@Hunchowitd72441@Clip_Station_ Come to east Europe to the whites from here and lets see how tough are you blacks in this countries 🤥 you will last literally 30 seconds
Patent allowance (vs. approval which we announced in late 2022) is the final go-ahead for patent issuance. This is a huge milestone for rewarded video, and generating licence fees through @verasitytech's patented tech. This is in addition to VeraViews and our adstack. 🔥
Verasity has now been granted full patent allowance for #rewardedvideo in the USA! 🔥
Patent allowance is the final step of the patent process, with patents granted after fees are paid☑️
The successful allowance of this patent will enable #Verasity to seek licencing fees from companies utilizing our technology in 2024 and beyond.
Read the full patent allowance here 👇 $VRA
https://t.co/mFxkPKjydJ
[3/3]🧵
3⃣ Solutions $VRA
I don't mind if PoV migration is delayed as long as the issues below are resolved. Most communities would probably agree.
▪️ Remove all PoV stored in exchange cold wallets
The excuse that only 10 billion marker tokens are stored in a cold wallet for security reasons is inconsistent.
That's because those wallets that store 60 billion marker tokens are stored there because they are safe.
If so, move the marker token held by the cold wallet to that wallet. It's a very easy task.
If you don't want to do even this, please let us know which exchange you have signed an agreement with and how many marker tokens you have agreed to store. Because there's no reason why we can't tell you this.
▪️ Do not use "0xaf91f2...40d71088" wallet
Unless you are intentionally trying to avoid tracking, do not use controlled wallets that hold a mix of $VRA and PoV marker token.
Use a separate wallet so anyone can transparently track it.
▪️ Recognize the seriousness of tokenomics
Although the team has caused verasians more pain in the bear market, it still has a strong community.
How grateful are you for this?
Fixing tokenomics does not mean the team is showing mercy to the community. It's just correcting a wrong.
They are showing utmost patience. It is the minimum courtesy to reveal at least a rough plan rather than package it as big news.
If it takes a lot of time, move to another Etherchain. This is because Etherchain has already been verified and does not require testing.
After moving, allow plenty of time to discover a new chain.
To all verasians📢
do not misunderstand. I'm just helping rebuild trust in Verasity team with the easiest solutions.
Additionally, I don't blame blind shillers. i just know that they are not aware of the seriousness of the current situation.
But only if we all speak with one voice will everything return to normal and recovery.
The more a serious problem is hidden, the more irreversible it becomes.
@verasitytech@block_writer #VRA $VRA
It is all there for $VRA, you just need to look for it.
• @verasitytech partners with @Brightcove
• 30 companies join Brightcove just so they can leverage Verasity tech
• @NHL starts using Brightcove, @Yahoo starts using Brightcove
• VeraViews integrated with the Brightcove player, integration in 4 simple steps.
• Brightcove launches a new “AD monetization” service that will “maximize ad revenue”.
• You can't maximize ad revenue without eliminating fake views, luckily VeraViews is available to every Brightcove client.
Is @Vera_Views integral part of the Brightcove AdTech stack that Brightcove advertises to its clients?
Either way, there is a real need for solution like $VRA and what differentiates Verasity from its competitors is:
- Speed
- Patent protection
- Convenience (easy to integrate)
- Effectiveness (detects higher % of fake views and saves more money)
- Transparency (open ledger technology to improve transparency and accountability)
Why am I one of the biggest $VRA whales?
These last few weeks you can hear a lot of discussion regarding ad fraud and advertising in general.
Advertisers and publishers are starting to realize that they should not just accept that the industry is losing $200b dollars per year on ad fraud.
With Elon Musk bringing various issues of the advertising industry to the mainstream media, solutions like @verasitytech will become increasingly more popular.
$VRA with its ad stack @Vera_Views provides a patented solution for all these issues. Transparency and validity of views is what the advertising industry lacks and what it can get back with Verasity!
This is why I believe so much in $VRA commercial success, it's all onwards and upwards from here!
Most important tweet you will read today!
It is time to zoom out & see the big picture for $VRA
Last Bull run with @verasitytech
🚫 Zero clients
🚫 No case studies
🚫 No buy backs and burns
🚫 Did not have W2E patent
🚫 Smaller community
🚫 Fewer holders
- What's next for $VRA? The game has changed
✅ Huge buybacks every quarter, more than $1.2 million worth of $VRA already bought back and burned.
