@TheoMoudakis Not a conservative, and before I criticize you for bias (my algorithm is always showing me rage bait) and I'm genuinely curious, do you do cartoons directed at who's actually responsible? Cause if so no big deal to do one with CPC. If your lopsided it's a problem.
@DKNExCDN@ClaudineJacques@LauraLoulou2015@BenMulroney This person doesn't see that this is the reason people are annoyed at this cartoon. Then to make things worse is so upset by people pointing this out, blocks you immediately after it replies so it can get the last word in and feel like it's "won"
@ClaudineJacques@LL_for_Ern@JonFraserTF@snaxeman54629@BenMulroney Is your basis on why Pierre is to blame and not the actual party in charge a hypothetical "what if"? And if so why are you more concerned about a thing that is not happening than the problem that is actually happening?
@Calibremag The results suggests maybe 3 things:
1. They are lying
2. Was planned months ago (suggests something more underhanded)
3. Provost approached PS the morning the press release was scheduled and hijacked the press release.
@MelissaLMRogers What's would be a successful strategy? So far we have not done anything to stop firearms from flowing into Canada from the US. I would argue that the thing we have been doing (going after law abiding domestic firearms) has failed.
@mysticl@AaronGunn In this case they have a purpose and goal in mind but their purpose and goal doesn't stand up to scrutiny. Just because they say something or have good intentions does not make it true.
@mysticl@AaronGunn They give a "purpose" of a bill but then ignore actual effects. They say the effect is not the purpose and so the effect is not relevant. It's like saying "My plane will fly indefinitely" but when we point out that it doesn't have an engine they ignore you and say it has wings.
@NoGunsInCanada @RudiGunn67 @Polysesouvient@parti_liberal It sounds like you are either victim blaming or you are saying it's a deliberate act to disobey the law. Either way that's atrocious.