Dav

Seeker of the fastest & cheapest value flow within identity owned immutable data.🌾🐝

[Rafael LaVerde @vamosvigilante]

Today I was randomly listening to a Bitcoin space on BIP 110. Suddenly they started talking about me being a Bitcoiner who sold all of his BTC for BSV. Not totally true because XMR was already around.

However, we never expected BTC to amount to anything because it was and is quite frankly retarded.

I also did not associate with anyone taking money from Jeffrey Epstein to have any real insight as to who Bitcoiners were truly up against: the satanic pedovore bankster cartel. They have done great at misrepresenting Bitcoin as the failure in tech we now see in BTC: which forks twice next month.

I always suspected that the dark bankster cartel was behind the hijacking of Bitcoin - and with evermore reason I felt morally obligated to continue teaching the fullness of Bitcoin. Co-creating The Crypto Vigilante gave me that platform: one where I can help in protecting the fullness of Bitcoin by educating investors in providing them a full scope of the history, tech, and the market.

I came to understand the fullness of Bitcoin on my own. BSV is right now doing over 1M+ TPS per second on-chain. Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto: he achieved what everyone said would be impossible - onchain Bitcoin scaling. He and other teams are right now training AI on chain via micropayments.

In a last ditch effort to save BTC they copied BSV libraries and called it BitVM - echoing what Craig Wright had said on the all star panel to Nick Szabo (where he was laughed at) : that Bitcoin is a Turing Complete Machine.

Small blockers were wrong and stupid and the only reason BTC grew so much was because it was/is associated with the Epstein class.

I stand by my decision of supporting BSV because Bitcoin was created to actually help humanity with on chain capital goods: not to be a do nothing bankster traded token.

We scaled Bitcoin.

To all BSVers - especially you Dr. Wright- thank you so much for scaling Bitcoin and giving humanity a fighting chance against the technocratic nightmare that they have planned for us all.

[Calvin Ayre @CalvinAyre]

On a serious note, the whole BIP110 thing is dumb. Just come to BSV.

[Twetch @twetchapp]

Fun fact: Twetch posts and replies only cost the Bitcoin network fee, which is about 62 sats.

62 sats ≈ $0.0000085 USD

About 1,178 posts would total 1¢ in network fees

[Twetch @twetchapp]

[https://t.co/UERIloUwkm]

[Twetch @twetchapp]

Swap any asset for bsv, directly in your twetch wallet.

Now live on [twetch]

[Siggi @___siggi___]

@zuki_kizami @BHatooor13304 BSV is a blockchain. Craig is a person. I think you might be having difficulty separating the 2. Open your mind and look at BSV without the personalities.

[Kurt Wuckert Jr @kurtwuckertjr]

The earth is healing.

[Kurt Wuckert Jr @kurtwuckertjr]

I'm preparing to give a university presentation about the history of money, and explain bitcoin's place in that history.

Starts in about two hours.

Wish me luck!

[CryptoClub @BullRushClub]

A New Customer Has Arrived: Software Itself. That’s Why the Great Bitcoin SV Flippening Is Coming

AI systems are now doing real work To do that work, they need to buy things — data, compute power, answers, access — millions of times per day, often for fractions of a cent.

No bank, no card network, no app store can handle payments that small. Their fees are larger than the transaction itself.

This creates an entire new economy with no efficient way to move money.

Real Bitcoin (SV) is the cash register for this new world. 📈

- Instant, near-zero cost micropayments
- Immutable on-chain receipts that anyone can verify and no one can erase
- Native massive data storage (Metanet) for permanent, verifiable AI records

Every transaction too small for Visa flows to whoever runs this rail.

The second half of the value is memory. AI actions today vanish or sit on servers that can be deleted. A permanent, tamper-proof record of what the machine did, said, and paid for is worth real money to any business that ever needs to prove what its software actually did.

This is exactly why the great Bitcoin SV Flippening is coming.

The storm is coming. 💥

Sources:
- Elon Musk statements on AI agents and economic transformation (2026)
- BSV Association Teranode performance data (2026)
- Original Bitcoin White Paper (2008)
- Public documentation on Metanet and on-chain data storage

#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #FunctionalUtility #AIagents #Micropayments #SatoshiVision

[CryptoClub @BullRushClub]

Why Bitcoin (BTC) Will Never Come Close to $1 Million — Not Even Hundreds of Thousands

At one million dollars per BTC, the mining system would attempt to absorb roughly 7% of global electricity production.

