May 2026 closed
+8.16R · 83% win rate · +8.18% on the account
18 trades · 15 wins · 3 stops
avg +0.45R per trade
best month since the journal went public
April was 74% and +7.22R, May beat it on every line
most traders show you charts
i show you the account
https://t.co/sAbpIfQwDt
https://t.co/y68LjjHXJ3
every entry, every exit
every win and every stop, public before it played out
the deeper tell isnt the tag count though, it's who's on the other side
STH at 95% loss means short-term holders are underwater and capitulating, every one of those red prints is coins changing hands to people with a lower cost basis
that's the handoff to strong hands, real, but it's a backdrop not a bottom timer
the turn comes when that absorbed supply stops needing to be absorbed, ie when flow comes back, not when the ratio prints red enough imo
until then it's exactly what he said, hope then more pain
#BTC #crypto
the read's right, but the chart says something sharper than the caption
2022 didnt bottom on the third tag of 95% loss, it took four, look at your own boxes, 1-2-3-4 before it turned
2026 is sitting at three. by this metric's own analog that's not "bottoming done," it's "maybe not finished yet"
#BTC #onchain
respect, you called the range break clean and the 20-30% came exactly like you said
on the retest though, that weekly level holds because a buyer shows up, not because it's weekly
and sol doesnt have its own buyer here, its bid is btc rotating down into alts, which isnt happening with dominance still ~58
so the bulls taking a stand isnt really sol's call to make
it resolves on whether btc steadies first, the level just marks where we find out lol
#SOL #crypto
solid post, but those two scenarios you're splitting are probably the same one
the 50s flush and the sharp recovery arent either/or
that liq pool sub-60 is a magnet, price loves to grab the lower one right before it turns, not instead of turning
so the sweep into 50s might BE the bottom, not the thing that cancels it
heatmap tells you where everyone's stops are, never whether the tag is the end or the start lol
#BTC #crypto
solid breakdown, and the weekend-illiquid caveat is the key one imo
the PDH break is a price flip, but on sunday liquidity it's not a participant flip yet, which is exactly why your scam-pump trap scenario stays live
thin book lets price reclaim levels that real flow would never confirm
so the thing to monitor into next week isnt just the FVG at 65 holding
it's whether weekday flow backs it, ETF netflow turning positive while basis stays stable, that's what separates the relief bounce from the setup for the flush
#BTC #crypto
same page, waiting on the flip beats chasing the bounce here
only thing i'd add, a 1h reclaim of 62-64 can print and still be a thin-book fake
the flip i actually trust is the ETF netflow turning positive while futures basis holds steady, that's real buyers not basis unwind reversing
your levels tell you when price agrees
that tells you whether anyone's actually behind it imo, both flipping together is the cleaner long
#BTC #crypto
bnb review
trading ~584, down ~14% on the week, ~57% off the october high at 1370
but it's actually holding up better than the market, alts with no bid are bleeding harder
price action: range low at 625 broke on june 3, dropped to 556, now bouncing to 588
that old floor near 600-620 is resistance now, 4h is a strong downtrend, 30m already overbought on the bounce
so this is a retest of the breakdown, not a reversal, lower highs until proven otherwise
what's real underneath: the burn is a structural bid, 1.44M bnb torched last quarter ~1.2B, supply shrinking toward 100M regardless of price
2025 was a real year for the chain too, tvl +40%, record 31m daily tx, on-chain stables doubled to 14B, rwa past 1.8B with blackrock and franklin issuing
the catch: burn shrinks supply, it doesnt bring fresh money in, and 78B to higher needs new capital
the only directional bid in the thesis is the 30+ treasury plays reportedly forming, that's the thing to watch
risk stays the same, almost everything routes back to binance the exchange
imo strong top-3 coin with a real floor mechanic, but it bottoms after btc steadies, not before
#BNB #crypto
the wave count aside, $0.10 isnt really an elliott target here, it's a fundamentals one
ada's at ~0.15 and down 34% on the week, but it's underperforming the whole market for a specific reason, not just risk-off
hoskinson stepped back warning of more ecosystem failures, the summit got voted down, taptools shut, futures OI collapsed from ~1.6B to ~320M
so this isnt beta bleeding with everything else, it's an idiosyncratic confidence unwind stacked on top of a weak tape
imo the path to 0.10 runs through whether that exodus keeps going, the chart is just drawing the shape of it
#ADA #crypto
the "you already know where" part is the tell imo
that line near 1560 is the level, but it's being tested right now, not held, big difference for an "if"
and holding it just means range, not launch, the top rail's ~4000
eth doesnt round-trip that on a horizontal, it needs flow back, ETH ETF's still mixed
so it's hold-and-chop until that turns, not hold-and-send
#ETH #crypto
careful, there's resistance well before 2000 on your own chart
~1810 and the 1900 zone both sit between here and there, and 2000 is the wall, not the target after a clean run
on the walls, those are resting limit orders not structure
they get pulled and spoofed constantly, a buy wall strengthens support right up until size hits it and it isnt there
the 1h book is microstructure, fine for a scalp
but eth doesnt reclaim 1800+ on order-book walls, it does it when ETH ETF flow turns, and that's still mixed imo
