DaletN

Science.

Mathematics.

High Performance Computing.

Quantum Artificial Intelligence.

EdTech.

May truth and justice prevail.

🇺🇸 ✡️ 🦁 🌄

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

As AI takes over, the new human condition will be to imitate AI and prove that you're not human.

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

Listen here you ugly, fat piece of shit. The data is crystal clear: you are a cuckold faggot. You are busy here defending blacks, who are provably more violent by the data. I suggest you fuck off.

-----
The data consistently shows higher rates of violent offending among Black Americans relative to their share of the population (roughly 13–14%). This is not an absolute claim about every individual, and large variation exists within every group, but the group-level disparities in official statistics are large and longstanding.[](<https://t.co/CXMCBajOgA>)

FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) data for 2024 show Black individuals accounted for about 43% of arrests for violent crimes overall and 58% of arrests for murder and nonnegligent manslaughter (5,341 of 9,215 known-race arrests). White individuals (including many Hispanics in racial tallies) made up 53% of violent crime arrests and 39% of murder arrests. Per-capita arrest rates for murder have typically run 6–8 times higher for Black Americans than White Americans in recent years.[](<https://t.co/Vpy8Cu3vG0>)

These patterns are not solely an artifact of policing. The Bureau of Justice Statistics’ National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS), which relies on victim reports rather than arrests, has long found Black offenders overrepresented in nonfatal violent incidents. In 2018 data, Black people were identified as about 29% of violent-crime offenders (and 35% in incidents reported to police) versus 13% of the population; later NCVS summaries place the share of violent incidents involving Black offenders around 25%. Homicide victimization rates further track the disparity: BJS figures for 2025 put the Black rate at 14.6 per 100,000 versus 2.0 for White persons (roughly 7×).[](<https://t.co/MPPsoJbMz6>)

Most homicide is intra-racial. Official sources have repeatedly documented elevated Black-on-Black offending and victimization rates for decades. Explanations are multifactorial (age structure, family structure, concentrated poverty, cognitive distributions, cultural patterns, and others), but the raw rate differences themselves appear in arrest, victimization, and mortality data.

[David Toniolo @davidtoniolo]

As a human, I'm concerned about everyone's belief that money solves problems.

Across U.S. states, raw per-pupil spending has virtually zero linear correlation with K–12 academic outcomes:

- 50 States Ranked by K-12 Performance (2024 NAEP) vs. Spending/Pupil (FY24 Census) State-level correlation (spending vs G4 reading): r = +0.09 (R² < 1%)

- Spending vs. 2023–24 High School Graduation Rate (AFGR): Pearson r = −0.086 across the 50 states (r= −0.211, Spearman ρ= −0.075 when including D.C.)

- Two-decade trend (2003–2022): 36 states increased inflation-adjusted per-pupil spending while seeing declines in both 8th-grade NAEP math and reading, while only 6 states turned higher spending into gains in both subjects.

Perf | State | Spend/Pupil (Spend Rank)
1. MA | $24,429 (#5)
2. NJ | $27,234 (#3)
3. NH | $22,978 (#7)
4. UT | $11,347 (#49)
5. WY | $20,521 (#14)
6. IN | $13,622 (#40)
7. CO | $15,908 (#27)
8. CT | $26,316 (#4)
9. OH | $17,257 (#21)
10. MN | $17,098 (#24)
11. WI | $15,952 (#26)
12. MT | $13,656 (#38)
13. ND | $17,102 (#23)
14t. ID | $11,060 (#50)
14t. SD | $12,828 (#44)
16. TN | $12,882 (#43)
17. PA | $21,091 (#11)
18t. HI | $23,878 (#6)
18t. IL | $21,776 (#10)
20. KY | $14,596 (#34)
21. WA | $18,564 (#17)
22. IA | $14,369 (#35)
23t. FL | $12,693 (#45)
23t. RI | $22,110 (#9)
25. NE | $16,147 (#25)
26. MS | $12,324 (#46)
27. VA | $17,104 (#22)
28. NC | $12,995 (#41)
29. GA | $15,833 (#28)
30. NY | $31,918 (#1)
31. MD | $20,208 (#15)
32t. KS | $15,558 (#31)
32t. VT | $28,818 (#2)
34. LA | $15,581 (#30)
35. TX | $12,895 (#42)
36. SC | $15,060 (#32)
37. MO | $14,241 (#36)
38. MI | $18,314 (#18)
39. ME | $19,962 (#16)
40. CA | $20,791 (#13)
41. AL | $13,627 (#39)
42. NV | $14,812 (#33)
43. AZ | $12,003 (#48)
44. AR | $13,873 (#37)
45. OR | $18,083 (#19)
46. DE | $22,201 (#8)
47. OK | $12,162 (#47)
48. WV | $15,640 (#29)
49. AK | $21,004 (#12)
50. NM | $17,664 (#20)

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@jferguson032 @WilliamHun66548 @papiwontmiss You're blatantly retarded, unable to look at clear data and accept reality. It's always the blacks acting like unhinged violent animals. And it's always Muslims responsible for terrorism. Quit being a slack-jawed chubby-faced, cuckold faggot, disgracing your ancestors. Fuck you.

[Dr. Maalouf ‏ @realMaalouf]

DISGUSTING: The U.N. has just elected the Islamic Republic of Iran to its committee responsible for shaping the agenda on human rights, women’s rights, and counterterrorism.

144 countries voted in favor.

The United Nations has become a complete joke.

[ΛRMIN @Arminn_Ai]

Jensen Huang in the Matrix, learning how Chinese spies work

Wait till the end 👀

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@nicolaisagasser I've been building my own black hole simulation with CC... was wondering if we had overlap. Following meow.