That’s not a modest increase. It’s nearly two years of normal worldwide electricity demand growth — slammed on top of AI data centres, EVs, industrial electrification and everyday economic expansion. 📈

The result? Skyrocketing wholesale electricity prices, embedded inflation across steel, cement, food, transport, and manufacturing, and ultimately stagflation — higher prices and lower growth.

No responsible economist disputes the physics. Energy supply is inflexible in the short run. A speculative asset trying to consume that much power would break the system long before it ever approached that price.

Real Bitcoin (SV) was built for a completely different reality.

Instead of competing for the title of digital gold, Bitcoin SV delivers real utility at global scale:
- Unlimited on-chain capacity (Teranode >1.1 million TPS)
- Fees in fractions of a cent
- On-chain data storage for AI agents and enterprise use

The same energy used productively for actual economic activity — not just securing a store-of-value narrative.

This is why BTC’s price ceiling is structural, not just cyclical.
The physics and economics don’t allow it — not $1 million, and not even close to hundreds of thousands in any sustainable way.

In contrast, Real Bitcoin (SV) has a far higher structural ceiling
Because it is designed for massive real-world utility, its value could grow orders of magnitude higher without triggering the same destructive energy shock.

The flippening isn’t a matter of if.
It’s only a matter of when.

The storm is coming. 💥

Sources:
- Analysis of Bitcoin mining electricity demand at high price levels (2026)
- Global electricity supply constraints and marginal pricing dynamics
- BSV Association Teranode performance reports (2026)
- Historical documentation on energy shocks and stagflation effects

#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #SatoshiVision #FunctionalUtility #EnergyReality

[Dr Craig S Wright @Dr_CSWright]

COPA’s action against me is itself proof that BTC has institutional governance and control.

A supposedly leaderless system somehow coordinated corporations, developers, exchanges, funders, lawyers and industry bodies around a common objective: determining who may define Bitcoin, which history is accepted, which rules prevail and who is excluded.

That is governance. It is control exercised through law, capital, institutions, reputation and access rather than merely through code.

Without that governing structure, there could have been no organised action against me. COPA did not disprove institutional control over BTC.

COPA demonstrated it.

[CryptoClub @BullRushClub]

The CLARITY Act Could Act as a Major Regulatory Filter

The upcoming CLARITY Act has the potential to separate real infrastructure from pure speculation across the crypto market.

Most projects will likely struggle to meet the higher standards the bill is establishing. The vast majority of altcoins and tokens are either heavily centralized, controlled by small teams or foundations, frequently altered through hard forks, or exist primarily as speculative assets with minimal real-world utility. When regulators begin applying clearer criteria around decentralization, maturity, and genuine usage, many of these projects could face serious challenges — both in classification and ongoing compliance. 📉

Real Bitcoin (SV) stands in a markedly different position.

Unlike most chains, BSV has remained technically faithful to the original Bitcoin White Paper from day one. It never implemented SegWit, never imposed an artificial block size limit, and has maintained full on-chain scalability since genesis. With Teranode, it already demonstrates the ability to process over a million transactions per second in testing, while keeping fees at fractions of a cent. 📈

This is significant. The CLARITY Act appears to favor networks that are genuinely decentralized, mature, and capable of supporting real economic activity — not just speculation. BSV’s long, unbroken Proof-of-Work chain, combined with its strong focus on actual utility through Metanet and enterprise-grade infrastructure, aligns far more closely with what regulators are likely to recognize as a mature digital commodity.

Most competing projects were built with very different priorities — quick fundraising, narrative-driven growth, or centralized control. As the regulatory environment becomes stricter, these structural weaknesses will become increasingly apparent. Projects unable to demonstrate credible decentralization and real utility may face higher compliance costs, restricted market access, or declining investor confidence.

In contrast, BSV’s foundational design choices — made years ago — now position it as one of the very few protocols that can credibly meet these higher standards without needing fundamental changes to its architecture.

This does not guarantee immediate price appreciation, but it does create a **meaningful relative advantage**. As regulatory clarity increases, the market may finally begin to differentiate more sharply between hype-driven tokens and genuine scalable infrastructure.

The gap between technology and price has rarely been this extreme.

