The 23-member 9/11 Consensus Panel offers peer-reviewed statements, based on expert independent opinion, of best evidence opposing the official 9/11 story.
The official story of the failed air defenses on 9/11 was changed three times. Military propagandist Miles Kara was behind several of the accounts.
https://t.co/mZBAWBExnI
This chapter of Graeme MacQueen’s book, The 2001 Anthrax Deception, explains why the Bush administration and PNAC wanted to avoid using the term “crimes��� to describe the 9/11 attacks. https://t.co/68ykU1C51l
Grassroots movements are typically shut down through infiltration and use of proven techniques of disruption. Here are some of the techniques that have been used to disrupt 9/11 questioning. https://t.co/M8HqYP5ro3
In this peer reviewed paper, a team of physicists and chemists provide evidence for extremely high temperatures at the WTC that cannot be explained by burning jet fuel or office furnishings. It concludes that highly exothermic chemical reactions occurred. https://t.co/ujjvqhs3KR
🚨 The OPCW Has Finally Admitted The Cover-Up Designed To Push The US-Backed Syria Hoax! 🚨
Imagine living in a world where a country could commit a false flag, use it to completely destroy an entire country, bring down their government, kill millions of innocent people, and sink the survivors into gut-wrenching poverty — and then when the truth about the false flag finally comes out, no one cares.
Man, that would suck to live in that world.
Well, we live there right now.
Thanks to a recent lawsuit, we finally have the admission of a cover-up by the OPCW related to the false flag chemical attacks used to justify the Western annihilation of Syria. I know. I know. Humans now have the memory of a goldfish and therefore something that happened a few years ago doesn’t matter anymore and possibly doesn’t even count as real.
But let me just try for a second to explain how important this is.
The US, Britain and Israel wanted a reason to collapse Syria. (The real reason had to do with protecting Israel and dollar hegemony, but that’s not important right now. Focus!) The West had already funded, armed, and facilitated the totally organic “civil war” in Syria, but they needed to justify massive sanctions (economic war) and other full-frontal attacks on Assad’s government, including stealing the third of the country that had 90% of the gas fields. They concocted the idea of a “red line” in relation to the use of chemical weapons as a way to get that justification.
And then — what do you know — Assad soon decided to use chemical weapons! What great luck! If we made that red line and he didn’t cross it, then it wouldn’t have served any purpose at all! Thank goodness he did.
One of the largest examples of the crossing of the red line was in Douma, Syria, where a supposed chlorine attack killed dozens of people. The world-renowned Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons parachuted in to investigate. Everything seemed to be going perfectly according to the American / Israeli plan to destroy Syria.
[SIDE NOTE: This column has a lot of links, sources, and images that go with it. So please read this column (at no cost) at "RealLeeCamp" on subs tack. And click subscribe. Thanks!]
But then a problem reared its ugly head. The OPCW investigators on the Fact Finding Mission were real, genuine professionals. (Oh crap.) They actually did the thing they were trained to do. They analyzed the scene incredibly carefully and found that, no, it was not a chlorine attack. As best they could discern, somebody had worked very hard to make it look like a chlorine attack (and probably killed a bunch of people in that effort).
Here’s a tiny list of just a few of the problems with the staged scene in Douma:
There were two very large chlorine canisters that had apparently been dropped from a helicopter onto the building. One had crashed through the roof and landed inside. But neither of the canisters had the appropriate dents/scratches as if they had been dropped by a helicopter. Even very strong canisters would have massive dents from the impact.
The canister that was inside the building couldn’t actually have fit through the hole in the roof it supposedly came through. And it couldn’t have actually landed inside the room and bounced onto the bed the way it supposedly had.
The dead bodies inside the building moved. …Yes, you read that right. …They moved. For example some photos show a dead infant laying on the floor and then others show the infant in the dead mother’s arms. Unless you believe these are zombies, it means during the photographing of the scene someone was manipulating the bodies to make them look sadder or more realistic. Yes, this is horrific. You know what’s even more horrific? Using these innocent people to justify murdering millions and destroying Syria.
In a chlorine attack, victims can smell a strong scent of chlorine before they die. This means that any normal human would try to leave the area because they can tell they are being gassed. Yet the bodies show that no one tried to get to the open windows or doors.
There were also dead bodies in the basement of the building. One problem — the basement had no door or window connecting to the main building. The only door went out to the street. This means the chlorine gas from the upper floors would’ve had to exit the building, take a stroll along the sidewalk, and then go through the door to the basement to kill more people down there. (The idea of sentient chlorine gas that chases you is truly terrifying.)
Some of the bodies had foaming at the mouth — a symptom of a nerve gas attack, not a chlorine attack.
Anyway, you get the point. That’s just a small sampling of what was wrong with the scene.
So the actual professionals in the Fact Finding Mission then came back home to OPCW headquarters in the Netherlands. They took one more step just to be sure. They reached out to expert German military toxicologists to confirm their analysis that the scene was fake. And sure enough, the toxicologists came back with the same understanding — The Douma horror show was not a legitimate chlorine attack.
So the OPCW investigators then gave their report. But the top brass at the OPCW didn’t like what they heard. Apparently the US and Israel really needed their false flag. The top brass went on to alter the report and cover up the German analysis as if that analysis never happened. And until just the other day, the OPCW denied that cover-up at every opportunity.
