Connie Calvisi

UTS Master of Pharmacy Student

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

@AustraliaPs5 Got one thank you!

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Second week of virtual placement is off to a good start 💪🏼 #virtualplacement2017 @TsingosLucas @Ben_jamin_Casey @benseaman92 @haneen_alkhthir @kayla_a_c

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q10. It's valuable in the sense that it identifies better ways in which to evaluate SDM and gives insight into patient perspective #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q9. Yes! The discussion section states the findings in both the questionnaires and interviews. The conclusion also sums it up nicely #UTSEBP

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q8. Yes (iknownothingaboutstatistics) #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q7. I don't think so #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q6. Yes I think it was adequately considered as they mentioned the measures they took to reduce interview bias #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q5. It was but I think SDM should've been explained to the patients so the answers to the surveys/ interviews could be more directed #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q4. Kind of. It would've been better if they selected a more diverse group of participants #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q3. Initially seemed like it was, but there was a lot of confusion in patient responses to the survey/interviews so probs not #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q2. I think it was as it assessed both qualitative and quantitative data. Also, more is always better #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q1. Yep! to explore patients' decision making preferences and to investigate important facilitators and barriers among patients #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

#utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q10. Absolutely! Benefits outweighed the costs by a long shot #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q10. Yes I think all clinically important outcomes were considered (LDL-C and secondary end points) #utsebp

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q9. Yes and no. No because the population were picked from a slightly skewed demographic #UTSEBP

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q8. 95% precision for treatment effect #UTSEBP

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q7a. Kindly refer to table 2 #UTSEBP

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

Q7. Treatment effect varied but secondary outcomes were more significant that primary ones #UTSEBP

[Connie Calvisi @ConnieCalvisi]

6. Yes groups were treated equally (apart from intervention) #utsebp