Helen Andrews made a bold point:
The more women dominate the legal system, the more justice risks becoming emotional storytelling and compassion theater instead of cold, neutral due process.
She points to Title IX campus courts and some MeToo cases where feelings and narratives often overrode evidence and procedure.
This is a sensitive but important conversation about how demographic shifts quietly reshape institutions. When emotion and group protection replace impartial rules, the rule of law weakens, and public safety eventually pays the price.
Do you think the growing feminization of law and other institutions is changing how justice is applied?
'I HAVE NO BRE*STS'
Watch @ChloeCole's eye-opening testimony to @GOPHELP.
"I hadn't even had my first kiss," she said. "How could they take away part of my womanhood before I was old enough to call myself one?"
"I have no bre*sts, because they were replaced with scars."
"Women's opinions on politics are kindergarten extrapolated to a national scale. Young women are socialists because thats what you would do with crayons and three year olds. Teach them to share."
Based and Schopenhauer pilled
Around 1,950 years ago in Pompeii, a weaver named Successus fell in love with a barmaid named Iris.
She did not love him back.
We know this because his rival, a man named Severus, decided to humiliate him publicly. He grabbed something sharp and carved this into a wall for the whole city to read:
"Successus the weaver loves the innkeeper's slave girl named Iris. She does not care about him at all. But he begs her to have pity on him. His rival wrote this. Goodbye."
Imagine walking to work and seeing that with your name on it.
Successus found it. And instead of letting it go, he carved his reply directly underneath:
"Envious one, why do you get in the way? Yield to a man who is better looking and being treated very unfairly."
Severus came back one more time to end it:
"I have spoken. I have written. You love Iris, but she does not love you."
Then, in 79 AD, Vesuvius erupted and buried the wall, the tavern, and the entire argument under 20 feet of ash. The thread was frozen mid-beef for almost two millennia until archaeologists dug it up and translated it.
We will never know who got the girl. We do not even know if any of the three survived.
Pompeii has over 11,000 of these inscriptions. Bar reviews. Bragging. Bad poetry. A bakery wall that says "Welcome, hungry people." Two guys fighting over a girl in the comments.
The technology changes. We do not.
As someone who has been in the space for nearly a decade, I'm not sure Bitcoin recovers this time.
I had huge conviction in it all those years ago, but now it feels like Saylor and Trump have poisoned the well.
You're certainly not early anymore, and I'm not saying it'll never go up again, just that there are better opportunities out there in general.
I am pivoting to trading commodity futures full time and posting memes.
Bitcoin has lost all the narratives.
Electronic Cash? No.
Gold? No.
Store of Value? No.
Wartime asset? No.
Programmable money? No.
Quantum Resistance plan? No.
Inflation hedge? Not really & the security budget issue is looming...
What's left?
Modern history frames the American Founders' hypocrisy on slavery as the ultimate proof that their ideals were a lie. But Coleman Hughes argues the exact opposite. Writing "all men are created equal" while owning slaves wasn't America's fatal flaw.
To be a hypocrite, you first have to state a moral standard.
Most historical empires avoided this problem entirely. Hughes notes that Ottoman sultans could simply point to texts legalizing slavery. No clash of values meant no internal pressure to change.
America put itself in a moral corner. By putting equality on paper, the Founders gave abolitionists a weapon. They created a cognitive dissonance that eventually forced a resolution.
This defines the current debate over American history.
The 1619 Project looks at the founding hypocrisy and declares the system structurally condemned.
Martin Luther King Jr. looked at the exact same hypocrisy and saw a promissory note waiting to be cashed.
You cannot hold a society accountable to a standard that does not exist. The founding ideals did not excuse the system. They gave future generations the exact leverage needed to break it.
Source: @JTLonsdale@coldxman
Trump has won this war 7 times.
He’s negotiated a peace settlement 12 times.
And he’s opened the Strait of Hormuz at least 4 times.
What more do you want from him?
There is something seriously wrong in Europe and the media is trying to downplay it.
This is Alban Gervaise. He was the father of three young children and worked as a doctor, specialising in radiology in Marseille.
On May 10, 2022, Alban was sitting in his car outside a Catholic school, waiting to pick up his 3 and 7 year old children. He had his 20 month old daughter in the car with him.
Mohamed L (aged 23) jumped into the passenger seat and started stabbing Alban, shouting Allahu Akbar simultaneously.
Alban tried to defend himself and his daughter and jumped out of the car to draw the attacker away from the child. Mohamed L pursued him, shouting “Let me finish him, in the name of God” and stabbed him 10 times in the throat, neck and hear, so vigorously that the blade of the knife snapped.
Passersby rushed to intervene and eventually restrained the attacker.
Sadly, Alban was too seriously injured and died 16 days later, aged 40.
At the time of the attack, Mohamed L was already known to the police for trafficking narcotics. Not exactly a choir boy.
You would have believed that Mohamed L would be imprisoned for life for taking the life of a decorated military doctor in front of his 20 month old daughter.
Alas, no.
In June 2025, a court found it to be a homicide but for Mohamed L to be penally irresponsible because he was suffering from an “acute delusional episode” at the time. He was referred to a hospital for treatment instead.
And it gets worse. Much worse.
This month, just 4 years after the murder, Mohamed L’s full hospitalisation is ending and he is being transferred to a day hospital. He will go home each night and during the weekends and in due course will be completely released into the community.
As you can imagine, Alban’s wife is furious and has been begging the court to reconsider the ruling but they refuse to do so. She does not want another family to face the suffering that her family has experienced.
The Barbie movie was unintendedly right-wing.
All the scenes that apparently show "patriarchy" are just dudes having an awesome time, with both men and women having fun.
The matriachy depicted in the film is just complaining and moral hectoring.