David

HI

[David @David_W232]

@olstar18 @jeffreytucker Pretty sure you're just making that up.

[David @David_W232]

@JamesNEaton2 @Humanspective @justicenow_alan So no studies?

[David @David_W232]

@boutros555 They then got the CDC to issue a scientifically accurate statement but there was additional drama about messaging as the original false statement got put out anyway.

[David @David_W232]

@boutros555 This isn't the example you think it is. Did you even read the entire entry? CDC person wanted to put out a statement that was scientifically false. Fauci and a bunch of other doctors objected because 1) it wasn't true and 2) would undermine the vaccine effort.

[David @David_W232]

@CLBchamps @jeffreytucker Where did they say that? The diary entry is clear that he got the CDC to issue a statement that the vaccines had "only modest and waning efficacy."

Yall should try reading beyond the highlighted part.

[David @David_W232]

@olstar18 @jeffreytucker They didn't cover it up. It's right there in the diary entry. He convinced the CDC to issue a more accurate statement that the vaccines had modest and waning efficacy.

[David @David_W232]

@Cad_Republican So how do you know that his vaccine caused his blood clot?

[David @David_W232]

@naomirwolf Kind of interesting that you honestly think there is something here when the email to Fauci clearly states they were testing does ONE HUNDRED TIMES greater than human levels...

[David @David_W232]

@KathrynPaisner @leightonnotcool So you have no evidence. Got it.

[David @David_W232]

@lucythegreat123 Gotta do everything to distract from the fact that Trump lost a war to Iran.

[David @David_W232]

@KevinMNelsonUSA Read the sentence before the one highlighted. He opposed the statement because it wasn't true.

[David @David_W232]

@KathrynPaisner @leightonnotcool Be specific. How did Fauci stifle scientific discourse?

[David @David_W232]

@KathrynPaisner @leightonnotcool You didn't post an article. You posted a screenshot.

[David @David_W232]

@Humanspective Y'all are so dishonest. The email quite clearly says they were using doses 100 times greater than human levels.

[David @David_W232]

@Humanspective @justicenow_alan It's 2026 now. Why are there no scientific studies confirming this danger? If these vaccines are truly dangerous there should be plenty of evidence by now. You just have one study that straight up says they used doses 100 times greater than human levels...

[David @David_W232]

@KathrynPaisner @leightonnotcool You are the one posting an article of Fauci taking a perfectly reasonable stance that wetmarkets are a public health risk and need to be shut down and claiming that it's him stifling scientific discourse.

[David @David_W232]

@SenRandPaul Read the entry closely senator. He opposed the statement for two reasons. First, it wasn't true and second because it would undermine efforts to get people vaccinated. Why did you highlight the second reason he listed and not the first?

[David @David_W232]

@E66115444 @mtaibbi He won't answer questions because Republicans in Congress have made it quite clear they are on a witch hunt to jail him.

[David @David_W232]

@KathrynPaisner @leightonnotcool How did his call to have wetmarkets shut down suppress scientific discourse?