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@nicolaisagasser Have you been prompting about Interstellar? Anything specific to general relativity? It looks cool, but how physically accurate does it claim to be? Is it just a 3js visual?

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@Lazarus38611569 @ltgiv @elonmusk When we're at that level of abundance, why not take a customer's design of their own car -- make it functional and safe and road worthy -- and build it?

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@prof_g I like thinking about sheaves as the northern lights over the arctic

[prof-g @prof_g]

the chapter lead figs in Elementary Applied Topology are amalgams of mathematical & literary images, sprinkled with my own pet theories on literature. this one, from "Sheaves" is based on the Inferno. there are three famous episodes of a pair of sinners, trapped:
* francesca & paolo : in wind
* ulysses & diomede : in flame
* ugolino & ruggieri : in ice
the sins & the sinners get progressively worse...
to this i added a fourth -- dante & virgil : in earth, then past satan, descending/ascending to escape up to the final image of stars...
this is a satisfying mapping onto the 4 elements (+ quintessence). did dante intend this? not clear, but it's a pretty clear pattern once you see it...

[Valerio Capraro @ValerioCapraro]

It’s getting surreal.

A mathematician on X announced a solution to one of the most beautiful and elegant problems in mathematics. I’ll keep him anonymous. You’ll see why in a moment.

Is ℤ Diophantine in ℚ? In other words, can a single polynomial equation pick out exactly the integers among the rational numbers?

Equations like these go back to the ancient Greeks. This particular question has been open for decades. There are good reasons to expect the answer to be no. Surprisingly, the proposed answer is yes.

So, what’s the problem?

The problem is that the author candidly says in the post “I don’t have the expertise to understand this solution”, but he posts it anyway as he has “high confidence” on it.

The proof doesn’t even have the formal Lean verification.

This is literally an AI generated proof that looks plausible, but nobody has actually verified.

This is exactly what we call Epistemia. The argument looks plausible, and plausibility takes the place of verification.

Until recently, a mathematician would be embarrassed to announce a proof he couldn’t understand.

Now it risks becoming the norm.

I think this is partly due to short term incentives.

Announcements like this get you thousands of followers and interviews with journalists. (Now you know why I’m keeping him anonymous.)

Epistemia is already a big issue.

It’s a tragedy that short-term incentives - Andy Warhol’s 15 minutes of fame - are pushing people to become even more sick.

*
In the first comment, you’ll find our epistemological fault lines paper, where we discuss Epistemia at length. I think it’s useful to understand what’s happening.

[andrew blinn in NYC @disconcision]

Drag-and-drop makes the digital graspable, but building it well is fiddly enough that many don’t bother. Declarative Dragging (with Josh Horowitz &amp; Jeff Heer, #uist2026 best paper award), lets you make an element draggable just by listing the states dragging it can reach.

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@prof_g Kuhl. I'd like to start on a book then too.

[Ash Crypto @AshCrypto]

$2.5 Trillion erased from the US stock market in 60 minutes as Democrats call to ban AI.

Bro that’s the entire market cap of crypto.

[Amjad Taha أمجد طه @amjadt25]

When a Muslim Brotherhood member wins a Senate race, that’s NOT DEMOCRACY; that’s USEFUL IDIOTS hating their own country. When the mullahs in Iran took over, socialists helped them, and later, the Islamists killed them all. This is the most dangerous moment for Western civilization. GOD BLESS AMERICA.
U.S. Senate candidate Abdul El-Sayed is a dark chapter in this great nation’s history.

And as the Bible warns:
“For whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap.” — Galatians 6:7 (KJV)
Be careful what you plant in the name of democracy. You may not enjoy the harvest.

[David Toniolo @davidtoniolo]

Don't typically share Nick videos. Here he's stating something that's absolutely true.

Your competition is not all people.... in any domain. Most people - the overwhelming majority of people - are not real competition. They don't work, they don't consistently show up, they don't dedicate themselves to actually learning their craft, and they aren't prepared to do anything without rewards for a very long time.

You are not competing against the world. You're only competing against a very very small subset of the population. And fortunately, there are so many different interests in the world there's not that much competition in any domain.

To my indie devs looking to build the 1,000,000th ai-marketing-whatever-scheduler... It is not a dumb idea. Because you likely have 500,000,000 potential customers and there are only 100 competitors that are actually placed to get any of those. And believe me. Breaking in that 100 will earn you more money than you ever set out to make.

Be consistent. Work hard. Show up every day regardless of how you feel. LEARN! ACTUALLY COMMIT TO LEARNING.

((I should define for you what learning means.... it's not reading, listening or watching information. That's not learning. Learning is when new information CHANGES your FUTURE behaviours. **That is learning.** How many people that you know ACTUALLY learn by this definition?))

Anyways, enough of a ramble.

Everyone's shit. You should assume 99% of the people that say they're really hungry and are going to do a thing aren't really trying. There is no competition. Just go out there and win and never be put of by fear of "competition".

[Elon Musk @elonmusk]

@broudsov You are fully retarded

[Eric S. Raymond @esrtweet]

I warned you all about this.

They will be lying. The actual goal of the big AI providers will be to outlaw open-source and open-weight AI in order to create a regulatory moat around their business, and have some hope of earning out their astronomical capital expenditures.

The claims will be about safety and equity, the reality will be a money and power grab. Brace for the bullshit avalanche that's coming.

[DaletN @DaletN_ai]

@PsyopAnime This is too hopeful, trusting that these people will wake up and share their energy.