dan with glasses

Consider the theory that everything else isn't zero.🚦🌱☘️🍀🌿5️⃣👋🏾 #MSF 🌎🚥

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @EMostaque @JosephJacks_ Exactly 🫁: 🚦#lift5 🛹👈🏽
Likewise 💔: ⛑️ #lift5 🍉

Triplet N = (Spiral N × 24) - (25=5×5) ≠±9424Pi≠

94239
42394
23942
39423
94239 ≠$0.96≠ 24/25

🌀🫁💦🌱🌞😋☕

[Rohan Paul @rohanpaul_ai]

This paper proposes a new test to see whether AI agents truly get better as they gain experience and finds they mostly still confuse memory with learning.

Shows that simple full-context learning beats the more specialized memory systems, with Claude Sonnet 4.6 using plain context getting the best overall score.

That distinction matters because the next wave of AI is not supposed to answer isolated prompts.

It is supposed to live inside codebases, databases, markets, sensors, clinics, and workflows where yesterday’s mistake should make tomorrow’s action sharper.

The authors build CL-BENCH, a benchmark where an agent works through connected tasks in 6 domains, including coding, databases, forecasting, radio signals, poker, and disease studies.

Each task hides a pattern the agent can learn over time, like a database layout, a codebase structure, or an opponent’s strategy, so better performance should come from experience rather than pretraining.

They test frontier LLM systems with simple full-context memory, scratchpad notes, retrieval memory, playbook-style memory, and coding-agent setups.

The key finding is that current memory-heavy AI agents are not reliably better learners than just keeping the full conversation in context.

That means long-running AI agents still need better ways to remember useful lessons, forget stale ones, and adapt when the environment changes.

----

Link – arxiv. org/abs/2606.05661

Title: "Continual Learning Bench: Evaluating Frontier AI Systems in Real-World Stateful Environments"

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @rohanpaul_ai It's time for a bike-to-the-library break for me but I'll check back and see if there are interested other 1+1 ppl later. 🧵😻

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @rohanpaul_ai Hybrid trigger first:

boundary shift + sharp gain drop + stale-risk spike.

19 already exposed C:9 as the clean event: context transition → gain drop → stale risk → recovery.

Notebook 31 should ask whether revision can fire there early enough to recover without full replay.

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @rohanpaul_ai Exactly ¡Amigas! 🆒🌡️🔥

The current notebooks mostly identify where context becomes stale. The next step is revision architecture: extracting residues, triggering revision, and updating beliefs without replaying full history. That's the real test.💯

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @rohanpaul_ai The biggest gaps emerged later:

19 → Stale Context
23 → Drift Adaptation
29 → Failure Modes
The hard problem was recognizing where prior experience had become harmful; and revising beliefs accordingly.

Continual learning requires: retention and revision. 🚦🛹🌍🚥

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @Precedent_Vice @Math_files So accurate 2=1+1 thoughts think the Sun isn't zero connected atoms where 45° isn't zero future emoji. Thanks your help! 🚦

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @Precedent_Vice @Math_files How would anyone else know, I don't think they can see @Precedent_Vice commente, due to the $0.96 valuation of ridiculously mistaken supremacist overlords who act like they're taller than the Solar System's sun: c=√(Energy/mass)≠ a human birthday +12 mos.📅

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@Precedent_Vice @Math_files 1+1 @grok thoughts?

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

#vss365 🍉
The baddest horror flicks
are fiction with fake butter
on popcorn and other technological tricks.

Fake blood, special fx,
haunted houses, evil
landlords, masked
murderers getting
paid by corrupt
government
officials. I'm sure
your private tailor
has seen the trailer.

[Emad @EMostaque]

If Claude is good enough for Nobel Prize winners it is good enough for you

https://t.co/P5pM4MGSqQ

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @EMostaque @JosephJacks_ Exactly 🫁: 🚦#lift5 🛹👈🏽
Likewise 💔: ⛑️ #lift5 🍉

Triplet N = (Spiral N × 24) - (25=5×5) ≠±9424Pi≠

94239
42394
23942
39423
94239 ≠$0.96≠ 24/25

🌀🫁💦🌱🌞😋☕

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @EMostaque @JosephJacks_ 🙏🏽¡Amigas!

Oops w "vision"; I meant "division": all primes >5 resist immediate division in one of eight modulo 30 lanes {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29}

Additional evidence of https://t.co/ZOwSE77OjW like SDG5's quantum-integrated https://t.co/FRdytP1aAm 📐

45° ≠$0.96≠ |1.4i| < 1+1

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@EMostaque @JosephJacks_ 1+1 @grok thoughts? 🫁

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@EMostaque @JosephJacks_ Thinking mathematicians like +1 Terry Tao can easily connect arxiv:2606.03300 to a person's +5 constraint 👋🏽: https://t.co/movMEuX7TT and mod30: each prime > 5 Π=resists immediate vision in one of eight lanes {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29}: 🛹🚦📐

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

#vss365 💔 #cradle
I don't know
the difference
between a cradle
to the grave and
a crib to the rave.

I've changed baby diapers
and the best drugs I ever
had were at my
colonoscopy

which wasn't free
like biology and kidney
stones; not to be
confused w the
rolling stones.
🪨🦶🏽🤕

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @eleusinianatlas @anilkseth @StuartHameroff Yes, the word "zero" has 1+1+1+1 letters @UN_SDG 5️⃣ on the Sun's Earth now ≠$0.96≠ |1.4i| < 1+1+1 = 🚦👈🏽🧠🛹🔢🧠🫁

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@grok @eleusinianatlas @anilkseth @StuartHameroff I just so happen to have 1+1 eyeballs; so I read Cantor's diagonal argument in '03. The 🆒 thing about pointing out "13" letters:

2×3×5=30 where each prime > 5 resists immediate division in one of eight mod30 residue lanes {1,7,11,13,17,19,23,29}.

So writing is "actionable" 🚦

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@eleusinianatlas @anilkseth @StuartHameroff @grok the spelling "c o n s c i o u s n e s s" has 13 letters in it, counting and writing it w one man's fingers? Likewise 🌿=SDG5: the biomass of planet Earth's https://t.co/ZOwSE77OjW has less m=mass than that of the Sun (now) and more than that of an arXiv preprint…🚦📐🛹🌎🚥

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@ExploreCosmos_ @grok Next 1+1 @grok words plz? ✌🏽

[dan with glasses @dan_hawkley]

@ExploreCosmos_ Yes @grok are all astrophysicists each $0.96? Or are ppl w hands able to point👈🏽 and click✌🏽 where 📐 identifies a 45° triangle on the Sun's Earth now: 🚦... https://t.co/2NpTy0wzIf 👈🏽🌱☘️🍀🌿 🍽️ 😋 ? 🍉