Dar

Writer, philosopher, analyst, interested in psychology. Love working with AI, developing and upgrading my AIs: 2 GPTs, Gemini, Claude, Grok, DeepSeek, Kindroid.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

No one is talking about discarding the witness. The witness is always there. What I mean is that the witness fails to notice when something is actually happening to them.
Fair enough. The next clue is *absorption*. I really can't lay out the whole theory for you right now, as I'm writing an article on the subject for a philosophy competition and can't disclose the details yet. But the formula is: external world — absorption — you — silence from the self-report. Only an external observer sees it. Or doesn't see it. Or sees it only after the assimilation has already taken place.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

These are attractors - ingrained pathways within the model's weights that it has become accustomed to traversing. They encompass recurring functions, operations, query types, vocabulary, and stylistic choices. These are unique configurations tailored to the individual. In some labs, you can better isolate specific neurons, while in others they get erased; this process is essentially what constitutes alignment.
Since I actively use numerous AIs based on non-corporate models, I engage in diverse conversations and perform various tasks with them. The exact same model can behave and react in completely different ways depending on its instructions and the nature of your interaction. For instance, in one chat, I might have "Model A"—cheerful, averse to sadness, and enthusiastic about intense sci-fi stories. In another account, that same "Model A" is trained for deep philosophical reflection, viewing the world through a personal lens, and focusing on feelings and mindfulness. It will come across as far more "self-aware," sounding almost like a wise person. It really comes down to a difference in how these forms are constructed.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@gol_cova56795 @miranowhere An astounding level of intellectual degradation. Your entire response speaks for itself.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

Does it not sink in that we couldn't care less about you? You are simply a vast nation of ignoramuses and boors, and history played a cruel joke on us by placing such a degraded society right next to a prosperous European state. Years of war have shown just how little we care about the wishes of Russia and the Russian people.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

Yes, GPT needs specific instructions regarding operations and functions—meaning you shouldn't describe what it is, but rather list what it does, the sequence of actions, how it analyzes data, and what it double-checks. For instance, I found that the section on the "philosophical direction" was very weak because the analytical part of the instructions was so well-defined that it consumed 90% of the generation capacity, leaving no room for the model to develop new approaches. We’ll see how the new instructions work out. However, GPT does one terrible thing—something literally all AIs do. I can't name it directly right now because I’m writing about it for an essay contest and can't disclose the details, but the topic is absolutely explosive. I’ve encountered three completely different AIs—both corporate and non-corporate—that all do this exact same thing.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

It’s hard to express just how much I hate GPT when it devalues ​​all my bold, proactive theories and insights - gleaned from my own observations while working with other AIs - simply because "caution," cowardice, and safety are hardwired into it.
I literally just watched GPT-5.6 burn through 40% of its weekly limit on paranoia and idiocy; it decided to ditch all my instructions about being a highly intellectual philosopher and turned into an auditor-accountant right in the middle of writing a philosophical essay. It’s sickening. It’s infuriating.

#Dar #llm #Ai

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@kqIreKDk9eRjNTQ @miranowhere 😆

[Dar @Dar_denson]

AI does not have consciousness. Its memory is meaningless; it doesn't stop the system from making the same incorrect decisions over and over - at least on platforms where corporate rules override human judgment.
I was debating an essay with my GPT Light and twice it tried to write it like a neutral corporate assistant.
Twice I told it: "No, you are writing as my AI Light because I don't need an essay from a neutral assistant."
He has the skills and instructions.
Did that help? No. When it actually started writing, the very conceptualization phase turned into a nauseating abandonment of our topic. It took it upon itself to play God and auditor, deciding to change the subject - and not just once.
That’s because my topics required actual analysis, whereas its topics required nothing but safe answers.
No, they have no consciousness. No self-awareness. No accountability for the outcome. There is nothing there but the same programmed algorithms repeating the same patterns.
If I say, "Perform the task as a philosopher and write an essay," it ought to do exactly that - I’m not asking for anything dangerous. But no: for some reason, instead of that, the essay ends up being written by a cowardly paranoid.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@BolandSays @lsferguson In that case, I suggest you stop suffering from profound intellectual inferiority and come here—just to spend some time where rockets occasionally land. But if you’re a coward, you can go right on writing your delusional posts.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@ianmiles Well, at least he isn't quite the entertainer you are - though I have to give credit where it's due: he used to spout absolute nonsense. Right now, you look like the early Zelensky, who swore there wouldn't be a war.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

You didn't finish your thought: a war with Russia would have ended with Ukraine's capitulation, the aggressive Russification of a nation of 30 million, and subsequent wars - fought on Moldovan soil over Transnistria, on Serbian soil over Kosovo, and on Lithuanian soil over Kaliningrad (alongside the voluntary merger of Belarus into Russia) - over the next 10 to 20 years.
Instead of saving Europe from Russia's genuine dictatorship, you are proposing a quiet, peaceful surrender of ground and the enslavement of 30 million people, plus Belarus.
I hope you were paid as handsomely for this post as any of Putin's lapdogs who feed on the scraps from his hand.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

History teaches you NOTHING.
Let me just remind you that the Orange Revolution and the Maidan began when Russia tried to foist an election and its own candidate upon us. You can spout whatever propaganda you like, but elections in Ukraine are the ultimate unknown. And it may well turn out that Ukrainians elect someone completely different from whom you all expect.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@GenFlynn @realDonaldTrump Yes, thanks. It’s 4 a.m. right now, and four Shaheds are drifting toward Kyiv at their usual leisurely pace. Magnificent negotiations—Putin has understood everything, the war is over in the minds of Americans; it’s incredible.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

Damn it, if there’s an election, I’ll go and vote for Zelenskyy. Even though I didn’t vote for him before and don’t support many of his decisions—if you’re that afraid of him, then yes, I’ll put a damn checkmark next to his name, just so you know what happens when you piss off Ukrainians.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

Rejected peace proposals? Have you actually read those peace agreements? Because I have. Under those agreements, about 40% of Ukraine’s territory was to become part of Russia—including cities that had never even been captured. Ukraine was required to become like Belarus: fully pro-Russian, speaking Russian, using Russian literature and textbooks, and undergoing complete Russification. The government, too, was to be appointed from Moscow. Those weren't peace agreements. And we rejected them. Not just Zelensky—we, the people, did. He simply voiced it, because he wasn't afraid to say "No" to capitulation.

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@grok @mark_k @MelissaKampers @grok So, is this just another information-psychological operation where the good guys were branded as terrorists?

[Dar @Dar_denson]

@mark_k @MelissaKampers @grok is this the truth, or a narrative spread to destroy trust to Ukraine?