that I said you killed him! And now, I said Al-Husayn left peacefully, and you claimed that I said he pledged allegiance to Yazid! You carry the exact same mindset of the past Shia: you assume something and act on something else—just like their assumption that Al-Husayn wouldn’t fight Yazid, so they left him to die; and like the assumption of the 12 Imams; and like the assumption that the Mahdi is over 1,200 years old and will emerge soon.
As for the rest of your words, it is just personal attacks, as is the habit of the Shia—nothing but braying.
I will stop replying here, you little donkey.
Debating you is completely fruitless, and people can find out the truth from the previous replies.
I am not surprised by your vocabulary and your personal attack on me and my father, because you are a Shiite who has nothing but barking. I did not say the Shiites killed him, but it seems you know that you killed him. My first question: how does a person reach his army and find no army (because they failed him) and made him die in order to create a cause out of him? The second question: if Al-Hussein had gone out to fight Yazid, no sane person on earth would go out to war with his children, women, daughters, and sisters, and not even companions went out with him. This means that Al-Hussein went out peacefully to Yazid, and the people of Kufa became angry because he was going to make peace, so they killed him. When you use your mind as a human being, you see the truth clearly. If you use it as a Shiite, you become a braying donkey that does not understand. My ancestors were the ones who supported the Prophet when you and the Shiites were worshiping fire (Magianism). My ancestors are the companions of the Messenger, and your ancestors are children of Mut'ah and fire-worshipers. Look at the Shiites in these attached videos who are fighting Mecca and Islam, just like you.
The Concept of Direction in Early Islamic Geography: Orientation Based on the East
In early Arabic and Islamic tradition, geographical nomenclature was not originally rooted in fixed political borders, but rather in "Orientation"—the positioning of oneself relative to the rising sun (the East).
When a person stands at the Kaaba in Mecca, facing the East (Al-Mashriq), the directions are defined as follows:
• In Front (East / Al-Mashriq): The direction of the rising sun.
• Behind (West / Al-Maghrib): The direction of the setting sun.
• To the Right (South / Al-Yameen): This is the origin of the term "Al-Yaman" (Yemen). Historically, it did not refer to the modern political borders of the State of Yemen; instead, it literally meant "the land or direction to the right of the Kaaba." This regional designation encompassed the entire southern expanse of the Arabian Peninsula.
• To the Left (North / Al-Shamal): This is the origin of the term "Al-Sham" (the Levant). It literally meant "the direction to the left of the Kaaba," describing the entire northern region.
Therefore, names like Yemen and Sham originally signified geographical directions and spatial relationships relative to the Kaaba, rather than the defined nation-states we know today.
You have to ask yourself two questions: First, who told Hussein, "Come out, we are waiting for you, and we have an army to support you," yet when he arrived, he found no one and nobody stood with him? Who set this ambush? The second question: if Hussein went out to fight, how could he take all the women and children with him, while not taking weapons and an army? Our real problem is with the Shia who played the devil's role in this war, and our second problem is that some people lack intellect and worship Hussein, may Allah be pleased with him, instead of Allah. Finally, Allah created you to worship Him, not to scream and cry for 1400 years over the death of the Prophet's grandson, believing that in this way you are a Muslim and will enter Paradise.
Unlike the rest of humanity, you are defined only by your mother. A Jew is the only one traced back to their mother because they have a problem determining the father. First, go find someone who acknowledges your lineage, and leave Saudis alone. They are the only people on Earth who know their paternal ancestry, father to grandfather, all the way back to Ishmael, son of Abraham.
@ye02987 هذي حرب
(السعوديه واليمن) ضد الحوثه
انجاس خلق الله..
ونهايتها نصر بإذن وتوفيق الله
الحوثي يلفظ انفاسه الأخيره
سيتم استئصاله واتباعه من اليمن الى الأبد ان شاء الله.
@KR3Wmatic Forget about Prophet Muhammad's grandfather and others, because you won't believe any proof we present to you anyway. However, the Old World monkeys that (atheists) evolved from consist of 166 species. The question is: can you tell us which species is your grandfather?"
When the Companions strictly adhered only to the Quran and the Sunnah, they were able to overthrow the two greatest empires.
The Battle of Yarmouk is the best example; the Muslims numbered approximately 25,000 to 30,000, while the Romans had 240,000 to 300,000 fighters.
The common factor among Muslims at that time was Tawheed (monotheism) and true Islam.
I understand the strength you desire for Muslims today, but it will not be achieved while we are divided into numerous sects and factions, tearing each other apart daily. The solution exists, but some prefer to be servants to graves and shrines instead of being monotheistic Muslims.
"There is no such thing as a Wahhabi movement, and it is not a new invention like Sufism and Shiism. The whole matter is that we worship Allah just as the Prophet and the Companions worshipped Him, associating nothing with Him. If your only concern is to stand against the world, go and adopt Judaism, for they possess the land and the power. As for us Muslims, our condition will never change as long as we have the Book of Allah and the Sunnah of the Prophet, yet we disobey Him, pray to those in graves, and believe that Allah created the earth for 12 Imams from the lineage of the Prophet, along with these superstitions that have nothing to do with Islam, and then we complain that we are weak."
@Phenomenon92_48 انا لو اني مسؤل في عمان
بتلك مع اذنك
احرجت دولتك والناس والعمانيين بموضوعك الغبي
وبعدين وش ذنب صاحب بطاطس عمان لو قاطعناه الحين بيخسر
وانت لو قاطعتنا مادرينا عنك
@trapezius77@TahrirFilastein Yes, that is the Houthi: a group of Qat and drug addicts who love raping children, and who kill anyone who opposes them or tries to flee from them.