CrowdPeer combines open scholarly discussion with a voting system, allowing quality content to rise to the top and reviewers to build their reputation.
#PeerReview#openaccess
@pranea Probably improved it, but 2 YEARS 🤯... It's mind blowing that the peer review process is still so slow and lacking in innovation. We'd love to hear what you think of what we're building over at https://t.co/s9iG6CIJ7X .
@JosSanzSantos1 We totally agree @JosSanzSantos1 , too much hard work goes unrewarded. Come and take a look at what we're building at https://t.co/s9iG6CIJ7X.
What do you think would be a suitable reward?
@SeanaDuggan@MicrobioSoc Congratulations @SeanaDuggan ! We would love for you to bring your abilities as a reviewer to the Crowdpeer community. Come and share your knowledge at https://t.co/s9iG6CIJ7X
@mehmanib@scholarlykitchn We would love to hear more of your thoughts on this. We're thinking about the best way to acknowledge reviewers for their peer review contributions.
1/ Really interesting article from @ReaderMeter discussing the rise of preprints and their various merits and drawbacks.
At CrowdPeer, we're building an environment for the open peer review of #preprints. Here's some of our thoughts.
https://t.co/0NXhZDCDdZ
@ReaderMeter 7/ Open conversations also give reviewers a new platform to demonstrate their expertise. At CrowdPeer, by introducing comment voting, we will allow reviewers to get greater recognition for their contributions.
Build your reputation beyond the traditional academic framework. Get acknowledgment for the individual contributions you make to the discussion and gain credibility in the community.
#AcademicTwitter
CrowdPeer combines open scholarly discussion with a voting system, allowing quality content to rise to the top and reviewers to build their reputation.
#PeerReview#openaccess