@nbrink77@laing_chad95142@frogs4girls Because current dems aren’t doing much to stop republicans or improve life for the average citizen. The democratic voter base wants this to change, and this caused them to elect new leaders. What’s so hard to understand?
@nbrink77@hankfrackett@frogs4girls How are they pretending to be democrats? You’re acting like you must support Israel to be a democrat. You realize the values of the party change depending on the values of the voters right?
@nbrink77@frogs4girls@Gravescest123 our aim within the democratic party is to make it so it’s actually able to oppose the facists. So far, the current establishment democrats are unable to do so. We are simply helping you guys in the fight
@nbrink77@frogs4girls How is it usurping? The voters of the democratic party want this new socialism in the democratic party. This is quite literally the wishes of the people who support your party at least in NY. If democrat voters want the party to be more socialist, why shouldn’t it?
@RLrcgnzRL@Unkool_Aid@JamesDueck I told you I can agree they may have overstepped with the conveys, but one instance of the government going too far doesn’t make it an authoritarian regime. In a real authoritarian regime, any public dissent would be crushed.
@carl01157394744@JamesDueck If someone is being intimidated and called slurs while they’re simply trying to practice their religion do you think that should just be permitted?
@carl01157394744@JamesDueck They’re not prohibiting your ability to say anything bro. You can still talk shit about whoever you like they’re simply trying to stop it from actually harming people and making their lives worse.
@carl01157394744@JamesDueck If you think a PM shouldn’t have majority through floor crossings then why do you think the constitution never outlawed it? Would you say the same if it was Pierre?
@OceanHero21@groove_sdc What is this anti blackness you guys keep talking about with socialism? Where is the anti blackness? Socialism as an ideology has always been about free oppressed people including black people
@zeroxLucky@JamesDueck When the constitution was written you don’t think they considered that this could happen? Majority governments through floor crossings are legal, anyone in his position would do the same. If you can do something to legally speed up decision making would you not?