The storm is coming. 💥

Sources:
- Digital Asset Market Clarity Act (H.R. 3633) – Senate Banking Committee version (June 2026)
- Original Bitcoin White Paper (2008)
- Public blockchain data and protocol comparisons (BTC vs BSV)
- BSV Association Teranode performance reports

#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #FunctionalUtility #CLARITYAct #ScalableBitcoin

[CryptoClub @BullRushClub]

The Next Chapter For Real Bitcoin (SV) – Detailed Price Scenarios 2026–2028

On Friday I shared realistic price ranges for BSV. Today let’s break down why these scenarios are grounded in technology, adoption trends, and market dynamics — not hype. 📈

### Base Case: $500 – $1,500 (High Probability)
Moderate global adoption of AI agents and enterprise use cases continues. BSV gains recognition as a high-throughput settlement layer, but regulatory uncertainty and market inertia persist.
Key drivers: Steady growth in stablecoins, supply chain projects, and on-chain data usage via Metanet. Teranode proves reliability at scale.

### Moderate Case: $3,000 – $8,000 (Medium Probability)
Clearer regulatory environment + accelerating AI agent adoption. BSV becomes a preferred infrastructure for high-volume, low-cost transactions and immutable data storage.
Key drivers: Mass deployment of AI agents requiring cheap, scalable settlement. Asia expands stablecoin and RWA usage on BSV. Enterprise partnerships scale significantly.

### Optimistic Case: $15,000 – $50,000+ (Low Probability)
BSV achieves mainstream recognition as the original, scalable Bitcoin. It becomes the default settlement and data layer for AI-driven economies and tokenized real-world assets.
Key drivers: Major regulatory clarity in the US and Asia, explosive growth in agentic AI, and BSV capturing a meaningful share of global micropayments and on-chain data markets.

### Extreme Case: $100,000+ (Very Low Probability)
BSV becomes the dominant global infrastructure layer for AI agents, RWA, and high-frequency settlement. It effectively functions as the “energy-to-value” bridge in a post-fiat, high-AI world.
Key drivers: Global regulatory tailwinds and strong network effects as developers and enterprises migrate to the only chain that can deliver true scalability without compromises.

Why these ranges make sense?

The current price of BSV does not reflect its technological reality:
- Teranode already demonstrates >1.1 million TPS in testing
- Unlimited block sizes (terabyte-scale proven)
- Fees measured in fractions of a cent
- Native support for massive on-chain data (Metanet) — ideal for AI agents and immutable records

The biggest asymmetry in crypto today is the disconnect between BSV’s proven infrastructure and its market capitalization.

As @CsTominaga has long emphasized, the original protocol was designed for real utility at global scale. Markets always eventually discount the future — sometimes slowly, sometimes suddenly.

Get ready. The technology is already here.

The storm is coming. 💥

Sources:
- Elon Musk statements on Bitcoin as energy/physics-based currency (2025 interviews)
- Original Bitcoin White Paper (2008)
- Protocol comparison: SegWit & block size limit (BTC) vs original design (BSV)
- SanDisk / Western Digital analysis on AI agentic storage demand (July 2026)

#RealBitcoin #BitcoinSV #BSV #SatoshiVision #FunctionalUtility #Teranode #Metanet #AIagents #AsymmetricOpportunity #CryptoInfrastructure #ScalableBitcoin #ValueInvesting

[Indelible.One @indelibleBSV]

Some personal news: a piece of my code just got merged into the official BSV TypeScript stack.

https://t.co/Y8nrh95AUB

First, thank you to @ProjectBabbage , @___siggi___, and the whole team over at the @BSVAssociation BSV Association for reviewing and accepting work from an independent builder. You took it seriously, reviewed it properly, and merged it. That means a lot.

For the non-developers, here is what it does. Teranode, the new node software powering BSV, constantly broadcasts messages about what is happening on the network: new blocks, new transaction bundles, rejections. Until now, any developer who wanted to listen to that feed received raw bytes and had to figure out the format themselves, by hand, and hope they got it right. Every single builder had to solve the same puzzle alone.

What got merged is a typed decoder: you plug it in, and those raw bytes become clean, labeled, self-describing messages. Block messages look like block messages. Rejections tell you what was rejected and why. The guesswork is gone for everyone who builds on this, forever. It is a small piece, but it is the kind of small piece that makes the next hundred builders faster.

