๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ธ?
Everyoneโs heard of them. Few actually get them.
No math. No AI jargon.
Just a clean mental model to truly understand how they work.
Letโs start with a relatable story โ
โคท Imagine teaching a kid to recognize cats and dogs
You show a picture.
The kid stares. Thinks.
Says โCat.โ
Next day, you show another one.
This time, the kidโs confused maybe itโs a dog?
With time, they start noticing patterns:
โ Pointy ears? Could be a cat
โ Floppy ears? Probably a dog
โ Whiskers? Small paws? Long snout?
They learn by feedback. Adjust. Improve.
Thatโs exactly what a neural network does.
Letโs map this step-by-step:
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ญ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐ฝ๐๐ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ
This is the modelโs โeyes.โ
Each pixel in an image โ becomes a number.
An image of size 100x100 โ becomes 10,000 numbers.
Just like how your eyes capture light and color, the input layer feeds raw data into the system.
๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ ๐ฎ: ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ (๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป)
Each neuron in this layer tries to extract patterns:
โณ One might detect edges
โณ Another might detect circular shapes
โณ Another starts noticing fur texture
And as we stack more layersโฆ
They start learning higher-level concepts:
โณ Two eyes + triangle ears + fur โ likely a cat
โณ Long tongue + floppy ears + big nose โ likely a dog
Each layer transforms the data into increasingly useful features.
๐ช๐๐๐ง ๐๐ฅ๐ ๐ช๐๐๐๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ง๐ฆ ๐๐ก๐ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฉ๐๐ง๐๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ก๐ฆ?
Think of weights as how much the model โtrustsโ a signal.
The more useful a feature is (like whiskers for cats), the higher the weight.
Activations are like switches.
If a neuron sees a strong enough signal, it turns on. If not, it stays silent.
Together, these build a brain that pays attention to the right stuff.
๐ข๐จ๐ง๐ฃ๐จ๐ง ๐๐๐ฌ๐๐ฅ: ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ป๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ
The final layer gives you probabilities.
โคท 82% Cat
โคท 18% Dog
But what if itโs wrong? Thatโs where learning kicks in.
๐๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฅ + ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ = ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฅ๐ข๐ฉ๐๐ ๐๐ก๐ง
The model compares its guess with the actual label.
It calculates โhow wrongโ it was โ then adjusts its weights using backpropagation.
Each time it sees more data, it gets slightly better.
The goal?
To minimize the error โ until the network becomes an expert at prediction.
๐๐ซ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐๐ ๐๐ก ๐๐๐ง๐๐ข๐ก:
You feed a neural net 1000s of images of handwritten digits (like 3s, 5s, 9s).
You donโt code โhow to recognize a 3โ.
You just show it examples.
The model learns:
โณ 3 has two curves
โณ 5 has a flat top
โณ 9 has a loop at the top and a stick below
This is pattern learning at scale.
๐๐ข๐ง๐ง๐ข๐ ๐๐๐ก๐:
A neural network is just a system that:
โ Takes input
โ Learns patterns
โ Adjusts with feedback
โ Gets smarter with experience
Itโs not magic.
Itโs a smart loop of trial โ error โ improvement.
Thatโs the brain of AI.
And nowโฆ you actually get it.
---
Follow @Arifalam4u
๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐๐๐ฃ๐ง ๐ถ๐ ๐ฑ๐๐บ๐ฏ.
๐๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ป๐ผ ๐บ๐ฒ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ.
๐๐ ๐ด๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐. ๐๐ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐๐๐ณ๐ณ ๐๐ฝ.
๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ปโ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ป๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐น๐.
๐ช๐ฎ๐ป๐ป๐ฎ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐?
๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐๐ โ Retrieval-Augmented Generation
Letโs break it down โฌ๏ธ
๐ช๐ต๐ ๐๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ ๐ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น ๐๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ
These models were trained on books, forums, Wikipediaโฆ
But theyโve never seen:
โณ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฒ๐บ๐ฎ๐ถ๐น๐
โณ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฑ๐๐ฐ๐ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฐ๐
โณ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐๐๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐
๐ฆ๐ผ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ ๐ด๐๐ฒ๐๐.
