INTERNET COMPUTER GOES DEFLATIONARY AS MISSION 70 KICKS IN
@dfinity's Mission 70 governance proposal, which passed with 53%+ support, is now actively cutting $ICP's annual inflation by up to 70%, dropping the rate from 9.72% to between 2.92% and 5.42% by year-end.
The mechanism has teeth. 20% of all revenue from the upcoming Cloud Engines product will permanently burn $ICP, with another 80% routed to node providers. NNS voting rewards have been capped, and node provider incentives restructured to align with actual usage.
With Cloud Engines demoing May 10 and the deflationary engine already running, $ICP's setup is shifting from "speculative AI compute play" to "tokens burned per unit of enterprise revenue."
@dominic_w I'm really fed up with seeing constant -% on my wallet, you're giving me breathing problems from the anxiety, I don't want to have thrown all my youth on you and lose all my work. Do something please. It's not fucking possible.
Internet Computer unlocked secure onchain sovereign cloud. https://t.co/c91gCXdahA unlocked creating 100% onchain apps using AI chat. All while other networks only process tokens. ICP stands unique. Soon, cloud engines, and verifiable LLM inference. Real tech inflection coming...
I genuinely believe the next MULTI-BILLION-DOLLAR COIN in crypto is coming soon.
Not a meme.
Not a gamble.
A revolution.
The NVIDIA of crypto.
A coin that drags the entire market vertical.
Just like NVIDIA took the S&P 500 to new highs.
A coin that runs from $0 -> $500B in months.
A coin that fuses AI + Crypto into one unstoppable force.
I don’t know its name yet,
but I can feel it.
Just like $LUNA hit $100B last cycle,
this time it’ll be an AI coin leading the next era.
And when it runs, it won’t stop.
It will take crypto to new heights.
It’ll redefine history.
I bet on $ICP as the World Computer crypto software stack
The thing about Internet Computer is not hype, not narrative, not “next ETH” talk.
It’s architecture.
While most chains focus on token logic and outsource everything else, ICP flips the model. The full stack lives on-chain — backend, frontend, data, identity. Not theoretical, not “soon”, but already running.
That changes the game.
Because once software itself becomes a smart contract — not just the financial layer — you remove the dependency on centralized infrastructure. No AWS, no traditional cloud choke points, no gatekeepers. Code is served directly from the protocol. Deterministic, tamper-resistant, cryptographically secured end-to-end.
That’s not incremental. That’s a different category.
Developers don’t just deploy tokens — they deploy full applications. Native web apps, running from the blockchain, with direct user interaction. No bridges, no wrappers, no fake decentralization layers.
And this is where your AI point actually hits:
AI lowers the barrier to creation → ICP removes the barrier to deployment.
Anyone who can think + prompt + iterate can ship software that is:
•globally accessible
•censorship-resistant
•monetizable by design
Not by plugging into Web2 rails — but by default within the protocol.
Cycles instead of gas abstractions. Reverse gas model. Users don’t need wallets just to interact. That’s UX solving a real bottleneck, not just theory.
And identity matters here:
Internet Identity removes passwords, replaces them with cryptographic authentication tied to devices. Native, seamless, no friction. That’s infrastructure solving real-world problems.
Interoperability isn’t ignored either:
Direct integration paths with Bitcoin and Ethereum — not via wrapped assets, but protocol-level interactions. That’s how you extend ecosystems without fragmenting liquidity or trust.
So fundamentally, ICP is not trying to be:
“another chain”
It’s trying to be:
the environment where software lives.
⸻
And here’s the uncomfortable truth:
Most projects tokenize ideas.
ICP tokenizes execution.
⸻
If AI continues its exponential curve — speed, cost, output quality — then the bottleneck becomes:
Where does that software live?
Who controls it?
Who captures the value?
If the answer is still Big Tech clouds, nothing changes.
If the answer is fully on-chain infrastructure,
then yeah — things get interesting.
Not because of hype.
Because the stack actually allows it.