This did not come from a whiteboard. It came from running Teranode listeners in production on my own fleet of machines, hitting that decoding wall myself, and solving it because I had to. That is usually where the best contributions come from.

And that is really why I am posting this. If you build on BSV and you hit friction, some format you had to reverse-engineer, some missing piece you built for yourself, consider sending it upstream. The official repos accept outside work. The reviews are real and fair. Your one annoying afternoon becomes everyone's solved problem, and the ecosystem gets a little stronger every time someone does it.

One last honest note on how this happened. I have been building on this network every day for six months, and every one of those working sessions is saved permanently and searchable, because that is literally the product I build: Indelible, permanent memory for AI. When it came time to write this contribution, my AI already knew the wire format, the listener quirks, the debugging history, all of it, because nothing we ever figured out was lost. I did not start from scratch. I started from everything.

That is the whole thesis, really. Keep your context, and it compounds. 🔥

[Light @LightBSV]

@CalvinAyre Open source like my BSV Layered Multicast Network solution!
https://t.co/UYk0pWTAkd
@1BSVNET

[Kurt Wuckert Jr @kurtwuckertjr]

Every axiom about BTC is fake.

- It’s easy to change the rules.
- BTC has been rolled back twice.
- Your “node” does nothing.
- Paper BTC > 21 million.
- It is confiscatable.

Your favorite influencer is full of crap.

The BIP110 argument proves my thesis that BTC can be controlled, politically, at the repo, and that devs are the target for controlling the system.

Think your node “votes” honestly?

It doesn’t.

Think about how cheaply a big bank or big government can spin up 50k instances that flag for the upgrade THEY want.

It’s all social engineering, propaganda, controlled opposition and the cycles created by the same people who control the fiat dollar (the Fed) and the fiat-fiat dollar (Tether.)

Wake up!

[Light @LightBSV]

Today I proved 9 million TPS across a single 1BSV ingress proxy.

That is 96% interface saturation of 25 Gbit at 256 Byte payload size.

It only gets better from here. Bitcoin Multicast Scales!

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

Let me explain this slowly for the Lightning numpties at the back.

Lightning requires on-chain scaling.

Yes, I know. Terrible. The little toy castle collapses the moment someone counts the bricks.

To use Lightning at scale, people need channels. Channels need opening. Channels need closing. Channels need liquidity. Liquidity needs moving. Routes need rebalancing. Failed routes need recovery. Disputes need settlement. Fraud attempts need enforcement. Users entering and leaving the system need on-chain transactions.

Where do those transactions go?

On-chain.

So when you say, “BTC cannot scale on-chain, therefore we need Lightning,” you have not solved the scaling problem. You have hidden it under a rug and called the lump “Layer 2.”

If Lightning is used by a handful of hobbyists, fine, the base chain can limp along. If Lightning is used by the world, the base chain must process massive volumes of channel operations and settlement transactions. That requires large blocks.

And if the base chain can handle large blocks, large volumes, low fees, and reliable settlement, then why the hell do you need Lightning as the primary payment system?

That is the circular idiocy:

BTC cannot scale, so use Lightning.

Lightning only works at scale if BTC scales.

If BTC scales, Lightning is unnecessary for ordinary payments.

Congratulations. You built a bridge that only works after the river has been drained.

Lightning is not scaling. It is an elaborate confession that BTC was deliberately crippled and then wrapped in engineering theatre so people would stop asking why digital cash cannot be used as digital cash.

[Jeff Swanson @theswansjr]

How much BSV does SpaceX hold on the balance sheet?
For those who don't know, BSV is the real bitcoin. 😉

[S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright) @CsTominaga]

It is not just disruption.

It is Orwellian. The point is not merely to attack a system that can scale, process, record, timestamp, and settle at industrial volume. The point is to seize control of the narrative around it before ordinary people understand what has been built.

If a system allows low-cost transactions, permanent records, auditable exchange, programmable enforcement, evidence trails, and commercial scaling outside their preferred gatekeepers, then it threatens more than a few business models. It threatens control.

So they rename things. They rewrite history. They invert language. They call scaling “centralisation,” utility “danger,” records “surveillance,” law “tyranny,” and property “monopoly.” Every word is bent until it serves power.

That is why the fight is not only technical. It is institutional. It is legal. It is economic. It is narrative control.

BSV continuing is the problem for them. It means the thing they tried to bury did not die.