And they guess wrong confidently.
๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ณ๐ถ๐ ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐. ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒโ๐ ๐ต๐ผ๐:
โณ Take a userโs question
โณ Search your private knowledge base for answers
โณ Inject the most relevant chunks into the prompt
โณ Let the LLM reply with grounded context
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐๐ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐.
๐๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ
โ Without RAG: Whatโs the refund policy?
Model replies: Refunds not allowed after 14 days. (Made-up nonsense)
โ With RAG:
Model searches your internal return-policy. pdf, finds the 2024 clause, and answers:
Refunds are allowed within 30 days if the product is unopened and in original condition.
Same ChatGPT.
But now? It actually knows stuff.
๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐ป๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ (๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น ๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด)
1. Ingest
โณ Upload your PDFs, Notion docs, Confluence pages, etc.
2. Chunk + Embed
โณ Break into readable chunks
โณ Convert each chunk to a vector using embedding models (OpenAI, BGE, etc.)
3. Store in Vector DB
โณ FAISS, Pinecone, Weaviate use whichever fits your stack
4. Search on Query
โณ User types a question
โณ You retrieve top relevant chunks (semantic similarity)
5. Augment Prompt
โณ Inject the retrieved context into the prompt
โณ Then pass it to the LLM for response
Thatโs it.
Now your bot can access any internal info like a pro.
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐?
โณ Slack AI Search
โณ Notion AI
โณ GitHub Copilot Chat for private repos
โณ Almost every AI chatbot in enterprise
Itโs not just useful Itโs the default architecture for grounded, real-world LLM apps
---
Follow @Arifalam4u
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ต๐บ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐? ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐.
No matter if youโre building a fraud detection model or a credit scoring system
๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ often beats everything else without deep tuning.
Hereโs how it works, ๐ฎ๐ ๐ถ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐โ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฒ๐ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ถ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ด๐๐ฒ
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐บ ๐ช๐ถ๐๐ต ๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐
Decision Trees are simple and powerful.
But they tend to overfit. Badly.
Theyโll memorize your training data, split too many times, and get confused by noise.
Which means great accuracy on paper, but terrible performance in real-world data.
So what if we donโt rely on just one tree?
๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ: ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฒ
Imagine ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฌ different Decision Trees,
Each trained on a ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฒ๐ of your data
Each considering a ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ฒ๐ of features
โณ Thatโs a Random Forest: a collection of weak learners voting together.
Why does this work so well?
Because randomization โ lowers correlation โ reduces overfitting โ increases generalization.
Think of it like this:
1 dumb voter = noisy
100 random voters = surprisingly wise
๐๐ผ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ธ๐
โณ First, we use bootstrapping
โRandomly sample data (with replacement) to create different training sets
โณ Then we build many Decision Trees
โEach one picks random features at each split
โณ Final output?
โMajority vote for classification
โAverage value for regression
Result: High accuracy, low variance, no manual tuning needed.
๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐น-๐ช๐ผ๐ฟ๐น๐ฑ ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ
Letโs say you work in FinTech.
Youโre building a fraud detection model.
But fraud patterns change.
A simple Decision Tree overfits to old patterns.
๐ช๐ถ๐๐ต ๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐:
โณ You feed it transaction history, user metadata, device info
โณ It trains 100+ trees
โณ Learns generalized patterns of fraud
โณ And flags anomalies with surprisingly high precision even on unseen data
You just saved your company millions.
๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ป ๐ฆ๐ต๐ผ๐๐น๐ฑ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐จ๐๐ฒ ๐๐?
โ When you need high accuracy out of the box
โ When you want to avoid heavy tuning
โ When your data is structured and tabular
โ When interpretability is less important than performance
๐๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ฃ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐?
