Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic

Nacionalista català. Classicisme, acceleracionisme, modernisme. Ad astra per aspera.

Parlo d'economia i tecnologia cada diumenge a @CATechbiz

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

El contracte social a Catalunya s'aguanta sobre en Jordi, 30 anys, informàtic a una empresa mitjana.

Un minut de silenci per ell. 🙏

[Devon Eriksen @Devon_Eriksen_]

The message of a protest is "we don't like this".

The message of a riot is "we don't like this, and we're able to do something about it".

People who unconditionally call for peace and calm, regardless of the provocation, don't fundamentally understand how politics works in the real world.

They do understand that the purpose of politics is to provide an alternative to violence, but that's as far as their understanding goes. They don't think through the implications, usually because they are quite comfortable with things as they are.

If politics is an alternative to violence, then politics is a proxy for violence.

And that means you have to dole out power in proportion to capacity for violence. Or someone's going to figure out they can do better by flipping the table.

Monarchy wasn't replaced by democracy because of fine-sounding philosophical ideals and eloquent documents declaring this or that.

Democracy happened because if you added rifling to the flintlock firearm, suddenly a individual farmer with a tube was the pinnacle of military technology, and now you had to keep all the farmers with tubes happy by giving them political power.

(Ancient Greek democracy had a similar relationship with the hoplite warrior.)

When political systems work well, for a while, the violence they represent becomes further and further from people's minds, and those who can't effectively commit or direct violence worm their way into power, and begin to take it away from those who can.

And they'll defend their position by saying that violence is unthinkable, barbaric, always bad, must be disavowed at all costs, etc.

This isn't some sort of high-minded principle on their part. It simply means one of two things. Either "the status quo works for me, so I don't want you to upset it", or "I suck at violence, and I don't want to have to fight".

They want young men demoralized, so that their artificial meritocracy of spreadsheets, or their non-meritocracy of patronage networks, can be protected from the natural meritocracy of conflict.

This means that riots aren't actually for achieving any specific material aim. They are for reminding the comfortable that judges and bureaucrats and policemen have home addresses and families. And that violence is always on the table.

A protest would only send the message that the Irish don't want to be ethnically cleansed. But the bureaucrats and judges and lawyers already know that. They just don't care.

A riot reminds them that they have to care, because the Irish have a long tradition of doing something about it.

[Aleix Salvans @aleixsalvans]

Els sublevats ho tenien molt clar. I el baró de Segur era el pare de l'autor d'aquestes ratlles, José Luis de Vilallonga.

[Auron MacIntyre @AuronMacintyre]

It turns out Africa and the Middle East weren’t dangerous and dirty because of colonialism or oppression but because they were full of barbarians who make it that way

The people are the problem and when you import them they turn your country into their country

[Diamond O’Connel @DiamondConnel]

There exists, no longer, any revolutionary potential among the Irish Republicans in Northern Ireland. The community has been captured and pacified. It’s leadership is comprised of soft, bourgeois, champagne socialists preoccupied with making safe, state endorsed statements

[Today in History @TodayinHistory]

Antoni Gaudí looking on the completed and blessed Tower of Jesus Christ in approval.

Well done, Barcelona!

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

Què té a veure la mà d'obra amb no deportar criminals estrangers?

És pel capitalisme que ensenyen islam a les escoles?

Quina finalitat econòmica tenen aturats, turistes sanitaris o "refugiats" analfabets?

Tot per ofuscar que són armes biològiques en un pla de dominació POLÍTIC

[Noel Huguet Sabà @NoelHuguet]

En aquest nou context, el mecanisme per proveir excés de treballadors al capital a Occident ja no és la prole del proletariat, sinó la immigració o la deslocalització. D'això alguns en diuen externalització de la natalitat.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

@Espball @q_u_i_m_

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

@pilgrimofbeauty @Kosibou1 És una guerra civil. El problema no és principalment amb els immigrants sinó amb les elits traïdores que els han portat, encimbellat com a classe protegida, i utilitzat com a ariet contra la població nadiva.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

La conseqüència necessària i inevitable de la invasió demogràfica mai consentida és una guerra civil salvatge.

