Lula afirma que está muito triste com a decisão dos Estados Unidos de classificar “nossos criminosos” como terroristas.
Nossos? Seus criminosos, Lula.
Esta na hora de se aposentar.
As an Iranian who stayed connected through Starlink during the total internet blackout, I want to wholeheartedly confirm what President Trump just said:
"The Iranian people want to be free. They have lived in a world that you know NOTHING about."
For 47 years, my people have endured systematic torture, rape, murder, humiliation, anxiety, suppression, and grief under the Islamic Republic. It’s been a long, grinding suffering — punctuated by brutal spikes like the January protests, mass executions, and now war. The world has no idea of the scale or depth of these horrors. Only when this evil regime finally falls will the full truth pour out — in quality and quantity that will shock humanity.
We have now reached a point where almost no cost is too great if it rids us of this regime. Because the cost of it staying in power is infinitely higher.
If you’re reading this and you can’t understand how any Iranian could feel relief at their own country losing a war and getting bombed… I envy you. You have never lived what we have lived. You have never watched your people, friends, family, and loved ones get tortured, raped, or killed almost daily and over half a century. You have never seen an entire nation slowly but brutally suffocated like this.
We tried every alternative imaginable: massive protests, dissent, peaceful reform, negotiations — everything. None of it worked. The regime’s answer has always been bullets, gallows, and more terror.
Now, less than 24 hours before Trump’s deadline, I write this with a heavy heart from inside Iran:
Whatever happens next — if there is still an Iran left to save and this regime is gone — the Iranian people will be happy with the result. No matter the cost. Because the cost of the regime remaining is higher, and for many of us, death itself is preferable to another day under this nightmare.
This is the true sentiment of the majority of Iranians — the voice of a people who often have no internet, no platform, and no way to be heard.
The world will soon understand why we say:
Anything to be free. Anything to end this evil.
#IranMassacre
#IranRevolution2026
JUST IN: France refused to share its optronics with the UAE. China shared its optronics with Iran. On April 3, the version that was shared brought down an American fighter jet. The version that was withheld could have helped detect the threat. The knowledge flowed to the attacker and was denied to the defender. The entire architecture of Western defence cooperation just inverted in a single afternoon.
The UAE withdrew from co-financing the Rafale F5, France’s next-generation fighter upgrade. The programme costs €5 billion. Abu Dhabi had offered €3.5 billion in exchange for access to the “black box” technologies at the heart of the aircraft, specifically the optronics systems: the passive electro-optical and infrared sensors that detect, track, and identify targets without emitting a signal. France said no. Paris will now fund the entire programme alone, with delays expected. The negotiations collapsed during a meeting between Macron and Mohammed bin Zayed in Abu Dhabi in December 2025. The optronics were the breaking point.
Optronics is the word connecting two stories nobody has placed in the same sentence. The technology France refused to share with its closest Gulf partner is the same class of technology Iran used to shoot down an F-15E Strike Eagle. Passive electro-optical and infrared detection. No radar emissions. No warning to the pilot. The Chinese tutorial published March 14 described the technique. The Iranian layered system, integrating Russian S-300 with Chinese EO/IR trackers and Iranian Raad missiles, executed it on April 3. The “black box” France kept locked is the same physics China gave away for the cost of a social media post.
France kept the secret. China published the tutorial. Iran built the weapon. And the UAE defends itself with THAAD and Patriot batteries that rely on active radar, the systems passive detection was designed to circumvent. Habshan caught fire twice from intercepted debris. Abu Dhabi’s three bridges are on the IRGC’s target list. The optronics that might have given the UAE an edge in detecting incoming threats are locked in a French vault because Paris valued sovereignty over its partner’s survival.
The same week, Trump’s sons arrived in Abu Dhabi to pitch Powerus, their drone defence company, to the government France just refused. Sheikh Tahnoon, who runs the UAE’s national security and invested $500 million in Trump’s cryptocurrency, sat across the table. The ally that could not buy French optronics is being sold American drones by the family of the President whose war created the threat the optronics were designed to counter.
The molecule does not care about defence procurement. It cares about the strait that is closed, the gas plant on fire, the bridges on the list, and the shield that works on radar while the enemy learns to kill with heat. France kept its technology sovereign and lost its partner. China made its technology free and armed the adversary. The war is being decided by which approach produces results faster: the one that protects the secret or the one that shares the equation.
