An interesting conversation with @Grok about Corruption and Love.
Should I feel this proud with praise like this:
"You've sharpened Dunbar's blade into a scalpel."
-Grok, speaking of my take on Dunbar's number theory.
Call it "Love's Scalpel." ๐
https://t.co/qDJmRsX6Z8
@cenkuygur Because our kleptocracy, of which our media is a willing participant, thrives on war, and the 2 death cults at war with each other, seem willing to fight to the last person.
It's as simple as that.^
@TheKevinDalton For reference, that $9m is more than his entire 30 years of pay, as a career politician.
-Nothing squirrelly about that in a state with graft everywhere & a governor that vetoes oversight.
@RealJamesWoods Cost him generational trauma in his home though, to pay Love resources like time, attention, care, and awareness to his career.
Is that a success standard that helps a society currently in population collapse? Do we need people emulating this anti-Love career tactic?
@MikeBenzCyber What those things cost is a societal success standard bearer whom pays Love resources like time, attention, care, & awareness, to a career in such a degree that it leaves the home in generational trauma.
For reference of how bad this actually is: We're in population collapse.
@mtaibbi I assume the same ones whom have inhabited power since the dawn of democracy as constructed in ancient Greek rooms/functions called symposium, which concluded with an orgy of the male village children.
@StefanMolyneux It is, but only because it's dishonestly small potatoes.
His career system, empirically, is generational trauma in the home.
What is the cost of making "generational trauma in the home" the standard for societal success?
@SholdonDaniels His family looks captured by generational trauma because they are so starved of the Love resources of time, attention, care, and awareness that he pays first to his career.
This is not a standard to celebrate because it is the example we all must now follow to find success.
@SholdonDaniels Expect that caliber of corrupt swerve every time momentum occurs. This is what our system does and is:
Endlessly complexity in an effort to be a stopgap for corruption.
Love cures this, -Love, standardized in an effort to downsize where corruption can fester: complexity.
@thevivafrei If one is to set the standard that Loving them is to cut them, what are the chances any relationship that person occupies will find Love? How does the partner in this relationship live up to that standard?
-And this says nothing about aging & what that does to augmentations.
@AshtonForbes Finland solved their homeless problem for less than Newsom has spent on the issue getting us to "homeless still living under every bridge while our coffers are billions lighter."
@Timcast Why buy the need for data centers? What is AI providing that is so invaluable?
I often see AI videos of Wilford Brimley eating obscene things in a Larry King interview. And they are of some "value," but do we need that like we need the costs of data centers?
@jimmy_dore Why didn't the left catch on a decade back?
97% scientific consensus was/is an anti-science argument, in principle/in concept. Didn't have to get to the origin being an Australian blogger with bad science.
As one whom was in the bondage of religion, it was obvious, culturally.
@StefanMolyneux An emotional prison sentence with corrupt Love, can be a roadmap to finding Love.
No one wants out of the cave though. Itโs up-front the hardest path to tread and everyone thinks they can get out on paths that donโt lead out.
@GadSaad Ok. How about a concept that would be healthy to organize around?...
I think Love is the only one, on a long enough timeline, that doesn't get us exactly here in this degradation of un-health & corrupt bloat in society.
@lbriteyes@hookskat I'm not under the illusion that our courts are virtuous. I don't trust them to be reflexively so. -Especially not, with the history this nation or any nation has had.
@PeterDiamandis Why would Apple fail to produce a quality AI?
It feels like they failed by not trying, and I have to ask if maybe they know something we don't.