CTBadger22

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@JoePompliano They should enjoy it while they can. The big conferences are going to flex. They will take control of the playoff structure and tell Notre Dame that they have to play on an even playing field, join a conference, revenue, share, or be excluded from playoff eligibility

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@benzkenney Is it possible Fickell was carried by his coordinators who now are failing? For example, Tressel inherited Freeman’s defense. Cincy ‘s defense regressed every year after that

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@DevyEusuf Sam Ponder 2.0

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@JeffRoemer @thorku Nope. Glaring needs at OL and CB need to be addressed. Better O-line play will have a multiplying effect on RB output. Plus, there is always RB value that falls into Day2/3

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@barryisthedon @GabyUrrutia247

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@kyleumlang I don’t know…the dude with the dyed beard?

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@heitner Notice he doesn’t say that this is the language Lucas signed up for. Also, revenue sharing is different from agreements with collectives. Again with the innuendo. Facts please

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@badgerbarstool Sounds like he’s not playing for anybody next year 🤔

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@heitner @HEITNERLEGAL No reason given, you’re just going to imply wrongdoing? If UW is wrong, so be it, but there is another side to this story. If you mess around you might just have the opportunity to defend yourself against a defamation lawsuit

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@KayvonOjulari HAHAHAHAHA 🤣 this is the most moronic proposal I’ve seen. No 1st?! Instead of the 2nd and 4th rounders, why not offer a provisional 6th round in 2028 that triggered if the giants send 22 players to the Pro Bowl? 🤡

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@daneasaur_ @himdatdude11 @SkolSmith No glasses 🤓 🤣

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@daneasaur_ @himdatdude11 @SkolSmith Dude I’m out at a bar. Not doing your job for you. But watch football for a bit…EVERY snapper adjusts, perfectly legal

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@daneasaur_ @himdatdude11 @SkolSmith There’s this thing called Google on the interweb which lets you research stuff like nfl rules. Give it a try

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@BadgersBallKnow Bro, what are you talking about? 113 points in 5 games is -23 pts per game 😶

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@PurpleForTheWin Dumb question. Yes they’ll pay him if he’s elite. In the meantime the cap resources will help to continue to strengthen the roster

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@AriWasserman They will be fine until Phil Knight is gone 🙄

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@czabe All true, except…none of that matters when the player is deemed defenseless. ANY forcible contact to the head/neck area of a defenseless player qualifies. Gene Steratore has confirmed it should’ve been targeting as well

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@yourfavecpa @GeneSteratore You’re missing the point. All he’s saying is that it should’ve been a targeting penalty. He’s not saying Arizona State would’ve won the game

[CTBadger22 @CTBadger1]

@TheWilieCoyote @zingsports1 @JamieDyckes @FrankCaliendo @cheesehead_tide Once again, the rule is different for a defenseless player. This gets called all the time. Fwiw I watched the game and play multiple times…it was forcible contact to the head. I have no skin in the game, but watching refs swallow their whistle is pathetic