@elonmusk@Apple Hopefully, infrastructure projects like https://t.co/Be28LdMXDc and the ASI Super Intelligence Alliance https://t.co/CSAgUf3gOR will provide appropriate direction and trust for AI given that major corporations are controlling the algorithms. Just my thought - however, novice here
@IOHK_Charles Hey CH, I still believe my post about EDI needs to be also discussed when legislative discussions take place whenever that time occurs within the US Govt crypto forum
@Oraclecharli3 @TheDAppAnalyst @GeniusyieldO@chainlink@Cardano Well put team. Yes Chali3 is built for cardano and more support needs to be given. If all eggs are in one basket ...being link then this is not sound reliability
The importance of EDI is yet to be realised globally, however, mark my words ... Professor Aggelos and the IOG team at Edinburgh University will be used forever more as a test matrix. The Edinburgh Decentralisation Index is an important achievement for the distruptive movement.
@AWLDAO Again. Keyboard warrior typing away. These are legitimate concerns raised and there's the usual tit for tat behind a keyboard and not real content behind your retorts. Which i will no longer entertain until further information is provided by any follow-up pieces being conducted.
@JedH89878250 @Encrypt2 I would be interested to understand your version of events from the meeting and point of view Shunsuke as there seems to be validity in the article. I would further like understanding from other Emurgo hierachy on if this is systemic within Emurgo @Emurgo_Ken_JP
@JedH89878250 @IOHK_Charles@emurgo_io@AstarterDefiHub Very interesting take on a prominent emurgo hierachy member in a powerful position. I look forward to seeing @AstarterDefiHub response along with further input from @emurgo_io team on reasoning behind allowing prominent figures in allowing such practises to happen on their watch
@IOHK_Charles G'day CH. Happy birthday cobba. It's essential to detach from media platforms and the abuse that comes with its use. Enjoy the time away and say G'day to the Bison and the farm animals from down under...
Just inspected the Starship booster, which the arms have now placed back in its launch mount. Looks great!
A few outer engine nozzles are warped from heating & some other minor issues, but these are easily addressed.
Starship is designed to achieve reflight of its rocket booster ultimately within an hour after liftoff. The booster returns within ~5 minutes, so the remaining time is reloading propellant and placing a ship on top of the booster.
Since your handle is “Whole Mars”, perhaps this lengthy reply is apropos:
Getting the cost per ton to the surface of Mars low enough that humanity has the resources to make life multiplanetary requires a roughly 1000X improvement in rocket & spacecraft technology.
Recent US Mars missions have had a cost per ton of useful load to the surface of Mars of about $1B. Moreover, it has become more, not less, expensive over time!
To build a city on Mars that can grow by itself likely requires at least a million tons of equipment, which would therefore require >$1000 trillion, an obviously impossible number, given that US GDP is only $29T.
However, if rocket technology can be improved by 1000X, then the cost of becoming sustainably multiplanetary would drop to ~$1T, which could be spread out over 40 or more years, so <$25B/year.
At that cost, it becomes possible to make life multiplanetary, ensuring the long-term survival of life as we know it, without materially affecting people’s standard of living on Earth.
Starship is designed to achieve a >1000X improvement over existing systems and, especially after yesterday’s booster catch and precise ocean landing of the ship, I am now convinced that it can work.