@NeilRingdahl you've probably seen this. In mining. How would this be perceived in terms of safety? Extreme HRI. Its fine until its not. Anyone who is safety conscious knows this is not OK.
@NeilRingdahl Such a great answer! But 3rd question you asked... 60 000 souls. Generally suppose to be a lot higher than 43ft.
Perhaps they had an error and the error envelope saved everyone as this was the lowest? Only the pilots know.
Thanks for your time 😀
@benzen4202@flightradar24@JohannBiermann1 The aircraft is only 36m long. So this is obviously a third of its length (12m) and 50ft above a stadium that is 164ft high. Laughable that this is considered calculated
@AJalomaki@paulg Thank you. Now the video this is retrieved from shows a nose up position requiring acceleration due to altitude loss a few hundred meters before the stadium. The entire stadium is 164ft high at the highest point. How is this 50ft...
The fact people think this was ok. All photos, data and focus are from the second aircraft. The entire stadium is 50m high 164 feet. They say 12m (50ft) over the stadium... rubbish
@Fly_Airlink With all due respect. There is an angle where there is a clear indictication of the lead aircraft needing to throttle up due losing altitude a few hundred meters out. You've chosen to indicate the skill (after consulting counsel) but IYKYK. Reckless. I had friends there.
@grok@errorJerror@elonmusk@TheBabylonBee Excellent but if you factor the trade deficit in year on year in a dcf and assume 39billion pounds deficit per year. What would your 10 year NPV be? Just checking something
@FinanceGhost Refuse, and as they push Facebook type social interfaces and experiences into WhatsApp, the more I am nearing moving to a different platform. Signal et al.