Kyiv. Civilians try to escape the fire after a Russian drone struck the National Academy of Sciences.
The drone that carried out the strike was built mostly from Chinese components.
Meanwhile, the EU is lifting sanctions on Russian oligarchs.
The US President is asking that Russian oil refineries not be attacked.
The world has gone mad.
And soon this hell will come to other countries too. Because unpunished evil always grows.
RUSSIAN FORCES ARE BLOCKING OLESHKY, UKRAINE, RIGHT NOW. HUMANITARIAN AID IS BEING DESTROYED. PEOPLE ARE LEFT WITHOUT FOOD, MEDICINE, AND BASIC SUPPLIES.
PEOPLE ARE DYING FROM HUNGER AND ILLNESS.
@Iskra873418 then maybe go and say the same thing to those pro-paIestinian and pro-russian accounts instead of terrorising ukrainians who immediately noticed their disingenuous views? the only people you lecture in that discourse are ukrainians for some reason
@redhead_ophelia мене в цьому реплаї дивує, що авторка відео його лайкнула, хоча сама зробила критику про «політичних нердів», які не знають нічого окрім палестини?? абсолютна відірваність від реальності
@dastardlyvillen thats not how the genocide is defined as a term btw. russia participates in all stages of genocide, yall just don’t care.
https://t.co/nfKXta8fMA
@LucilleFilm it was her first and last time mentioning paIestine and showcasing her “position” btw but this virtue signalling was enough for yall to put her on some pedestal. stan twitter activists and zara were created for each other
@danzo_fs майже 300k лайків, коли пости про обстріл росіянами складів з їжею чи енергетики, пости про голод в Олешках не набирають і 1/4 такої активності. я хуєю з цього світу
@htnlcayh genuinely, but isn’t defying women solely through the social construct is anti-feministic too? I mean, gender was created to subjugate, so accepting that view point as the only acceptable one would be agreeing with misogynistic definition of a woman and reduce them to stereotype?
@ksatexodus I know, that’s why i am asking op where’s the line between “poking fun” and “making fun” is, if the *joke* in this context is just a marginalised and objectified female body existing
@QueerNerdyLefty but that would make sense if they were making fun of stereotypes and not female bodies just existing? how can you poke fun at a body without accidentally making fun of something that is already marginalised? does that allow them to make fun of vaginas/periods too for example?