@davidlarkin12 @deanocity3 @CovMemorabilia@CovShirts87 It was worn just one time, it had the crest on so unlikely bought on the day. It was the first season of shirt sponsorships so maybe other away kits had sponsors already attached and as it was a tv game they needed another option? Strange though, likely not Admiral.
@philarn80@SkyBlueArchives Hi Phil, yes the plan was to move CovKits content onto the SkyBlueArchive and we had started that before our issues. It will all be back in the rebuild, we have plans to extend the kit section too, so hopefully it will be worth the wait!
@AlexndrJohnson@TheSkyBlueHub Any appointment is a risk. I donโt think Frankโs appointment has gone down like a lead balloon with City fans.
He needs to be given a fair chance like you hope anyone would be given. A lot of people are actually excited by the new coaching line up and his contacts and pull.
@Oldyccfc @talkSPORT@Sjopinion10 Surely itโs better Doug makes the decision with 12 games gone and gives the new guy the next transfer window after taking a look at the squad? They said funds would be available. If Robins couldnโt improve things weโd be in a relegation battle and DK explained the implications.
@awbuswell@hummel1923 As others have said, itโs the 1988-89 season, 2 subs were allowed then, they usually wore 12 and 14. So various players could have worn it. Each player normally had a preference for a long or short sleeve shirt, most chose short so probably narrows it down a bit more!
@80tribalcolours@ccfcshirts I think the yellow Tallon was only worn for one or two games so the need for the away version never came up. These are the away versions I have seen... https://t.co/zpxDCVd7Iv