Con

An extraordinary guy can never have an ordinary day

[Con @con12222]

There are two rules in life:

1. Never give out all the information

[CorkCity1185 @1185City]

Kenny Dalglish asked The Sun newspaper to tell the truth about Hillsborough & told them to F*ck Off when they wouldn't. King Kenny stood bravely against Maggie Thatcher & her cronies in the aftermath of the Hillsborough disaster. Liverpool FC

[𝗕𝗼𝗯𝗯𝘆™ @bobby_role]

James Milner has retired from football.

Let's take a look at his funniest tweets 😂 🧵

[The 44 ⚽️ @The_Forty_Four]

Seriously don’t think we will ever peak to this level again…

[Logan ✈️ 🔜 EF 30 @Logan_Derg]

@The_Forty_Four I present 2010 walkers world cup flavours

[Michael Reid @michael_reid11]

In 2026, Liverpool have 0 wins in 9 Premier League games in which Mo Salah hasn't started.

Six points from a possible 27.

In all comps, it's 1 win in 12 without Salah starting this year - that win was against Barnsley in January.

They've won 12/17 when Salah has started.

[Free Talk Live @FreeTalkLive]

You have every right to know what your government is doing, and they have no right to know what you are doing.

That is why they are called public servants and we are called private citizens.

Instead, the relationship has been inverted. The state hides behind secrecy, classified files, and redactions while demanding total visibility into your finances, communications, movement, and behavior.

A society where the rulers live in privacy while the population lives under surveillance is the very definition of tyranny.

[Scott Lewis @WarriorSpeech28]

Once digital ID is fully installed and linked to everything, your bank, your phone, your benefits, your travel, the game changes for good.

They’ll track every transaction, every post, every mile you drive, social credit kicks in, step out of line and the score drops, no more opinions, no more questioning the boats or the bills or the green religion.

The system already knows what you’re thinking before you type it and that’ll hit every single one of you the same, left or right, you’re all going to hate it.

Doesn’t matter who you voted for when your card gets declined because you shared the wrong clip, when your kids can’t get school meals because your score’s too low, when you can’t fill the car or heat the house the rage will be universal.

They’re rushing this exact tool right now, while the country’s already fracturing and the old way was expensive, hypothetically if they arrest you for a tweet today, you got courts, judges, lawyers, the whole slow circus.

It’s costly and it’s messy, after digital ID, they don’t need any of that, you step out of line and they simply cut the switch, no money, no services, no access, you’re already in the prison.

You’ll have to starve quietly, comply or disappear from society without a single policeman leaving the station.

[Adam Brooks AKA EssexPR 🇬🇧 @EssexPR]

No one voted for DIGITAL ID - no one.
They have NO mandate for this. It wasn’t in their manifesto.
MILLIONS showed their feelings on a Government petition.

Expect protests. Big protests…

[Second Tier podcast @secondtierpod]

“Hey Siri, show me infinite aura”

[Nick Dearden @nickdearden75]

Just three UK data centres will account for more than 1% of the UK’s carbon budget by 2033. It’s like building several international airports. No wonder they’re lying about it. We’ve got to stop this madness.

https://t.co/XPLPxXPVGl

[𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉 @OrevaZSN]

AI could disappear tomorrow, and nothing would change for any of us, except that life would progressively get better and better from that point on.

[𐌁𐌉Ᏽ 𐌕𐌉𐌌𐌉 @OrevaZSN]

Humanity thrived for thousands of years without AI. We can live without it. What we cannot live without is fresh water, farmers, agriculture, and land.
Stop supporting AI. It’s destroying our planet.

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

The state pension is not a random government favour, it’s the back end of a 35–40 year compulsory “contract” where people are forced to hand over National Insurance on the clear promise of a basic pension at the end.

Politicians and think tanks helped design an unfunded, pay‑as‑you‑go system where today’s workers pay today’s pensioners, then have the gall to call it “unsustainable” as if the public dreamt it up.

If a private firm sold you a retirement product on fixed terms, took your money for four decades, then announced at 66 that you “didn’t really need it” and would henceforth be means‑tested or frozen, they would be in court for mis‑selling and fraud.

The crisis here is not pensioners “leeching off the young”, it’s a political class that built a Ponzi‑style NI system, diverted the proceeds for other spending, and now wants to default on the people who kept their side of the bargain.

You do not blame the victims of a defective product for believing the brochure; you go after the people who wrote it.

[Melissa Ciummei @KSCUBKEE]

Digital id consultation..Act Now: This Isn’t a Real Consultation….It’s Already Decided‼️‼️

This is being sold as your chance to have a say, but it doesn’t feel like one. The big decision - bringing in digital ID -looks like it’s already been made. What they’re asking now is just how it should work, not whether it should happen at all.

On top of that, it’s not easy to take part. You’re expected to read through loads of technical material just to answer basic questions. Most people don’t have the time or background for that….and that’s the point. It keeps real public input to a minimum.

You don’t need to fill in the whole thing to push back. Even one clear objection matters. Use the prompts below, tweak them if you want, and get something submitted before the deadline.

Bullet Point Prompt for ChatGPT

* Write a formal consultation response opposing a UK digital ID proposal
* Base the response on the UK Government Consultation Principles
* Include the quote: “Consultations should take place when there is scope to influence the outcome”
* Argue that the consultation focuses on how digital ID is implemented, not whether it should be implemented at all
* State that this suggests the decision has already been made
* Include the quote: “Be clear about the scope of the consultation and what decisions are yet to be taken”
* Argue that the consultation does not clearly show that key decisions are still open
* Include the quote: “Be accessible and use plain English to encourage participation from a wide audience”
* Add that the consultation requires hours of reading and a high level of technical understanding, creating a barrier for ordinary people
* Argue that this makes it inaccessible and excludes meaningful public participation
* Include a section explaining opposition to digital ID, covering:
* Privacy and surveillance concerns
* Risk of function creep
* Risk of exclusion or coercion (becoming mandatory in practice)
* Data security risks
* Increased power for government and large corporations
* Keep the tone formal, clear, and assertive
* Conclude by stating opposition to both the consultation process and the policy itself.

[matrixbot @thematrixb0t]

The real reason for the WEF's obsession with digital IDs and CBDCs.

"The biggest fear that the World Economic Forum has is that there are going to be people that will not comply."

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

2026
“Digital ID is really convenient.”

2030
“Why won’t my money work?”