Coolonzo 𐤊

[IzioDev @IzioDev]

The Toccata upgrade guide has been updated to clarify what each network actor needs to do.

Required changes:
https://t.co/8FSiDJDosa

[Coolonzo 𐤊 @Coolonzo]

@aschwartmann @JoanaCotar Wie kann einem eine Person etwas bedeuten, die D an die Wand gefahren hat?!

[Coolonzo 𐤊 @Coolonzo]

@JoanaCotar Ich bin sprach- und fassungslos, ehrlich gesagt. D im Endstadium.

[Daniel_Kaspa @Daniel_Kaspa_KR]

Michael Sutton just dropped one of the most important threads since Toccata.

This isn't about chess.

It's about a new way to think about computation.

While most chains keep pushing larger monolithic smart contracts, Kaspa is exploring a different path:

➡️ Multi-Contract State Machines
➡️ Decomposable Computation
➡️ Parallel Execution
➡️ Prunable State
➡️ High-Frequency DAG Settlement
Small contracts.
Massive scale.
The long-term vision is becoming clearer:
Kaspa isn't trying to be a faster Ethereum.
It's building a fundamentally different computing model.

From Silverscript → Argent → End-to-End Applications.
The future may belong to systems that split computation into many small pieces, execute them in parallel, and converge rapidly on a high-speed DAG.

Read the thread carefully.

You're looking at the early blueprint of Kaspa's native smart contract ecosystem.

kaspa:native #Kaspa 🚀🔥

[Crypto Matt ꓘ @cryptomatt1983]

Amazing Kaspa video! $KAS

https://t.co/xVb44ZB7vB

[Eric 𐤊 @Crypto_FTO]

$ETH holders: Time to rotate into $KAS. Here's why:

1. Speed kills. Kaspa runs 10 blocks per second (aiming for 100) with instant confirmations. ETH still crawls compared to that raw throughput. No more gas wars or waiting games.

2. True scalability without compromises. BlockDAG tech processes blocks in parallel not linear like ETH. This is Nakamoto consensus on steroids: decentralized, secure PoW, and hyper-scalable.

3. Massive upside asymmetry. Kaspa's market cap sits around ~$800M. ETH is over $200B. If KAS captures even a fraction of ETH's narrative, 10-50x is on the table. History rhymes.

4. Toccata hardfork is imminent (June 2026). Native tokens, covenants, ZK opcodes, SilverScript programmability turning Kaspa into a full programmable L1 while keeping blazing speed. This is ETH's 2017 smart contract moment.

5. Fair launch purity. No VC bags, no premine, no bullshit. Every KAS mined. Real PoW security vs. ETH's staked validator risks and centralization concerns.

6. Fees stay dirt cheap. High throughput = low costs forever. Perfect for DeFi, payments, NFTs, and mass adoption where ETH still bleeds users on gas.

7. Beta play in a bull market. Capital rotates from blue-chips to high-conviction tech like this. Kaspa is the fastest, purest PoW scaler out there.ETH was the king of smart contracts. Kaspa is building the king of performance with programmability incoming.Rotate before Toccata hits. $KAS is loading.

What are you waiting for?

[Dr Martin Hiesboeck @MHiesboeck]

The Architectural Edge: Why Kaspa Outpaces Ethereum for DEX Infrastructure

Building a Decentralized Exchange (DEX) on a traditional single-chain blockchain like Ethereum is like trying to run a high-frequency trading firm on a narrow, one-lane highway. While Ethereum pioneered automated market makers (AMMs), its sequential design forces every transaction to wait in a single queue.

Kaspa’s BlockDAG architecture—complemented by the Toccata hard fork—rebuilds the Layer 1 foundation to handle the intensive demands of decentralized trading natively. Kaspa offers several architectural advantages that make it a superior backbone for a modern DEX compared to Ethereum.

Parallel Processing vs. Sequential Bottlenecks

Ethereum processes transactions sequentially. One block is added at a time, roughly every 12 seconds. When thousands of traders rush to swap assets during market volatility, the network bottlenecks, causing a massive surge in gas fees.

