I was very happy to vote for Ed Gallrein today.
The idea that this vote was bought is absurd.
It was because I had no desire to continue to support Massie who has voted against the GOP 33% of the time.
🚨 JUST IN: Ed Gallrein goes FULL MAGA MODE in his VICTORY speech over Rep. Thomas Massie
"I want to THANK President Trump...thank you, Mr. President!" 🇺🇸
"For his support, his endorsement, and his counsel as I navigated this campaign."
Incoming January 2027!
Leftists are enraged by the spectacle yesterday. They are calling us Christian nationalists. They say that we want to usher in a new era of Christian nationalism. They claim that we are more radicalized than we’ve ever been. And they’re 100 percent correct on all counts.
Anyone else notice that when one of our heroes was assinated in cold blood if front of thousands of people including his wife and young kids that not a single store in America had to board up their windows?
That tell us everything you need to know.
I’ve found another good defamation lawsuit for the estate of Charlie Kirk to bring
Charlie was *none* of the things this headline falsely accuses him of being
Who else finds this reprehensible?
Utah Governor Spencer Cox: "I want you to look at how Utahns reacted the last two nights. There was NO rioting, no looting, no cars set on fire. There was no violence. There were vigils and prayers."
In the wake of Charlie's assassination, many people are demanding that we redouble our devotion to the "free marketplace of ideas." The call seems at first glance courageous and noble. In reality, it is reckless and impractical. We had an open marketplace of ideas; the Left shot it up.
Not only have extreme leftists committed violence in the marketplace of ideas; more scandalous still, mainstream left-wing voices have cheered and made light of the violence. There can be no open marketplace—of ideas or anything else—under such conditions.
Marketplaces require rules, confidence, and common media of exchange. They require, in other words, order. Liberty requires order. One cannot be both free and undisciplined, for instance, or free and ignorant. We know this philosophically, and we also know it intuitively. It's why we don't let toddlers vote.
What we require now is the reassertion of order. We must insist upon the acceptance of basic truths and moral goods, not as the asymptotic goal of endless debate but as the axiomatic foundation without which debate cannot occur. We must foreclose certain antisocial behaviors and suicidal ideologies. We must, to borrow a phrase from Chesterton, stop "the thought that stops thought."
In practical terms, this means we must stigmatize certain evil ideas and behaviors, and we must ostracize people who insist upon them. More practically, this means that people who persist in such disorder should lose their social standing. In certain cases, they should lose their jobs. There must be consequences.
With any political reform, it is wise to err on the side of caution. The offenses that merit such ostracism should be particularly egregious. A good place to begin would be with those who celebrate the murder of an innocent man.
We thought so much more of you @StephenKing and even though this may harm us financially we’re removing all your books from our website.
Absolute abhorrent and ill informed comment in the first instance that an inchoate apology doesn’t begin to cover.
Go further.
These are difficult days for our country. We must live out our faith and principles—even in disagreement—and commit to open dialogue. We are better than this as a nation, and we should challenge each other to a higher level of civility.