@KawasakiRoo Huh? I'm not doubling back. I'm saying a boring democrat career politician beat Trump by being a boring democrat career politician instead of a chaotic daily train wreck. Are you confused?
@KawasakiRoo Omg with the "but what about palestine" shit. That shit started before Biden was even born & has been happening throughout every US presidency since the 40's, dem or republican. Whiny fuckers decided 2024 was the time to find out about it and make it their whole life. Spare me.
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones Are you saying Pelosi was a bad and ineffective politician? Really? Is that where you want to go? She's probably the only politician who had their foot on Trump's throat for his entire 1st term and mitigated damage from his recklessness.
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones + literal idiots traded safe and boring politicians for a mad man because it's entertaining for them. People and media alike wanted Trump because somebody new and crazy is happening every day. Do you know how peaceful it was with Biden in charge for 4 years? PEACEFUL AF.
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones No, I prefer politicians who are stable & know what they are doing. Politicians who are boring, middle of the road figures that stand in the back and lead without explosions and breaking news every goddamn second. This is also part of why Trump got elected twice +
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones + when you look at people like Obama, Pelosi, etc. they all had great political skills because this was their career. Not a trendy fad. Career politicians should be considered above random townspeople who wanna run government lol
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones I'm so totally not replying to 54 individual bullet points lol. But I'll do some. Like wtf are these? These are legit part of why I voted for him. He has a vast amount of experience, he's level-headed NOT prone to doing shit for clicks, he won't be chaotic, etc.
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones And most of these things are just random quotes or opinions from OP with no links to where they came from. How am I supposed to know the context for any of this shit?? This is part of why Becerra won. Steyer's offense was so disconnected & confusing.
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones Yes, I know it may be hard to understand but I have actual things that I'm doing irl. Not just sitting on the internet 24/7. Sorry for making you wait 15 mins for a response! LOL
@KawasakiRoo@seastersjones Oh, I'm totally fine with Becerra becoming governor. I voted for him proudly. What's funny is the fact Steyer supporterss whine about "corporate donors" but flock to a 70 year old billionaire who hasn't considered helping people until it sounded like a good campaign promise.
@seastersjones@KawasakiRoo Then why did Steyer spent tens of millions of dollars only attacking Becerra instead of using those millions to run ads throughout the state attacking Hilton? Becerra spent most of his time & ads attacking the republicans. He wanted dem vs. dem. Steyer want himself vs. Hilton.
@KawasakiRoo This is probably the funniest argument to come out of the Becerra vs. Steyer discourse. If corporate money = billionaires looking out for their own companies ie. their power & wealth. THEN billionaire Steyer spending 1/2 a billion on campaigning to win himself power is 10x worse.
@jakefromgeorgia Exactly. They have the most insane double standards. We’re always supposed to help them and their stupid candidates, but they never have to help or support ours.