Cut the nonsense

Pro-science (economic) conservative. Have physics PhD and love science, in general. Free speech and due process advocate. Egalitarian.

[Cut the nonsense @Cutnonsense]

Half the universe was missing... until now https://t.co/OBFrEyVotN

Another great video from @veritasium

[Tom Cotton @TomCottonAR]

All of these Dems had no issue with Graham Platner being a Jew-hating Nazi who assaults women.

He's only suddenly a problem for the Dems because polls show he loses to Susan Collins.

They're complete frauds.

[Mary Katharine Ham @mkhammer]

What terrifies me is if we accept as credible allegations of physical and sexual assault about a man with a Nazi tattoo, imagine the backlash against men with Nazi tattoos.

[Michelle Tandler @michelletandler]

So let me get this straight --

Last month the New York Times put "Israeli trained rape dogs" on their front page -- with zero evidence...

... But played down/hid the rape allegations of someone running for US SENATE..?!

[Scott Jennings @ScottJenningsKY]

Message from Dems today: As long as you hate the Jews and confine your assaults to conservative women, you get a pass.

[Ben Shapiro @benshapiro]

Man, I can't believe the candidate with the Nazi tattoo who bragged about jacking off in porta-potties and allegedly said he wanted to rape home invaders ("but not in a gay way")...is also allegedly rapey. It's always the ones you most suspect.

[Kosher @koshercockney]

He won’t name who killed them, so I will.

They were killed by Islamic extremist terrorists.

[Hillel Neuer @HillelNeuer]

Those who took $1 billion a year from Western taxpayers to poison the minds of Palestinian children need to be held accountable. Someone needs to go to prison.

[Batya Ungar-Sargon @bungarsargon]

“Ro Khanna will always and forever be the Graham Platner defender.”

[Siraj Hashmi @SirajAHashmi]

Update?

[Lyndsey Fifield @lyndseyfifield]

I actually understand why Democrat leaders didn't take our stories seriously when the Times reported them in June but are taking them seriously now.

It was by design.

The line most shared from the piece was the claim that the Times “could not corroborate” my story despite talking to two of my friends.

I gave them the contact information for five friends.

They called the two who I clarified would not know about the abuse but would be able to affirm our relationship timeline, events, etc.

They simply did not call the other three.

I also gave them the names of all my former roommates who remembered him stalking our row house (which was about 5 houses down from his) and waiting for me to return. I gave them screenshots of messages between these roommates and I discussing it.

I gave them the names of other men I dated who might have remembered him following us around the hill and showing up on my stoop after we walked home from dates to confront us. I gave them emails to my landlord urgently ending my lease and moving to an apartment across town and diary entries talking about it - all time marked.

I told them that during pre-marital counseling I had spoken to my ex-fiance about the abuse because I had to explain to him why I reacted with such terror any time he lost his temper. They said oh NO we don't need to bother HIM (or my priest). Besides, I had written about it in my diary in detail, they reassured.

As the weeks dragged on I stopped trying to give them evidence because the amount I had already given them seemed to overwhelm them and I thought it meant they clearly had more than enough to verify my every claim.

My friends might not have known the details of the abuse, but they affirmed that yes, I had told them that he was abusive—long before he ran for Senate.

Besides, they assured, my part in their reporting would be small. I thought my details would only serve to affirm Jenny and the other anonymous woman.

Jenny and I - having never met or spoken - both shared with these reporters terrifyingly similar details of intimate partner violence, coercive control, and cycles of abuse/love bombing. The third unnamed woman in the story did as well.

But tell me again how they “could not corroborate.”

[Dan Bongino @dbongino]

As we all anxiously wait for Tucker to produce a single piece of evidence for any of his psychotic claims, I sense a growing rage amongst his shrinking number of groupies.
They must know by now that they’ve been played. They’ve invested their time in a circus clown who has backed himself in a corner. So rather than admit they got played, they rage out and claw at their own faces while emptying themselves into their pull-up diapers. It’s a sad thing to witness. The doomers and grifters are all being exposed.

[Noam Blum @neontaster]

The next time you see Graham Platner will be his announcement of dropping out. The next time after that will be his interview on Tucker about how AIPAC and the Epstein Class did this to him.

[Noam Blum @neontaster]

“Aw man, I covered up my Totenkopf for nothing!”

[Peter J. Hasson @peterjhasson]

Reminder: this is how Mehdi Hasan reacted to Lyndsey Fifield revealing Platner was physically abusive

[Libs of TikTok @libsoftiktok]

Brutal CN ☠️

[Siraj Hashmi @SirajAHashmi]

"I was okay with Graham Platner getting a Nazi Totenkopf tattoo, being physically abusive as a boyfriend, his racist & misogynistic comments on Reddit, sexting minors on Kik, wishing death on a fellow soldier, cranking hog in a porta-potty, lying about his reason for enlisting in the military for the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, leaving the military to work for Blackwater, and being a communist, but SEXUAL ASSAULT is where I DRAW THE LINE."

[Nate Silver @NateSilver538]

Like how many signals did you need to know this guy was bad news?

[Luai Ahmed @JustLuai]

A message from a Lebanese man in Beirut to @AnaKasparian, @cenkuygur and all other Hezbollah enthusiasts:

"Stop speaking on behalf of the Lebanese people. The vast majority of Lebanese people want Hezbollah to disarm. Most of us want peace with Israel."