@MitchellAmador What I mean is, if a protocol is listed on Immunefi, and a valid bug is found and confirmed by Immunefi too, they shouldn't have the option to not to pay.
@MitchellAmador Hi Mitchell, while I appreciate Immunefi a lot, I think it would be better to spend time on making sure that the protocols on Immunefi actually always pay for valid bugs. I've been seeing on my timeline ppl talking about getting ghosted by protocols and Immunefi can't do anything
Announcing First Flight #27: Trick or Treat!
nSLOC: 109
Start date: October 24, 2024 Noon UTC
Duration: 1 week
Get real auditing experience!
Check it out! 👇
(1/2)
@GalloDaSballo Hi Alex, thank you for onebugperday, but I have a feedback: Currently it is NOT possible to unsubscribe from the email list, because the confirmation code never shows up. I needed to block and mute the address from the account I want to unsubscribe...
Also I was wondering why platforms like Sherlock or Codehawks had a field for deposit address even though you were already connecting via your browser wallet. That's why I guess.
You know how you need to be very careful with your Metamask wallet seed phrase, that you need to write it down somewhere safe and if you lose it, you'll -supposedly- lose access to your funds forever? Well, I just found out that it is not the case at all.
🚨 New contest: Rumpel Point Tokenization Protocol @RumpelLabs 🚨
Sign up here: https://t.co/fgS8JDa6cp
Total Rewards: 16,000 USDC
nSLOC: 498
Lead Senior Watson: @0xSimao
Starts Monday, August 26th at 15:00 UTC
Check it out!!