https://t.co/j58CYkil13
Man attempts to behead another man in the street.
"No evidence of terror at this stage, say police"
If that isn’t terror, what is? How much more terrifying does it need to be to qualify as terror?
I want to talk about the beauty of my country and the poetry of my people to my children.
Today I had to tell my son I was reporting the attempted beheading of one of our men by a migrant.
I remember Fusilier Rigby. I remember the country I grew up in. I want it back.
Well #Newsnight reached an all time low tonight. No attempt at balance at all. 3 smug politicians in the studio all trotting out tropes about Trump, @Nigel_Farage and @elonmusk and of course blaming "The Far Right" for people's anger. Not the refugee from Sudan.... for whom there seemed to be some sympathy! What contempt they, and @BBCNews, have for the British people.
If a foreigner is in your country and demands you accept their culture as your culture. That’s not an immigrant, that’s an invader.
#muslim#belfast#attack
Just in the past 24 hours:
- Sudanese guy attempted to behead someone on the streets of Belfast
- Mass stabbing at school in Manchester
- Court hears that four Afghan migrants raped a 17 year old girl in Bristol
A #sudanese migrant abuses this country’s generous hospitality by attempting a beheading in Belfast. How many more medieval monsters are we going to admit to this country?
📰 Chilling authoritarian cracks start to show in Andy Burnham bid for the Makerfeild by-elections
Fire brigade bosses Mr Petch and Ms Ahmed said: 'We are aware that some staff members have chosen not to support Andy Burnham in their local areas. We know this may cause concern within our network and wider.
'The individuals involved have been spoken to, to make it clear that as members of GMFRS (Greater Manchester Fire and Rescue Service) our core values and professional behaviours must be displayed at all times. 🤔
They Broke It. Now They're Policing the Rubble.
A government document, leaked last week, contains a sentence that should stop every British citizen in their tracks. "For many living in the UK, the changes brought about by mass migration have been too much, too quickly, leaving people feeling as though they are losing their local and national identity." That's not a critic of this government speaking. That's this government, in its own words, in its own strategy document, admitting that millions of people who were branded racist for saying it were right all along.
Read that sentence again. Too much. Too quickly. Identity lost. The government knows. It has always known. And then turn the page, because the same document brands the Union Jack a potential tool of hate, creates an Islamophobia tsar, proposes a new definition of anti-Muslim hostility, and earmarks £800 million to manage the consequences of the policy it has just admitted was too much too quickly. The diagnosis and the prescription are in the same document. They point in opposite directions.
This is the two-stage operation the British public has been subjected to, and it's worth stating plainly. Stage one: pursue mass migration at a scale and speed that overwhelms housing, public services, school places and community infrastructure. Do this knowingly. Prof Alan Manning, former head of the government's own Migration Advisory Committee, has now confirmed publicly that migration was used to paper over economic failure; a conscious substitution of imported labour for genuine reform. The trade-off was understood. The warnings were issued. The decision was taken anyway.
Stage two: when the costs arrive: fractured communities, collapsed trust, sectarian bloc voting, parallel societies, antisemitism normalised in schools and hospitals, foreign conflicts fought out on British streets, reframe the native population's discomfort as the problem. Tell them their flag is a tool of hate. Tell them their concern about integration is extremism. Build a Prevent training course that classifies the belief that Western culture is under threat from mass migration as a subcategory of terrorist ideology, sitting alongside white supremacism and neo-Nazism. Not the policy that caused the fracture. The people who noticed it.
The British majority did not vote for this. They were not consulted. No manifesto proposed the transformation of their communities at this speed and scale. When they objected they were branded racist. When they persisted they were branded far-right. When they voted for parties that reflected their concern they were told they had been manipulated. And now, having absorbed all of that, they are presented with a social cohesion strategy that creates protected categories for the communities whose arrival caused the disruption, while treating the host population's identity as a sensitivity to be managed.
Religious leaders from Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh communities have already written to the Communities Secretary Steve Reed warning that the Islamophobia definition is so vague it could chill legitimate debate on grooming gangs, halal slaughter, gender segregation and face coverings. The Free Speech Union has warned that the Prevent definition of cultural nationalism is broad enough to capture the Prime Minister's own words. Starmer said without fair immigration rules we risk becoming an island of strangers. Under his government's own training materials, that sentiment is ideologically adjacent to extremism.
That is not irony. It's the logic of a political class that has run out of answers and reached for control instead. They made the choices. They deferred the costs. And now that the bill has arrived, they are telling the British people that the problem is not what was done to their country. It's their reaction to it. That is not a cohesion strategy. It's an insult dressed as one.
I am banned from entering the United Kingdom because I have been deemed to be "not conducive to the public good".
The Sudanese migrant who literally was cutting a man's head off in the middle of the street in Belfast was given refugee status and full financial benefits by the same government that banned me.
I have never seen a more glaring example of stupidity.
If Starmer were even slightly politically astute, he would realise after last night that the bare minimum required to prevent public order spiralling out of control is to do whatever it takes to stop the boats, close the hotels and detain asylum seekers. But no, the conversation is going to circle back to social media algorithms and the far right. He is on another planet.
This man is Valdo Calocane who murdered Grace, Barnaby and Ian Coates by stabbing them to death in Nottingham. I have just heard Barnabys Mum on the radio - this animal is currently a patient in a secure mental health unit and is receiving up to £800 in BENEFITS a month as technically he’s not a prisoner! I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. What an absolute insult to the victims families 💔@RestoreBritain
And another one.
Four actually.
That’s four Afghans raping a girl.
Remember Afghans far more likely proportionately to sexually assault British women and girls.
https://t.co/cvgKsQeeoo