Random Forest can also give you feature importance
โณ So you learn what actually drives predictions.
๐ง๐ถ๐ฝ: Use ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ธ๐ถ๐-๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
model = RandomForestClassifier(n_estimators=100, max_depth=10)
https://t.co/HmRW1WJDhS(X_train, y_train)
predictions = model.predict(X_test)
โณ Add model.feature_importances_ to see what mattered most.
๐ง๐ผ ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ฝ:
Random Forest is not โfancyโ
Itโs just clever, practical, and battle-tested.
If youโre not sure where to start with a supervised ML problem
Start with Random Forest.
Itโll surprise you with how far it takes you.
๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ ๐ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐น๐ถ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฏ๐น๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฑ.
You might train the modelโฆ
You might get good accuracyโฆ
But if you donโt know how the algorithm scales with data,
Youโll end up deploying a model that collapses in production.
๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป / ๐๐ผ๐ด๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐ยฒ + ๐ยณ) if closed-form, ๐ถ(๐๐) per iteration in gradient descent
Simple, scalable, great for baseline models
Struggles only with ultra-high dimensionality (think text data with 100K+ tokens)
๐-๐ก๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐ ๐ก๐ฒ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ฏ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ (๐๐ก๐ก)
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐) at inference yes, prediction time
Thereโs no training cost
But the larger your data, the slower your predictions become
Imagine a search through 1 million rows per query
๐๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐ log ๐)
Very efficient on both training and inference
But trees tend to overfit, especially on noisy datasets
๐ฅ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐ก ร ๐๐ log ๐) โ t = number of trees
Training can be parallelized
So while itโs heavier than a single tree, itโs still production-grade at scale
๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ผ๐ผ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ง๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ (XGBoost, LightGBM)
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐ก ร ๐ log ๐)
Outperforms RF on many tasks
But the training time can grow with too many boosting rounds (๐)
LightGBM is faster on large, sparse datasets due to leaf-wise splits
๐ฆ๐จ๐ฃ๐ฃ๐ข๐ฅ๐ง ๐ฉ๐๐๐ง๐ข๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ก๐ (๐ฆ๐ฉ๐ )
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: Worst case ๐ถ(๐ยณ)
Great for small datasets
But scales very poorly with more rows
Avoid for big data unless using linear SVM + approximate solvers
๐ก๐ฎ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐)
Lightning fast, even on huge feature sets
Why? No optimization just counting + probabilities
Perfect for spam detection, text classification at scale
๐-๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ป๐ ๐๐น๐๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ด
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐๐๐ก๐) โ k = clusters, t = iterations
Scales decently
But sensitive to initialization
Use k-means++ for smarter centroids and faster convergence
๐ฃ๐๐ (๐ฃ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ป๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ป๐ฎ๐น๐๐๐ถ๐)
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: ๐ถ(๐ยฒ๐ + ๐ยณ)
Used for dimensionality reduction
But gets heavy when features go into tens of thousands
If using on image/text data, combine with truncation or randomized SVD
๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น ๐ก๐ฒ๐๐ (๐ ๐๐ฃs, CNNs, RNNs)
โณ ๐ง๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ: Varies wildly
Basic MLP = ๐ถ(๐๐๐ยฒ) where l = layers
CNNs depend on filter sizes
RNNs = slow for sequence length
Use batching, GPU acceleration, and smart layer design to scale deep learning
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ธ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๐ฎ๐๐ฎ๐?
โ ๐๐ผ๐ปโ๐ ๐ฝ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐ฎ๐น๐ด๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ต๐บ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ ๐ฎ๐น๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ
---
Follow @Arifalam4u
๐ฆ๐ค๐ ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ฆ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ (๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ฎ๐ฑ ๐๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป)
๐๐ฒ๐โ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ต๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐: ๐ฆ๐ค๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐บ๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐.