Kaspa replaces the single blockchain with a Directed Acyclic Graph (**BlockDAG**). Using the GHOSTDAG protocol, the network processes multiple blocks **in parallel** simultaneously (~10 blocks per second on mainnet). For a DEX, this means transactions don’t get jammed in a single queue; trades are woven together concurrently without degrading network performance.

Structural Defense Against Predatory MEV

Because Ethereum relies on a public mempool where a single block producer dictates the exact sequential order of transactions every 12 seconds, **Maximal Extractable Value (MEV)** bots thrive. They spot a pending trade and "sandwich" the user—buying right before them and selling right after—forcing the trader to execute at a worse price.

Kaspa's Advantage: Real-time decentralization dismantles the mechanics of MEV bots. With Kaspa producing blocks at a rapid-fire pace, there is no single consensus leader holding a monopoly over transaction ordering for long intervals. Rapid parallel block creation and real-time sequencing make it virtually impossible for bots to accurately predict the state and insert predatory sandwich attacks. Traders get the exact execution price they expect.

Sub-Second Latency (CEX Speed, DEX Security)

Waiting 12 seconds for a block—and minutes for true finality—is a lifetime in live trading. While Layer 2 rollups speed up execution, they fragment liquidity, introduce bridge vulnerabilities, and complicate the user experience.

Driven by the Rusty Kaspa engine, the network features sub-second block times. After just 10 seconds, a trade has accumulated roughly 10 layers of confirmation deep within the DAG structure. A DEX on Kaspa delivers the instant, responsive user experience of a Centralized Exchange (CEX) while settling entirely on an ultra-secure, decentralized Layer 1.
.
Predictable, Sub-Cent Transaction Fees

High traffic turns Ethereum into a playground for whales, where a simple token swap can easily cost $20 to $100+ in gas fees.

Because Kaspa scales horizontally at the base layer rather than relying on vertical scaling, the throughput handles massive volume natively. Transaction fees remain consistently sub-cent (<$0.01), making micro-swaps and algorithmic high-frequency trading economically viable for retail users.

[Michael Sutton @michaelsuttonil]

@Kaspa_Girl it really is all about C L A R I T Y

[Cade O'Neill @CadeONeill]

$KAS Kaspa might become the digital silver🥈

How❔
👉Through TOCCATA HARD FORK

● Timeline and Importance 👇
• The Toccata Hard Fork activation window is between June 5th and 20th / targeted June 30th, 2026).
• This upgrade transforms $KAS from the world’s fastest PoW payments chain into a fully programmable Layer1.

● What’s coming with Toccata 👇
• Native KRC-20 tokens on L1
• Covenants + SilverScript for powerful on chain logic (no bloated EVM needed)
• ZK verification opcodes unlocking privacy, DeFi, and advanced apps
• Smart contracts, NFTs, and dApps directly on the base layer at insane speed

👉 While the market is distracted, $KAS is quietly building the infrastructure for the next wave.
Are you accumulating $KAS? 🤔

#Kaspa #KAS #Toccata #BlockDAG #crypto

[Kaspa Silver @KaspaSilver]

Something amazing about @KasSigner is that you can generate your seed phrase and store it in an SD card. That means you never have to write it down. You can back as many SD cards as you want and to add extra protection add a 13th or 25th word passphrase that you keep in your brain.

I am in talks with an auditor to hopefully audit the code. Then next step is to get some Kaspa app to support transaction signing with QR codes. @KurncySolutions @KastleWallet @KaspiumOfficial

I believe moving this forward will give Kaspians the best way to secure their $KAS. No more reliance on name brands to send your Kaspa to cold storage.

[crypto.news @cryptodotnews]

JUST IN: Kaspa hits 2.3 billion total transactions on mainnet

[Dr Martin Hiesboeck @MHiesboeck]

Can’t get more Berlin than that @Igra_Labs @UpholdInc

[Tangem @Tangem]

We hear the Kaspa community and understand why dynamic address support is important. kaspa:native is technically different from Bitcoin-like UTXO networks such as BTC, LTC, DOGE, etc. Its architecture requires a separate implementation approach, so this feature cannot be added in the same way as for other UTXO-based networks.