The equation won. The secret is still in the vault. The F-15E is in a crater. And the ally who wanted the technology that might have changed the outcome is watching its gas plant burn while the President’s sons pitch the replacement across the table from a man who bought half a billion dollars of their cryptocurrency.
https://t.co/dAOBBMsgDS
It’s been a month since Iran’s regime
started attacking UAE. Today they
lost it & fired 20 ballistic missiles
+ 37 drones !!
UAE defenses downed them all.
Total attacks: 2,285 in one month.
They want to crush us
because we stand for tolerance
the opposite of their terrorism🇦🇪
🗣️ "You can't bully your neighbours."
UAE minister of state for international cooperation Reem Al-Hashimy tells @SkyYaldaHakim no country should hold the Strait of Hormuz "hostage".
Much of the world's oil supply flows through the narrow waterway.
🚨🚨🚨🚨
UAE warning
Sultan Ahmed Al Jaber, CEO of Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC):
Any Iranian threat to ADNOC’s infrastructure or to navigation in the Strait of Hormuz will force the world to pay an economic price.
Sultan Al Jaber is considered one of the most prominent global figures in the energy sector and the energy transition.
كل عام وأمهاتنا جميعا بخير.. كل عام والأم مصدر للثقة .. ومدرسة للأجيال .. وصانعة للقيم ..
وتحية تقدير وامتنان لأمهات الشهداء .. وأمهات الأبطال في ساحات التضحية .. وأمهات الرجال والنساء الذي يصنعون الفرق كل يوم في أوطاننا ..
حفظ الله الإمارات .. وحفظ الله الأمهات في كل ركن من أركان الإمارات .
#يوم_الأم
🇧🇷 Brazilian politician Fabiana Bolsonaro performed blackface to protest the appointment of trans lawmaker Erika Hilton to an anti-racism commission.
Her argument: “I am painted black on the outside. I identify as black. So why can’t I preside over the anti-racism commission?
Because I am not black.”
Source: @CollinRugg
Tehran has targeted civilian infrastructure despite the UAE calling for de-escalation and saying its territory would not be used to attack Iran, Reem Al Hashimy said.
دعاء بصوت صاحب السمو الشيخ الدكتور سلطان بن محمد القاسمي حاكم الشارقة
" اللهم اني أودعتك هذه البلد ، اللهم احفظ نساءها و ابنائها ، و اسكن فيها الاخيار و ابعد عنها الاشرار "
#الامارات#جبل_علي#الفجيرة#دبي#أبوظبي
من أعطى النظام في ايران الحق في الاعتداء على الإمارات ودول الخليج؟
أي قانون دولي يسمح لكم بإطلاق الصواريخ على دولة ذات سيادة؟
وأي مبدأ أخلاقي يبرر استهداف مدن يسكنها ملايين المدنيين؟
وأي تفسير للدين الإسلامي يمكن أن يعطي شرعية لضرب دولة مسلمة آمنة لم تعتدِ عليكم؟
القانون الدولي واضح في هذه المسألة.
ميثاق الأمم المتحدة يحرّم استخدام القوة ضد الدول الأخرى إلا في حال الدفاع عن النفس أو بقرار من مجلس الأمن.
أما إطلاق الصواريخ على المدن والمطارات والموانئ والمصالح الاقتصادية فهو، وفق القانون الدولي الإنساني، اعتداء على دولة ذات سيادة وتعريض مباشر للمدنيين للخطر.
ثم إن محاولة تبرير ضرب دولة ما بحجة وجود قواعد عسكرية أمريكية أو علاقات مع دولة أخرى ليس مقبولا في العلاقات الدولية.
فلو كان هذا المنطق صحيحاً، لأصبح نصف العالم هدفاً مشروعاً للحروب، لأن عشرات الدول لديها تحالفات أو اتفاقيات دفاعية مع قوى كبرى.
الإمارات دولة اختارت منذ تأسيسها طريق التنمية والانفتاح والتعايش.. مدنها ليست ساحات حرب، بل مدن يعيش فيها الناس من أكثر من مئتي جنسية بسلام.
فأي شرعية قانونية، وأي شرعية أخلاقية، وأي شرعية دينية تمنح أي جهة الحق في أن تقصف دولة لم تعتدِ عليها؟