✅ More clients will come
✅ VeraCard & VeraPay
✅ Becoming the industry standard for ad fraud solutions
✅ Separating the $VRA from POV marker tokens in next few months.
This is going to be $20b to $30b dollar project next bull run, easily.
$VRA has a supply of 10B & has the same supply as $MATIC
#MATIC mcap rn= 6.5B & sits @ 0.70c
#VRA mcap=50m & sits at 0.006
$MATIC was once sub 0.01c like #vra is now & rallied to 3$ peak bull w this supply. Few really understand the true price #verasity could hit peak bull
. @elonmusk Surprised @Twitter using DoubleVerify to control bots. Opaque & poor results stopping ad fraud, although a standard. As you know, ad fraud is an order of magnitude > than currently reported. @verasitytech's Proof of View case studies = transparency & 90%+ results.
Today @verasitytech and $VRA community was attacked by @bull_bnb as he publicly proclaimed that $VRA is a scam and overrated.
He made a post explaining why he said that and it goes as followed:
I am not going to argue his personal opinion but I am going to argue things he claimed are facts.
"They basically inflated their own supply by 20 percent because they were moving to some new contract.
so they:
> Print more tokens
> They burn the tokens they printed
> The public did not understand that they inflated supply
> They posted a transaction of the burn ($50M burn)
> Then they claimed that this was money made through their ad protocol
so basically they manipulated everyone into believing they were making money and had a real burn
it was just a fake burn made by them.
Correct me if am wrong.
But this info is legit"
Lets break this down:
1.
"They basically inflated their own supply by 20 percent because they were moving to some new contract."
- This sentence makes no sense, $VRA minted warchest tokens together with POV marker tokens back in 2021 when there were no talks of moving to a different contract. The separation of contracts (seperating $VRA from POV marker tokens) is happening because of the community proposal that got accepted in October 2023.
https://t.co/hBpiqQ7rzY
2.
> Print more tokens
> They burn the tokens they printed
> The public did not understand that they inflated supply
> They posted a transaction of the burn ($50M burn)
> Then they claimed that this was money made through their ad protocol
- If he took some time to check this he would see that every token burn is transparently conducted on the blockchain, and transaction hashes are provided for each quarterly burn, as well as for the warchest burn.
- These hashes can be verified by anyone on the blockchain explorer where you can see where are tokens coming from, you can also observe price action prior to those buy backs as they are quite evident on the chart.
- The public was made very much aware of the minting of $10b Warchest tokens and POV marker tokens.
The team was transparent about this and published numerous medium articles and conducted multiple AMAs and public discussions.
- They explained the reason for the creation of the Warchest and kept the community informed throughout the process. If the intention was deceptive, the team wouldn't be so open about their actions.
- The reference to the $50 million burn is related to the 10b warchest tokens that got burned, not bought back and burned as @bull_bnb claims.
The valuation of these tokens at market rates equated to approximately $50 million. This was an observation made first by myself, as I tried to emphasize the financial significance of the burn.
- The team never stated that they bought back these tokens using revenue from their ad protocol. So @bull_bnb is straight up lying here.
• This burn signified the team's commitment to the project and the community by giving up on $50 million in potential funding and showcases their confidence in the commercial success of @Vera_Views.
• All other quarterly burns are actually buy backs from the open market and burns using the revenue generated by the @verasitytech products.
• In few months $VRA will have max supply the same as circulating supply around 10b $VRA, with super aggressive deflationary tokenomics powered by revenue generating products.
• Moral of the story is that you should never blindly follow what "influencers" say on this platform, no matter how many followers they have as that is the easiest way to get financially destroyed.
I also extend my invitation to @bull_bnb to ask any questions he may have on this topic, as I have been very vocal in the past with my constructive criticism on $VRA.
Apparently YouTube premium family plan is going up from $17.99 a mth to $32.99 a month
$CSIX Carbon browser is free to download and has an ad blocker that stops ads on @YouTube, as well as many other great features
You're welcome 😊
Wow, #YouTube Premium going up to $32 a month... that's insane!! ❌
As Mick says below, use @trycarbonio#Web3 app to block YouTube ads and play in the background also
Then check out the $CSIX token supporting @trycarbonio ⚡️⚡️
Partnerships with $VRA and many others - LFG
I do hope they actually call them #POV, would make it fairly clear
They constantly burn and mint these currently, so a final large burn of 90b $VRA marker tokens would be an appropriate send off to Valhalla! 🔥