That’s why dynamic address support is being rolled out step by step. We started with networks where the implementation of this feature is the same, while Kaspa requires additional dedicated work and validation before it can be delivered properly.

Kaspa is a priority and the team is actively working through the technical scope right now. We’re not putting a firm date on it yet because we want to deliver it right, but the Kaspa community hasn’t been forgotten and we’ll come back with concrete timing once it’s confirmed.

[Crypto Tice @CryptoTice_]

BREAKING:

The EU banned cash payments over €10,000.

And will require ID for every Bitcoin transaction starting 2027.

Cash banned above €10,000.
Bitcoin requires ID.
Gold can still be bought anonymously.

While America proposes zero capital gains on Bitcoin.
While UAE builds crypto banks with zero restrictions.

Europe is building a financial surveillance state.
And calling it consumer protection.

2027 is closer than it sounds.

[Australischer Austauschstudent @VceOfReason]

Die ziehen das jetzt ernsthaft eiskalt durch.

Der ÖRR wird nicht über Rupert Lowes Rape Gang Inquiry Report berichten.

Ein 219 Seiten langer Bericht, der die Vergewaltigung von mehr als 250.000 britischen Mädchen über mehrere Jahrzehnte offenlegt, hat in den Augen unserer objektiven Qualitätsjournalisten keine „überregionale Relevanz“.

Hier auf X haben innerhalb eines Tages 43 Millionen Menschen davon erfahren.

Diese Plattform ist buchstäblich das letzte Bollwerk der Meinungsfreiheit.

[Michael Sutton @michaelsuttonil]

prologue

Taking my dr.’s (Sompolinsky) advice to rest a bit and have fun after Toccata’s release, I started experimenting with argent: a small high-level DSL for multi-contract covenant apps that produces silverscript code.

Please don’t laugh at this definition of “rest” ;) Releasing heavy core consensus upgrades carries a massive burden of mainnet responsibility. Playing with language compilers and application structure is exploratory work. So yes, for some ppl, it might genuinely feel like resting.

---

About three months ago, during the development of Toccata and silverscript, Ori (@someone235) threw a quick sentence at me: “You can implement a mechanism similar to MAST using ICC.”

(Stay with us if you want to understand what MAST is and why Ori was only partially right.)

Around that time, I started playing with complex scripts over silverscript and mostly tried to understand what a complex contract system over the new Kaspa script engine/silverscript could look like (or if one could be built at all). One thing led to another and I started trying to develop a chess game over silverscript. “okay codex, let’s start developing chess, let’s start with a chess game with basic movement rules, no complications. An array of 64 cells representing the board, public keys for black/white, turn, movement. The bare minimum that is still sufficiently complex.”

Of course, the first attempt didn’t go so well. As is fitting for a compiler in its early days, I quickly reached a state where I was the first one walking through certain code paths. This triggered a burst of contributions to silverscript itself and/or finding temporary workarounds.

The second attempt got stuck on the boundaries of the script itself. It turns out that implementing all the game rules for every possible piece plus scan loops statically unrolled to 64 iterations is, how should I put it, not really workable and tends to blow up. I came to the conclusion that the logic needed to be shattered into different contracts, meaning different scripts.

But how do you do that within the boundaries of a game? And what if I want to implement a decentralized chess league with players and scores that persist and update over time?

(By the way, chess is a complex and interesting test case for development, but don’t mistakenly think for a second that this discussion is limited to or aimed at games.)

>>

[Coolonzo 𐤊 @Coolonzo]

@a_nnaschneider Hass ist m.E. größtenteils von der Meinungsfreiheit gedeckt. Sie umfasst jedoch nicht u.a. Verleumdung oder falsche Tatsachenbehauptung.