Per què els partits del sistema ens hi condueixen alegrement?

Per què n'han fet llur prioritat política i línia vermella?

No és cap efecte secundari: és l'objectiu.

[Martin Sellner @MartinSellner_]

The mostly peaceful demonstrations in Belfast last night are just a trailer for what's going to happen if you don't stop this crazy social experiment right now.

Remigration is the only rational, humane and legal solution to prevent Western Europe from turning into a post-democratic gangland.

Remigration or civil war. Your choice.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

Hi ha qui segueix veient la immi com un intent de solucionar problema de mà d'obra, economia, etc

Si fos el cas:

1) No hi hauria portes obertes ni MENAs, es deportaria...

2) S'acomodarien preferències ciutadanes.

El reemplaçament és un pla de captura POLÍTICA, enteneu-ho ja.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

@lescalfordecasa Els règims socialistes miraven de destruir el mercat encara provocant caos, pobresa, etc.

Els règims globalistes miren de destruir les nacions encara que això els faci trontollar.

És un mandat ideològic, però també estratègia de control contra la dissidència real o en potència.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

Belfast Tonight. Britain Tomorrow. The Trajectory Is Set.

On Monday night a man was pinned to a residential street in north Belfast and stabbed repeatedly in the face and neck. Members of the public intervened. One used a hurling stick. By Tuesday night three houses and a Middle Eastern supermarket were burning. Infants were carried from neighbouring properties. A police vehicle was set alight. Politicians called for calm.

Remember this night. Not because it is exceptional. Because it is not.
This is where the road leads. Not in twenty years. Now. Belfast has experienced serious immigration-related disorder for three consecutive years. The same cycle every time. Attack. Outrage. Disorder. Calls for calm. Nothing. The next incident. What is playing out in Belfast is not a malfunction. It is the destination. A state that cannot name the cause manages the consequence instead, and calls it governance.

Now project forward. Not with imagination. With arithmetic. Over 200,000 people have arrived by small boat since 2018. The majority are unvetted young men from countries with no cultural alignment with the host society. They are housed in communities without consent. Dispersed without warning. The removal rate is four percent. The government knows the other ninety-six percent are staying. It has decided to manage that fact rather than reverse it. Every year the number grows. Every year the concentration deepens. Every year the friction increases.

In ten years those concentrations will not be streets. They will be districts. In twenty years they will be cities within cities, governed by parallel authority, answering to parallel loyalties. We have watched this happen in France. The banlieues were built accommodation by accommodation, retreat by retreat, until the French state no longer entered them except in force. Britain is on the same road, travelling faster.

The trigger events will multiply. One policing incident. One foreign conflict landing on a British street. One court case, one arrest, one viral video. Any spark will do because the kindling has been laid by policy and left to dry by neglect. The riots will not be contained to one city for one night. They will spread, as they spread in France, as they spread across England last summer, because the grievance is not local. It is national. And the anger on both sides will harden with every cycle.

Public order will not hold at current trajectory. The police already negotiate where they once enforced. Investigations are quietly dropped. Reports go unfiled. The state keeps the peace by lowering the bar for what constitutes peace. That bar will keep falling because the alternative requires confronting what the political class has spent thirty years refusing to confront.

The political system will bend to the new demography. It already has. Candidates selected on foreign conflicts. Councils controlled by sectarian bloc voting. Representatives answering to communal leaderships rather than constituents. That process will accelerate as the demographic weight shifts.

And somewhere in this trajectory a trigger event will occur that cannot be managed. A mass casualty attack. A riot that becomes an insurrection. A video so barbaric it breaks the remaining political consensus around managed silence. After that the response will be less controlled, less proportionate and less reversible than anything a government could have delivered by acting fifteen years earlier when the choice still existed.