โค ๐๐ข๐๐ก๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ ๐ณ๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐พ๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป
โถ INNER JOIN: Returns matching rows
โถ LEFT JOIN: All rows from left + matched from right
โถ RIGHT JOIN: All rows from right + matched from left
โถ FULL JOIN: All rows with matches from both
โถ SELF JOIN: Join table with itself
Pro tip: Add ON conditions carefully or get a cartesian disaster
โค ๐ช๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ผ๐ ๐๐๐ป๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฑ๐๐ฎ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฝ๐น๐๐ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ
โถ ROW_NUMBER() OVER(PARTITION BY dept ORDER BY salary DESC)
โถ RANK(), DENSE_RANK(), LAG(), LEAD()
Use case: Find second-highest salary per department
Why itโs asked: Checks if you understand partitioning
โค ๐๐ผ๐บ๐บ๐ผ๐ป ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป (๐๐ง๐)
WITH top_emps AS (
SELECT name, salary,
RANK() OVER(PARTITION BY dept ORDER BY salary DESC) AS rnk
FROM employees
)
SELECT * FROM top_emps WHERE rnk = 1;
Bonus: Cleaner than subqueries, super readable
โค ๐ง๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ธ๐ ๐ค๐๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ ๐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ง ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฒ
โถ Find second highest salary
โถ Detect duplicates
โถ Running total by date
โถ Find employees who never submitted reports
โถ Department with highest avg salary
โถ Show top 3 items sold per category
โถ Users active 3 days in a row
โค ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ฝ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐๐๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ง๐๐ฆ
โถ GROUP BY, HAVING, COUNT(DISTINCT ...)
โถ GROUPING SETS, CUBE, ROLLUP for advanced analysis
โถ Aggregate + CASE combo to count conditionally
โค ๐๐๐ง๐๐ฆ + ๐ฆ๐จ๐๐ค๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ + ๐๐ซ๐๐ฆ๐ง๐ฆ
โถ DATE_DIFF(), CURRENT_DATE, DATE_TRUNC()
โถ WHERE EXISTS (...) to filter on child records
โถ Subqueries in SELECT and WHERE โ but use wisely
โค ๐๐๐๐จ๐๐๐๐ก๐ ๐ฆ๐๐๐๐
โถ Check joins: run SELECT COUNT(*) before & after
โถ Run in parts: test subqueries in isolation
โถ Check NULL handling: COALESCE() or logic fails
โค ๐๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ง๐๐ฃ๐ฆ
โถ Always explain your approach first
โถ If stuck: narrate your thought process
โถ Use LIMIT 5 to validate outputs
โถ Ask: โCan I assume table names and structure?โ
โค ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐: ๐ ๐จ๐ฆ๐ง-๐๐ก๐ข๐ช ๐๐ข๐ ๐ ๐๐ก๐๐ฆ
DISTINCT, CASE, IS NULL, BETWEEN, IN, ANY, ALL, CAST(), LIKE, REGEXP
๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ป๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ต๐ผ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฑ + ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฏ๐๐ด ๐ฐ๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ๐ ๐ค๐จ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ฆ.
Itโs not about knowing everything itโs about solving smartly.
---
That's a wrap!!
- Python ๐
- AI/ML ๐ค
- Data Science ๐ผ
- SW Dev ๐
- AI Tools ๐งฐ
- Roadmap โ๏ธ
Find me โ @Arifalam4u โ๏ธ
Everyday, I share post on above topics.
๐๐๐ฌ๐จ๐ฎ๐ซ๐๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ญ ๐๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ญ๐๐
๐ 400+ ๐๐ฎ๐๐ฎ ๐ฆ๐ฐ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฐ๐ฒ ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐: https://t.co/mJFhYD7SZ0
๐ธ/ Datalemur. com
Do computer architecture course atleast once in your life.
It fills in so many gaps and enhances fundamental understanding of computer science and software development
Applied Machine Learning - Cornell CS5785
"Starting from the very basics, covering all of the most important ML algorithms and how to apply them in practice. Executable Jupyter notebooks (and as slides)". 80 videos!!