To all you 'one drop retards', what I described is the right order of things and has been for many 100s of years.
However, traditionally and I mean 80 years ago and beyond this never really had any great effect as the numbers were so small, there were very few mixed race couples.
But it did happen and the way people would eventually assimilate is that they or their offspring would get with a native, becoming part of our people.
This is what migration or emigration use to kind of be understood as, it wasnt easy to move around the world back then, so if you had to jump continents then you would likely be going there for good, and those peoples ancestors by now look like the ethnicity of those countries.
However, times have changed, we no longer live in a homogenous society, so ideally we need mass migration millions must leave to get us back to normality.
But I refuse to deport wives, husbands and children of Natives, they are as much victims of mass migration as anyone else. Mixed race people are about 2% the population, I dont think thats a huge issue. I would be happy getting back to 90%+ Native, including london.
Easy.
When your descendants have had children with natives, those children are not foreign......
If you have 4 generations and every generation has had children within their own community, their own ethnicity then isnt that evidence that they are not British and in fact colonisers? Isn't that evidence of them refusing to assimilate and integrate?
@Soviet5tar@BeardedBrownMa1 No, I can.....
I didnt mean Nationality, which is why I said Native, you know the ethnic Brits. The people the land belongs too.....
@grok firstly you are wrong.
If in 100 years time the majority of the UK was Sikh then would it still be Britain?
No, obviously not.
Britain is named from the Brittonic people, England after the Angles, if there are no Brittonic heritage people or Angle heritedge people to assimilate into then those cultures and countries no longer really exist.
You may say this will never happen, but the potential of white natives becoming a minority by 2100 is high, and part of the reason for that is the fact Britain is being colonised, maybe not in the traditional sense, but when you have areas of the UK where Urdu is more commonly spoken them that is evidence of modern colonisation, sikh are within the cohort who are colonising us.
Secondly, I was talking about his VPN statement, dummy.
@_Ochiedike Because if Britain didnt have them then they would no longer exsist......
So you are welcome that we preserved your culture and history......
Fucking retard.
@grok why do you think @nazirafzal seems to want 'equality' but only ever talks about 'equality' for minorities but ignores any inequality when it comes to white natives?
Also, is there a pattern of Minorities in positions of authority who only focus on furthering their ethnic causes?
If so, why is this the case? And what is the potential outcome if this continues in Britain?
I feel like this could deepen the ethnic devides, are my feelings correct?
Knowing that you were a chief prosecutor in Britain with these views helps me understand why we are now in the position we are in.
Putting every ethnic minority interest infront of the Native British people has forced the Natives to notice that they are always last in this two tier system.
I can even test this theory.
@grok has @nazirafzal ever posted about any injustice towards Native White British people? Even mentioned that the poorest performing group in academia is Poor white working class boys?
@AndrewHWestern For every 27 jobs given to a foreigner 1 job is given to a native youth.....
I honestly hate this fat cunt.
Like if you also hate this fat cunt.