Britain is not sleepwalking into this. The eyes are wide open. The trajectory is known. The choices being made are deliberate. Every week that passes without a closed border, a functioning removal system and an honest political reckoning is a week in which the future described above becomes more certain and less avoidable.

Belfast on Monday night is not a warning. The warnings came years ago and were ignored. Belfast on Monday night is the bill beginning to arrive.

[Aris Roussinos @arisroussinos]

After taking this photo of burned out houses in East Belfast, two local lads scrolled through my phone photo library to ensure I hadn’t captured any faces, telling me “with no animosity, like” to “fuck away off before you get kneecapped”

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

Això mateix està passant a CAT amb el molt més oblidable procés:

La batalla central de les properes dècades és el nativisme.

Preservar la continuïtat històrica catalana com a cavall de batalla dels autòctons.

La gramàtica del procés només distreu per fer de geriàtric boomer.

[Mike Jones @technopopulist]

Prediction: Sinn Féin will lose much of its support among Catholics in Northern Ireland over the next parliament, and the old unionist–nationalist divide will pretty much fade. Sure, there will be bitter nostalgia about the Troubles, and the graffiti murals will be kept in pristine condition, and people will still fly the Irish and British flags. You’ll still occasionally hear songs about Bobby Sands. But ultimately, both sides will converge in opposition to the Brahmin Left and its bureaucratic machine.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

La visita del Papa psyopitzada pel PSOE i l'agenda 2030 s'està convertint en una subhasta de peix.

Com que s'ha vist tan clarament que la bula papal està comprada, ara tothom s'hi atreveix.

Catalunya és una nació cristiana. Però mai no hem fet seguidisme del vaticà. Ara, menys.

[Comuns @SomComuns]

"Al Papa li demanem que parli amb totes les víctimes dels abusos sexuals dins l’Església catòlica, que es comprometi amb el català i que parli d’habitatge i de la necessitat de posar límits a l’acumulació de patrimoni."

@Ciddavid

[Auctor @n30n5223434]

Proportion of working population in industry around the year 1930 in Europe

[Anna Punsoda Ricart @PunsodaRicart]

No us passa que veient tots aquests numerets papals de sobte enteneu per què Catalunya ha sigut històricament el bressol de l'anarquisme, el republicanisme, del lliurepensament i avui en dia la regió més secularitzada d'Europa? És que per l'amor de Déu.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

@alvaro_gp80 El motiu pel qual són aquí és literalment per genocidar la població autòctona. Això cal explicar-ho bé.

Si la motivació fos merament cultural o econòmica el sistema de tràfic de persones s'hauria organitzat de manera diferent.

La violència que estan aconseguint era l'objectiu.

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

La immigració massiva i invasiva és un crim de guerra: cal retre comptes amb qui l'ha perpetrat.

Recordarem també qui l'ha habilitat i cercat excuses mentre la nostra gent era assassinada: ja no podeu fingir desconèixer els seus efectes.

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

African migrant just tried to behead a white man in North Belfast, Ireland. Video is too graphic to post.

[Enric Vila @enricvd]

The Sagrada Família was built to reconnect Catalonia with God, not to serve as a cover for Spain’s political crisis.

My piece on Gaudí, the Pope, and the language of a temple that was never meant to decorate Madrid’s old lies.

https://t.co/DPbUVw5UIZ

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

@Muzunguito Les companyes decapitadores també són persones! Cap decapitadora és il·legal!

[Berenguer d'Entença Cibernètic @CyberEntenca]

Violència n'hi ha hagut sempre etc.

Els junkies dels 80 ja practicaven intents de decapitació a ple carrer i tal.

Tampoc sabem les condicions socioeconòmiques del decapitador, així que potser és ell la víctima.

Potser el decapitat el va mirar malament, amb intenció racista!

[End Wokeness @EndWokeness]

African migrant just tried to behead a white man in North Belfast, Ireland. Video is too graphic to post.