@mangarone23@ABsteward@DrToddLee@DrEmilyMcD Neat read. NI margin is huge and the rationale for NI design is questionable. I had higher hopes for FMT up front. Perhaps vanco then FMT is where the money is at.
@ABsteward@OFIDJournal I feel like it's important to consider what is driving the hypotension: hypovolemia, that rapidly corrects with fluids, vs more distributive. The latter likely indicating a worse prognosis. Unclear if CDI that rapidly improves with fluids should be labelled/treated as fulminant.
@DrToddLee@ABsteward A subgroup analysis of patients meeting IDSA clinical criteria (new unexplained >3 unformed stools/<24h) for CDI would have been nice. I think this is the question when deciding to treat or not to treat NAAT+/Toxin- patients.
@DrToddLee@ABsteward Not really any data we could use. No comparative mortality data. Recurrence is somewhat captured by conversion to Toxin+, but there's no comment on clinical criteria and this misses Toxin- recurrences. Indeed, the only colectomy attributable to CDI was NAAT+/Toxin-.
@ABsteward@realandyrosser@DrToddLee@DrEmilyMcD We did a subgroup of HIV-negative patients and the cut-off of 80 could still exclude PCP (NPV >95%) at a pre-test probability below 20%, which was similar to the overall analysis.
@onlykirankk@ABsteward From 80-400 the BDG test is indeterminate and can neither rule in nor rule out PCP (i.e., PPV and NPV both <90% across most pre-test probabilities) and alternative PCP diagnostic tests should be pursued
🌍📝Participate in our 10-min anonymous international surveys on C. difficile. Open to clinicians who managed ≥3 adult cases in a year. Share your expertise!
📝https://t.co/QecdfrZaid
#IDtwitter#MedTwitter#cdiff#IDWeek2024#InfectiousDiseases