[Yunio 𐤊 @younio1977]

写在 Kaspa 即将迎来重要硬分叉之前。我越来越觉得，Kaspa 即将引入的 SS / Silverscript 原语，不应该被简单理解成“Kaspa 也要做智能合约”。这可能是另一条路。

EVM 和 Solana 的智能合约，虽然技术实现不同，但整体上更接近“全局程序 / 平台应用”模式：先部署一套程序，再让大量用户去调用它。这种模式当然很强。复杂 DeFi、应用平台、通用计算、大型生态组合，都非常适合这种结构。

但它也有一个天然问题：当大量交易反复触碰同一个账户、同一个合约状态、同一个余额时，热点就会出现。

举一个很普通的例子。
一笔 100 元交易：

seller 拿 98
broker 拿 1.8
introducer 拿 0.2

单笔来看，EVM 能做，Solana 也能做。

真正的问题不是“能不能拆账”。真正的问题是：如果这种结算重复一百万次，会在哪里撞墙？在账户制里，broker 和 introducer 往往会反复出现。每一笔交易都要给同一个 broker 余额加钱、给同一个 introducer 余额加钱。

这就像很多人同时去改同一个表格里的同一个数字。规模一大，天然容易排队，天然容易形成热点。而 UTXO 的思路不一样。在 Kaspa SS 这种范式里，一笔交易本身就可以是一个带规则的 UTXO：

输入是 buyer payment。

输出是 seller、broker、introducer 各自的 UTXO。

规则是成交证明、签名、时间条件、oracle 断言等条件满足后，才能按这个路径结算。这里的关键不是“一笔钱能不能拆三份”。

关键是：收钱不是修改一个共享余额，而是生成一个新的独立 UTXO。broker 从一千笔交易里收到的，不是同一个账户数字被加了一千次，而是一千个独立的小 UTXO。这些 UTXO 之间没有共享状态，不抢同一个余额，不锁同一个账户，所以天然更适合并行。

当然，小 UTXO 多了，持有人之后可以自己合并。这就像收到很多零钱后，自己再整理成大钞。但这个合并是持有人自己的异步操作，不会阻塞其他人的交易结算。

所以我认为，Kaspa SS 真正重要的地方，不只是“Kaspa 有智能合约了”。更重要的是：它让大量、分散、局部、可验证的规则结算成为可能。

这和传统智能合约平台的气质很不一样。

EVM 更适合复杂的全局合约系统。Solana 更适合高性能的程序账户模型。

Kaspa SS 可能更适合低成本、高并行、局部化的规则结算流。

尤其是 broker、introducer、oracle、maker、agent 这类角色驱动的经济系统，很多时候并不需要一个巨大的平台合约。

它需要的是：

每一笔经济行为自己带规则；
每一次劳动贡献可以被识别；
每一个参与方可以自动拿到自己的 UTXO；
每一笔结算可以独立发生；
每一个小程序都可以被快速、分散地部署；
每一套规则都可以被直接检查和验证。

这才是我认为 Kaspa SS 最值得关注的地方。

它不是把所有人重新拉进一个巨大的全局应用里。它更像是把“可控程序”布置到一笔笔真实经济行为之中。商品、服务、预测市场、介绍费、撮合费、oracle 验证、agent 协作，都可以变成一条条小型、透明、可组合、可并行的结算规则。这类规则不一定宏大。但它们可以非常多。非常分散。非常低成本。也非常容易被验证。

这可能才是真正去中心化合约的另一种形态：不是一个超级平台控制所有状态，而是一笔笔局部经济行为自己拥有规则，自己完成结算，自己留下可验证的痕迹。这件事的意义，恐怕只有未来才能真正评估。因为它触碰的不是单一应用。而是人类社会最基本的协作模板：

有人提供商品，
有人提供服务，
有人撮合交易，
有人介绍资源，
有人验证质量，
有人承担风险，
……
然后规则自动结算贡献。

如果这些都可以通过 Kaspa 的 UTXO + SS 原语，被低成本、分散、透明地布置出来，那它就不仅仅是智能合约。它更像是一种新的经济结算语言。不是把世界再做成一个平台。而是让一笔笔真实协作，自己拥有规则，自己完成结算。
#Kaspa #kas

[Yunio 𐤊 @younio1977]

@Kwikaspa 是的！KAS，这次升级完成，带来的冲击不仅是巨大的，而且是长远的。不仅仅是快，也不仅仅是可编程，也不局限在非全局变量和全局变量的差异。区块链中本聪共识真正可以从理念、抽象底层可以直接到达现实世界了。