But thanks to a lawsuit by Dr. Brendan Whelan reported on by Aaron Mate:
“For the first time in a prolonged cover-up scandal, the world’s top chemical watchdog has acknowledged censoring a finding that undermined allegations of a toxic gas attack by the former Syrian government.”
That’s right. They’ve been forced to admit it — A massive cover-up to back up a false flag to allow the US, Israel and Britain to collapse a country and murder millions in the process.
Of course, if you know not to trust mainstream corporate media, then you probably found out about this cover-up years ago. It’s not new. But what’s new is the admission. Those of us who have been covering this have been either ignored or maligned. Some of us have had our social media accounts banned or suppressed. But now we’ve been proven right — yet again.
[NOTE: This column has a lot of links, sources, and images that go with it. So please read this column (at no cost) at "RealLeeCamp" on subs tack. And click subscribe. Thanks!]
Dr MacQueen received his PhD from Harvard and then spent his life working for peace in war zones and at the Centre for Peace Studies at McMaster University. Here are his final words on the subject. https://t.co/v2FLZ2ObnF
At the FAA, two men stood out in the failure to defend the skies on 9/11. One was a Wall Street lawyer at his first day on the job, and the other was a U.S. Special Ops commander never held responsible for his failed role or even questioned about it.
https://t.co/R4WPiQuZPJ
Here’s an excellent analysis of TV network coverage on 9/11 and the efforts to suppress comments about explosive demolition. It’s the second of two parts from Graeme MacQueen and @TedFWalter. https://t.co/jwKgI0cvBe
After 9/11, The Independent, the London Telegraph and the BBC all reported that the hijackers were still alive. The Telegraph said it had interviewed some of them and they had the same names, dates of birth, places of birth, and occupations as the accused. https://t.co/SggIJMkUH8
Graeme MacQueen authored this review of the oral histories related to the destruction of the WTC. He demonstrates that a lot of witnesses perceived explosions that brought down the Towers. https://t.co/fXZ6o2Zt8X
Jeffrey Sachs on the real origins of the Iran war, and the coming economic devastation.
(0:00) Where Does the Iran War Go From Here?
(10:13) Iran’s Growing Power Since the War Began
(14:37) Where Does the Hatred Towards Iran Come From?
(24:37) The Nuclear Weapon Lie Surrounding Iran
(32:51) The Greater Israel Project
(37:36) Trump’s Beholdenness to the Oil and Zionist Lobby
(41:12) Iran’s Drought, Israel’s Use of the U.S., and Accepting a Stronger Iran
(54:54) Sachs’s Exchange with Danny Danon
(1:01:37) David Ben-Gurion and the Displacement of Millions of Jews
(1:07:28) Zionism’s Origin
(1:17:06) What Will Israel Do If the U.S. Withdraws Support?
(1:24:38) The Untenability of the Greater Israel Project
(1:32:35) What Are the Economic Effects if This War Accelerates?
(1:47:17) Is This Preordained?
(1:57:07) Have Any Legislatures Grown More Powerful in the Past Decade?
(1:58:23) Will Our Current System Survive This?
“HOW DARE YOU SPEAK
LIKE THIS”
-Tucker Carlson to Donald Trump
One of the most prominent right-wing voices has broken away from Trump, directly criticising him.
John Kiriakou says going back to the 80’s everytime an Israeli prime minister would come to the White House they would ask the American president to bomb Iran. All said no, except Trump.
[RG911Team] The US government has a track record of covering up explosions that killed Americans.
Just look at the research of Dr. David Ray Griffin, who documented the dozens of 9/11 first responders who reported explosions in the World Trade Center.
From his 2006 article “Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in the 9/11 Oral Histories” ⬇️
“There was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”
–Firefighter Richard Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know like when they demolish a building?”
–Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on certain floors and then you hear ‘Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop’.”
–Paramedic Daniel Rivera
The above quotations come from a collection of 9/11 oral histories that, although recorded by the Fire Department of New York (FDNY) at the end of 2001, were publicly released only on August 12, 2005. Prior to that date, very few Americans knew the content of these accounts or even the fact that they existed.
Why have we not known about them until recently? Part of the answer is that the city of New York would not release them until it was forced to do so. Early in 2002, the New York Times requested copies under the freedom of information act, but Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s administration refused. So the Times, joined by several families of 9/11 victims, filed suit. After a long process, the city was finally ordered by the New York Court of Appeals to release the records (with some exceptions and redactions allowed). Included were oral histories, in interview form, provided by 503 firefighters and medical workers.
1)Emergency Medical Services had become a division within the Fire Department.
2) The Times then made these oral histories publicly available.
3) Once the content of these testimonies is examined, it is easy to see why persons concerned to protect the official story about 9/11 would try to keep them hidden.
By suggesting that explosions were occurring in the World Trade Center’s Twin Towers, they pose a challenge to the official account of 9/11, according to which the towers were caused to collapse solely by the impact of the airplanes and the resulting fires.
In any case, now that the oral histories have finally been released, it is time for Americans and the world in general to see what these brave men and women reported about that fateful day. If this information forces a reevaluation of the official story about 9/11, better now than later.
That said, it must be added that although these oral histories are of great significance, they do not contain the first reports of explosions in the Twin Towers. Such reports–from firefighters, reporters, and people who had worked in the towers—started becoming available right after 9/11.
These reports, however, were not widely publicized by the mainstream press and, as a result, have for the most part been known only within the “9/11 truth movement,” which has focused on evidence that seems inconsistent with the official story.
———-
Read the whole article in the link in the comment below ⬇️