they too busy calling black people who live in america imperialist settlers to actually acknowledge the violence directed towards those who are internally colonized
As someone who isn't afraid of conflict or direct disagreement, one of my boundaries this year is not being the only one who initiates conversations all the time. Its been helpful.
Their beef is that they can’t hide their transphobia behind “bisexual” anymore.
I’m not saying that all bisexuals are transphobic.
What I will say is that *I* identify with pansexuality because I wanted to be clear that I’m for everybody.
genuinely asking, what is people’s beef with “pansexual” as an identifier?
if some heter, homo, and bisexual people can still be transphobic/exclusionary, wouldn’t it make sense to have a term that’s trans-inclusive? or am i missing something
Rarely have I actually met a bisexual who follows the “bisexuality has always been inclusionary to trans folks” definition.
Also, words mean things and bisexuality has always included (cis)binary genders only.
I’ve been feeling an urge to be more transparent about how serious this ask of help is.
So here’s a little more openness and vulnerability!
(Please clap for me chile. I cried doing this.🥹🥹)