@NetflixUK Netflix has totally misjudged this. Almost Noone in the UK wants to see or hear from any single one of these football pundits ever again. We turn off our TV commentary and listen to any others on dedicated sports radio instead.
@JeremyClarkson Wrong on all counts I am afraid. It is Sussex, Dartmoor in Central Devon and the South and South Coast of Cornwall that are THE choices you cant decide between. Scotland is just scrubland.
Jeremy Clarkson’s Farm show on Amazon is the most radicalizing piece of mainstream media I’ve ever seen
Just one example (bear with me):
Badgers became a protected species in Britain 40+ years ago.
The population has exploded and now frequently transmits tuberculosis to cows
But farmers can’t cull the badger population to protect their cattle because the government still considers them to be endangered
Instead of addressing the root cause, the UK has the most batshit testing regime for cattle
There’s no TB vaccine. So the cattle have to get tested. The vets administering the test have to measure welts on the cows neck. Whether a cow lives or dies comes down to a vet trying to discern 1mm on a caliper (reactive vs non reactive).
If a cow tests positive, the farm (already running on super thin margins) is quarantined and starts hemorrhaging money.
Jeremy Clarkson’s cow (pregnant with twins) has an inconclusive test so it’s separated from the herd. It receives a second inconclusive test so they have to kill it (before it can give birth to the twins).
Now here’s the kicker: the autopsy reveals no sign of TB. It was a healthy cow needlessly killed
So - silver lining the farm should be removed from quarantine, right? WRONG - it’s still under quarantine and has to keep testing and can’t sell its beef
Kafkaesque doesn’t even begin to describe how f’d up it is for British farmers
From the WEF website
DIGITAL
IDENTITY
TO CONTROL
THEM ALL!
Without Digital ID the agenda 2030 targets are unachievable. We must say NO to Digital ID, then we buy ourselves time for the truth to emerge and it’s game over for the globalist plans to control humanity.
If you are of the view that millions of your fellow Britons are angry only because they have been “whipped up” by a few right-wing bogeymen, you truly do not understand your own country.
This is the same nonsense we heard after Southport.
They can’t accept the simple truth that people are reacting to the horrors imposed upon them, and don’t need to be told what to do by Elon Musk or anyone else.
@NickDixon And I imagine she assumes she has the same magic powers to influence people just because she is in the public sphere. She hasn't. People can make there own minds up and act accordingly.
I am certain that people who are now being arrested and charged over the events of Southampton are be threatened with being held in remand if they don’t plead guilty and being told that a guilty plea will lead to a reduced sentence.
DON’T PLEAD GUILTY
Take the remand. You are being used as tokens of the fake establishment, they will incarcerate you anyway. You will stand trial in a crown court, overseen by an actual judge not some shitty ideologically captured magistrate.
STOP PLEADING GUILTY.
📣🚨 FSU VICTORY!
FSU member James Cooper has been acquitted of violent disorder at Manchester Crown Court (Crown Square).
On 31 July 2024, in the wake of the horrific Southport murders, James attended a protest outside the Holiday Inn on Oldham Road, which was housing asylum seekers.
James was one of around 50–70 people at the protest. He was arrested and charged with violent disorder under Section 2 of the Public Order Act 1986, an offence carrying a maximum sentence of five years’ imprisonment.
Having seen a Facebook post about the demonstration, James attended and filmed events. Unlike some of the other protesters, he was not involved in any violent acts.
The Crown’s case against him was weak. Prosecutors argued that James had committed violent disorder simply by being present in the vicinity of the crowd, shouting remarks such as “shithouses” and “what would you do if it was one of your kids”, as well as engaging in a robust exchange with a police officer. They claimed this amounted to using or threatening violence.
Giving evidence, James firmly denied using or threatening violence and said he had attended what he believed would be a peaceful protest. He explained that he had shouted at police officers because he felt they were being heavy-handed.
Today, after around two hours of deliberation, the jury unanimously acquitted James. This verdict once again demonstrates the importance of jury trials — an ancient right that the Government wishes to dilute — in cases involving freedom of expression and protest.
The Free Speech Union was pleased to support James and fund his legal defence. He was represented by barrister Adam King and solicitor Luke Gittos.
In the wake of the Southport murders, we saw public order legislation enforced with extraordinary zeal, often at the expense of legitimate dissent and protest.
We are pleased to have been able to help James secure this outcome.
Nicola Sturgeon on Newsround in 2022 talking to school kids about the cost of living crisis
‘My husband does most of the shopping in my household but he notices the way things are going up in the supermarkets’
Yeah right 😆😅
A farmer dies in April 2026.
His son inherits the farm. The farm has been in the family since 1847.
The farm consists of: 300 acres of grazing pasture, a farmhouse built in 1892, a barn, a milking parlour, two tractors of varying ages, a Land Rover that runs about 70% of the time, and a herd of 180 Hereford-cross cattle.
On paper, the farm is worth approximately £3.2 million. This is because land near him has been bought recently by a London hedge fund looking for carbon credits, which has dragged the comparable value of every field within forty miles upward to a number nobody local can justify.
In cash, the farm produces a profit of about £28,000 a year in a good year. In a bad year it loses money. The son also works as a fencing contractor three days a week to keep the operation viable.
The inheritance tax bill on a £3.2 million estate, even at the reduced 20% rate, comes to approximately £140,000 after the increased threshold is applied. The son does not have £140,000. The son has never had £140,000. The son has £4,200 in his current account and an overdraft.
The son sells 60 acres to a developer to pay the tax. The developer puts solar panels on the 60 acres. The remaining herd cannot be sustained on the reduced land. The herd is sold. The barn becomes a holiday let.
A different family eats Brazilian beef this Christmas without knowing why the price went up.
The Treasury collects £140,000.
The land never produces British food again.