Dan

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Olena018wvm Farrah Fawcett

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Damaan4u33 Yes

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@elonupdate657 E

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Summertc6 Did he really kill Charlie Kirk. Or was he put up to it?

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@iTONYTM ABSOLUTELY.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@michaelt5656 Can’t answer that. With now a days thinking from these MAGA DIRT BAGS
OF TRUMP- I don’t have the time and patience to put up with phony charges of violence.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

1ST AMENDMENT-RELIGION CLAUSES

The United States Constitution protects your right to practice your faith and choose where to worship primarily through the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from establishing an official state religion or interfering with your personal religious practices. [1, 2]
The Constitution protects these rights through two specific parts of the First Amendment, known collectively as the Religion Clauses

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Zack_magaig As rational and clear-thinking people, we agree with Jane and feel ashamed of America.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@DonaldTrumpJrQ2 MAN AGGRAVATING QUESTION NO NEED TO BE ROCKET SCIENTIST I CHOSE E

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Sofia50020Sofia The YETTI cooler.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@MattPinner_ I would go for the letter C

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Fatima_30e Yes. Remember God is watching.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@madisonclaccy9 AH 5,000.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

NO, Clarifying the Facts in the Meme
While public criticism of her lenient sentence is widespread, the viral meme contains a significant chronological error:
•The Meme's Claim: It states that the judge freed a violent convict fearing prison was "too hard," and that he "then killed an elder."
•The Actual Timeline: Watson did not kill anyone after being released by Judge Colfax. The fatal assault occurred first, in January 2021. Judge Colfax's controversial decision to grant him probation happened at his final sentencing years later, after he had already been convicted of the crime. [1, 3]
The demand for impeachment or a recall is a political and symbolic expression of public anger against "soft-on-crime" judicial philosophies rather than a formal legal proceeding for an ongoing public threat.

[Dan @DanTjustme]

NO,the principle of maintaining a single, uniform legal system based strictly on the Constitution applies directly to the President of the United States and the entire executive branch.
Under Article II of the U.S. Constitution, the President takes a mandatory oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States." This means that the President, like the courts and Congress, cannot enforce or operate under any rules, executive orders, or foreign/religious frameworks that violate constitutional boundaries.

The Limits of Presidential Power Under the Constitution
While a President serves as the head of the executive branch, their actions are strictly bound by the following constitutional principles:
•The Supremacy Clause: Article VI establishes that the U.S. Constitution is the "supreme Law of the Land." No presidential action, federal law, or religious code can override it.
•Separation of Powers: The President does not have the power to write or alter laws independently; that authority belongs strictly to Congress.
•Judicial Review: If a President enacts a policy or issues an executive order that oversteps constitutional boundaries, the federal court system has the authority to declare that action unconstitutional and strike it down.

The Debate in Context
The core debate surrounding a proposed ban on Sharia law centers on how this constitutional standard should be maintained:
•Proponents of a Ban argue that explicit federal legislation is a necessary, proactive step to reaffirm that the Constitution is the sole legal authority, ensuring no alternative legal systems ever gain a foothold in public governance.
•Opponents of a Ban argue that such legislation is redundant because the Constitution already prevents any outside law—including Sharia—from superseding American law, meaning the President and the courts are already constitutionally barred from recognizing it.
Ultimately, the baseline requirement remains identical for everyone: the Constitution is the final authority, and the President is legally bound to uphold it above all else.
If you are interested, we can look closer at how executive orders are checked by the courts, or explore the specific constitutional checks and balances that limit presidential power. What would you like to focus on next?

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@PatriotMike15 Macoroni

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Barontrumpwill This for sure i’ll agree with Baron. Change it. AMERICAN Flag and State Flag. I don’t support LGBTQ+

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@muhammadtalha93 B

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@Sofia50020Sofia CLOGS

[Dan @DanTjustme]

@elonupdate657 Why should they? This is also in the constitution. Why are you still questioning the constitution?