"Decided by social consensus" doesn't tell you WHY a decision was made.
A consensus mechanism creates incentives which influence decision making.
If a "social consensus" changes a consensus mechanism, it means the consensus broke, because OTHER incentives prevailed.
@Haeze@FreesoulFaizan@RupertLowe10 Same for data then. People don’t even understand per capita. And while stories just “happen”, data is gathered which brings a lot of opportunities to manufacture narratives
@Haeze@FreesoulFaizan@RupertLowe10 Sure but data can be cooked many ways. Where I’m from, immigrant data was not updated for some time and in a couple of months 1M “new” immigrants showed up on the books.
Also most people don’t read the data sources and can be fed poor/convenient interpretations.
That’s debatable tho. Anti-immigration people argue exactly that.
Denmark is one of the few countries that reports crime by background and results align with their view (also a country with less far right extremists because immigration is under control).
In my opinion people should also look to *direction* of data not just wait to “it’s official we have a problem”
@Haeze@FreesoulFaizan@RupertLowe10 How about the rape gangs? Henry Novak? The machete girl?
If there were just ONE opposite crime, it would be hell on earth
@neilorpen@SlainByTheWire@GBNEWS@joerichlaw You can’t prove a negative. The only way to say “I’m not a kid” is by showing you are an adult.
The only way to prove you are an adult is everyone showing ID to use a big part of the Internet
@HodlMagoo Not so much for the economics but for how much they destroyed culture.
They are basically accepted shitcoins, they are tokenomics on bitcoin.
We had a takedown request from Munich court for a nos_tr post accessed via njump. Being that the event is pulled locally from relays by the event ID passed in the url, I dont think we will comply. It's like blaming a browser for the website you accessed. Happy to go the distance.