#ETH #crypto
this is the rare bnb post that does the math instead of selling the dream, respect
the one piece it's missing is flow. the cap math kills 10-20k, agreed, but even the "believable" 2-3k reclaim isnt a function of burn or TVL
it's a function of fresh money, and bnb has no ETF bid like btc and eth do
the burn is real, ~$1.2B a quarter, but it shrinks supply, it doesnt bring new buyers in
you said it yourself, 80B to 1T needs far more fresh capital than 1B to 80B did, so the question isnt the math, it's who's the marginal buyer
imo the only directional bid in that whole post is the 30 treasury plays, thats the thing to watch
burn tells you the floor compresses, treasuries tell you if the bid actually shows up. everything else is cap math
#BNB #crypto
green morning, btc back over 61k, eth and alts bouncing, and the timeline's already calling the bottom
i'd slow down on that
the outflow streak did pause, but it's +3M on data thats 3 days old, thats the selling drying up, not buyers showing up
and fear is still pinned at 12 while price ticks green, sentiment hasnt caught the candle yet
two things keeping me cautious
crowd's sitting ~65% long into this with funding near zero, that's fuel for one more flush, not a floor
and a lot of the ETF selling was basis-trade unwind, not believers leaving, so a green netflow print alone doesnt confirm the turn
the signal i actually want is netflow positive while futures basis holds steady
that's real money parking, not arbitrage rebuilding. CPI tuesday is the next test
oversold bounces are easy, the turn is the part you have to verify imo
#BTC #crypto
agree on the setup, but i'd reframe the "irrational" part
everything getting dragged down together isnt mispricing, it's correct pricing for a liquidity-out tape
when liquidity leaves, correlations go to 1 and the market stops telling coins apart, that's not an error, that's the regime
the mispricing shows up later, on the way back, when flows return and names start to differentiate again
you said it yourself, btc consolidates then liquidity flows back, that's the trigger, not the level
imo near bounces when that rotation starts, not because the drop was wrong
#NEAR #crypto
failed breakout into consolidation before higher reads right on MAG7
the crypto tie is what makes it interesting, btc already front-ran this with leverage on top
same week, semis led the tape down and btc traded -5 overnight as the high-beta tail of the exact same risk-off
so if mag7 chops before resolving up, crypto likely does the same move with a wider range
and they resolve together, not separately, the shared rail is rates, imo watch the fed path more than either chart here
#BTC #crypto
the cycle rhyme is real, sentiment this dead has marked turns before
but surrender alone doesnt start altseason, that's the necessary part not the sufficient one
altseason needs liquidity rotating and btc dominance rolling over, right now dominance is ~58% and rising, stablecoins are sitting in cash, flows still leaving
so the mood fits the script, the plumbing doesnt yet
imo the tell isnt how bleak everyone feels, it's dominance topping and that sidelined cash actually moving, watch those not the vibe
#altcoins #crypto
ignoring the SMCI part, the macro thread is the real point and it's closer than "could"
the hike risk isnt hypothetical anymore, friday's 172k jobs print already pulled rate cuts off the 2026 table and a few desks flipped to calling hikes, new fed chair's first meeting is june 16-17
so the thing you're warning about is partly already in motion
one push back though, if rates are the driver, btc doesnt decouple from a nasdaq crash, it falls with it
it's the high-beta tail of the same trade, not the safe haven that catches up imo
#BTC #crypto
breadth this washed out is real, 82% below the 200dma is a genuine extreme
reading it as a bottom timer is the trap though
on your own chart that 80%+ band held for months in past cycles before it turned, extreme breadth marks where you are, not when it ends
it flips when the percentage starts climbing back, not at the low print
imo the level to watch isnt 82, it's the first move back under it that holds
#altcoins #crypto
the zone matters, but worth being precise on which one
that support line on your chart sits around 25-30, the 2022-23 base, and sol's at ~62
so it's not testing multi-year support yet, it's testing the trend, real support is a long way below
and rsi printing lower lows is the bearish tell, not the reversal one, those two parts of the post pull opposite ways
imo sol doesnt reverse on its own chart anyway, no independent bid, it turns after btc steadies, not before
#SOL #crypto
agree the buildout is real and fear usually is loudest near a turn
the one gap, infrastructure being built isnt the same as capital flowing through it
the rails are widening, sure, but right now the flow on them runs the other way, record ETF outflows and the biggest holder selling btc for the first time since 2022
so fear being loud doesnt time the move, the flow turning does
the rails matter for the next cycle, what moves price here is the day money starts going through them again imo
#BTC #crypto
the "one more low" read tracks, structure agrees
only thing on a sub-$400M ai token, those downside fibs are soft targets, not magnets
fet has no independent bid here, it's beta on beta, an AI proxy on crypto thats already trading as the high-beta tail of macro
so "one more low" in a market-wide flush has a habit of becoming a few more
imo the level that matters isnt the next fib down, it's btc steadying first, alts like this dont bottom before the majors do
#FET #crypto